You can not select more than 25 topics Topics must start with a letter or number, can include dashes ('-') and can be up to 35 characters long.

234 lines
7.7 KiB

/*
* Copyright (c) 2013-2020, ARM Limited and Contributors. All rights reserved.
*
* SPDX-License-Identifier: BSD-3-Clause
*/
#include <assert.h>
#include <stddef.h>
#include <arch.h>
#include <arch_helpers.h>
#include <common/bl_common.h>
#include <common/debug.h>
#include <lib/el3_runtime/context_mgmt.h>
#include <lib/el3_runtime/pubsub_events.h>
#include <plat/common/platform.h>
#include "psci_private.h"
/*
* Helper functions for the CPU level spinlocks
*/
static inline void psci_spin_lock_cpu(unsigned int idx)
{
spin_lock(&psci_cpu_pd_nodes[idx].cpu_lock);
}
static inline void psci_spin_unlock_cpu(unsigned int idx)
{
spin_unlock(&psci_cpu_pd_nodes[idx].cpu_lock);
}
/*******************************************************************************
* This function checks whether a cpu which has been requested to be turned on
* is OFF to begin with.
******************************************************************************/
PSCI: Add framework to handle composite power states The state-id field in the power-state parameter of a CPU_SUSPEND call can be used to describe composite power states specific to a platform. The current PSCI implementation does not interpret the state-id field. It relies on the target power level and the state type fields in the power-state parameter to perform state coordination and power management operations. The framework introduced in this patch allows the PSCI implementation to intepret generic global states like RUN, RETENTION or OFF from the State-ID to make global state coordination decisions and reduce the complexity of platform ports. It adds support to involve the platform in state coordination which facilitates the use of composite power states and improves the support for entering standby states at multiple power domains. The patch also includes support for extended state-id format for the power state parameter as specified by PSCIv1.0. The PSCI implementation now defines a generic representation of the power-state parameter. It depends on the platform port to convert the power-state parameter (possibly encoding a composite power state) passed in a CPU_SUSPEND call to this representation via the `validate_power_state()` plat_psci_ops handler. It is an array where each index corresponds to a power level. Each entry contains the local power state the power domain at that power level could enter. The meaning of the local power state values is platform defined, and may vary between levels in a single platform. The PSCI implementation constrains the values only so that it can classify the state as RUN, RETENTION or OFF as required by the specification: * zero means RUN * all OFF state values at all levels must be higher than all RETENTION state values at all levels * the platform provides PLAT_MAX_RET_STATE and PLAT_MAX_OFF_STATE values to the framework The platform also must define the macros PLAT_MAX_RET_STATE and PLAT_MAX_OFF_STATE which lets the PSCI implementation find out which power domains have been requested to enter a retention or power down state. The PSCI implementation does not interpret the local power states defined by the platform. The only constraint is that the PLAT_MAX_RET_STATE &lt; PLAT_MAX_OFF_STATE. For a power domain tree, the generic implementation maintains an array of local power states. These are the states requested for each power domain by all the cores contained within the domain. During a request to place multiple power domains in a low power state, the platform is passed an array of requested power-states for each power domain through the plat_get_target_pwr_state() API. It coordinates amongst these states to determine a target local power state for the power domain. A default weak implementation of this API is provided in the platform layer which returns the minimum of the requested power-states back to the PSCI state coordination. Finally, the plat_psci_ops power management handlers are passed the target local power states for each affected power domain using the generic representation described above. The platform executes operations specific to these target states. The platform power management handler for placing a power domain in a standby state (plat_pm_ops_t.pwr_domain_standby()) is now only used as a fast path for placing a core power domain into a standby or retention state should now be used to only place the core power domain in a standby or retention state. The extended state-id power state format can be enabled by setting the build flag PSCI_EXTENDED_STATE_ID=1 and it is disabled by default. Change-Id: I9d4123d97e179529802c1f589baaa4101759d80c
10 years ago
static int cpu_on_validate_state(aff_info_state_t aff_state)
{
PSCI: Add framework to handle composite power states The state-id field in the power-state parameter of a CPU_SUSPEND call can be used to describe composite power states specific to a platform. The current PSCI implementation does not interpret the state-id field. It relies on the target power level and the state type fields in the power-state parameter to perform state coordination and power management operations. The framework introduced in this patch allows the PSCI implementation to intepret generic global states like RUN, RETENTION or OFF from the State-ID to make global state coordination decisions and reduce the complexity of platform ports. It adds support to involve the platform in state coordination which facilitates the use of composite power states and improves the support for entering standby states at multiple power domains. The patch also includes support for extended state-id format for the power state parameter as specified by PSCIv1.0. The PSCI implementation now defines a generic representation of the power-state parameter. It depends on the platform port to convert the power-state parameter (possibly encoding a composite power state) passed in a CPU_SUSPEND call to this representation via the `validate_power_state()` plat_psci_ops handler. It is an array where each index corresponds to a power level. Each entry contains the local power state the power domain at that power level could enter. The meaning of the local power state values is platform defined, and may vary between levels in a single platform. The PSCI implementation constrains the values only so that it can classify the state as RUN, RETENTION or OFF as required by the specification: * zero means RUN * all OFF state values at all levels must be higher than all RETENTION state values at all levels * the platform provides PLAT_MAX_RET_STATE and PLAT_MAX_OFF_STATE values to the framework The platform also must define the macros PLAT_MAX_RET_STATE and PLAT_MAX_OFF_STATE which lets the PSCI implementation find out which power domains have been requested to enter a retention or power down state. The PSCI implementation does not interpret the local power states defined by the platform. The only constraint is that the PLAT_MAX_RET_STATE &lt; PLAT_MAX_OFF_STATE. For a power domain tree, the generic implementation maintains an array of local power states. These are the states requested for each power domain by all the cores contained within the domain. During a request to place multiple power domains in a low power state, the platform is passed an array of requested power-states for each power domain through the plat_get_target_pwr_state() API. It coordinates amongst these states to determine a target local power state for the power domain. A default weak implementation of this API is provided in the platform layer which returns the minimum of the requested power-states back to the PSCI state coordination. Finally, the plat_psci_ops power management handlers are passed the target local power states for each affected power domain using the generic representation described above. The platform executes operations specific to these target states. The platform power management handler for placing a power domain in a standby state (plat_pm_ops_t.pwr_domain_standby()) is now only used as a fast path for placing a core power domain into a standby or retention state should now be used to only place the core power domain in a standby or retention state. The extended state-id power state format can be enabled by setting the build flag PSCI_EXTENDED_STATE_ID=1 and it is disabled by default. Change-Id: I9d4123d97e179529802c1f589baaa4101759d80c
10 years ago
if (aff_state == AFF_STATE_ON)
return PSCI_E_ALREADY_ON;
PSCI: Add framework to handle composite power states The state-id field in the power-state parameter of a CPU_SUSPEND call can be used to describe composite power states specific to a platform. The current PSCI implementation does not interpret the state-id field. It relies on the target power level and the state type fields in the power-state parameter to perform state coordination and power management operations. The framework introduced in this patch allows the PSCI implementation to intepret generic global states like RUN, RETENTION or OFF from the State-ID to make global state coordination decisions and reduce the complexity of platform ports. It adds support to involve the platform in state coordination which facilitates the use of composite power states and improves the support for entering standby states at multiple power domains. The patch also includes support for extended state-id format for the power state parameter as specified by PSCIv1.0. The PSCI implementation now defines a generic representation of the power-state parameter. It depends on the platform port to convert the power-state parameter (possibly encoding a composite power state) passed in a CPU_SUSPEND call to this representation via the `validate_power_state()` plat_psci_ops handler. It is an array where each index corresponds to a power level. Each entry contains the local power state the power domain at that power level could enter. The meaning of the local power state values is platform defined, and may vary between levels in a single platform. The PSCI implementation constrains the values only so that it can classify the state as RUN, RETENTION or OFF as required by the specification: * zero means RUN * all OFF state values at all levels must be higher than all RETENTION state values at all levels * the platform provides PLAT_MAX_RET_STATE and PLAT_MAX_OFF_STATE values to the framework The platform also must define the macros PLAT_MAX_RET_STATE and PLAT_MAX_OFF_STATE which lets the PSCI implementation find out which power domains have been requested to enter a retention or power down state. The PSCI implementation does not interpret the local power states defined by the platform. The only constraint is that the PLAT_MAX_RET_STATE &lt; PLAT_MAX_OFF_STATE. For a power domain tree, the generic implementation maintains an array of local power states. These are the states requested for each power domain by all the cores contained within the domain. During a request to place multiple power domains in a low power state, the platform is passed an array of requested power-states for each power domain through the plat_get_target_pwr_state() API. It coordinates amongst these states to determine a target local power state for the power domain. A default weak implementation of this API is provided in the platform layer which returns the minimum of the requested power-states back to the PSCI state coordination. Finally, the plat_psci_ops power management handlers are passed the target local power states for each affected power domain using the generic representation described above. The platform executes operations specific to these target states. The platform power management handler for placing a power domain in a standby state (plat_pm_ops_t.pwr_domain_standby()) is now only used as a fast path for placing a core power domain into a standby or retention state should now be used to only place the core power domain in a standby or retention state. The extended state-id power state format can be enabled by setting the build flag PSCI_EXTENDED_STATE_ID=1 and it is disabled by default. Change-Id: I9d4123d97e179529802c1f589baaa4101759d80c
10 years ago
if (aff_state == AFF_STATE_ON_PENDING)
return PSCI_E_ON_PENDING;
PSCI: Add framework to handle composite power states The state-id field in the power-state parameter of a CPU_SUSPEND call can be used to describe composite power states specific to a platform. The current PSCI implementation does not interpret the state-id field. It relies on the target power level and the state type fields in the power-state parameter to perform state coordination and power management operations. The framework introduced in this patch allows the PSCI implementation to intepret generic global states like RUN, RETENTION or OFF from the State-ID to make global state coordination decisions and reduce the complexity of platform ports. It adds support to involve the platform in state coordination which facilitates the use of composite power states and improves the support for entering standby states at multiple power domains. The patch also includes support for extended state-id format for the power state parameter as specified by PSCIv1.0. The PSCI implementation now defines a generic representation of the power-state parameter. It depends on the platform port to convert the power-state parameter (possibly encoding a composite power state) passed in a CPU_SUSPEND call to this representation via the `validate_power_state()` plat_psci_ops handler. It is an array where each index corresponds to a power level. Each entry contains the local power state the power domain at that power level could enter. The meaning of the local power state values is platform defined, and may vary between levels in a single platform. The PSCI implementation constrains the values only so that it can classify the state as RUN, RETENTION or OFF as required by the specification: * zero means RUN * all OFF state values at all levels must be higher than all RETENTION state values at all levels * the platform provides PLAT_MAX_RET_STATE and PLAT_MAX_OFF_STATE values to the framework The platform also must define the macros PLAT_MAX_RET_STATE and PLAT_MAX_OFF_STATE which lets the PSCI implementation find out which power domains have been requested to enter a retention or power down state. The PSCI implementation does not interpret the local power states defined by the platform. The only constraint is that the PLAT_MAX_RET_STATE &lt; PLAT_MAX_OFF_STATE. For a power domain tree, the generic implementation maintains an array of local power states. These are the states requested for each power domain by all the cores contained within the domain. During a request to place multiple power domains in a low power state, the platform is passed an array of requested power-states for each power domain through the plat_get_target_pwr_state() API. It coordinates amongst these states to determine a target local power state for the power domain. A default weak implementation of this API is provided in the platform layer which returns the minimum of the requested power-states back to the PSCI state coordination. Finally, the plat_psci_ops power management handlers are passed the target local power states for each affected power domain using the generic representation described above. The platform executes operations specific to these target states. The platform power management handler for placing a power domain in a standby state (plat_pm_ops_t.pwr_domain_standby()) is now only used as a fast path for placing a core power domain into a standby or retention state should now be used to only place the core power domain in a standby or retention state. The extended state-id power state format can be enabled by setting the build flag PSCI_EXTENDED_STATE_ID=1 and it is disabled by default. Change-Id: I9d4123d97e179529802c1f589baaa4101759d80c
10 years ago
assert(aff_state == AFF_STATE_OFF);
return PSCI_E_SUCCESS;
}
/*******************************************************************************
* Generic handler which is called to physically power on a cpu identified by
* its mpidr. It performs the generic, architectural, platform setup and state
* management to power on the target cpu e.g. it will ensure that
* enough information is stashed for it to resume execution in the non-secure
* security state.
*
* The state of all the relevant power domains are changed after calling the
* platform handler as it can return error.
******************************************************************************/
int psci_cpu_on_start(u_register_t target_cpu,
const entry_point_info_t *ep)
{
int rc;
aff_info_state_t target_aff_state;
int ret = plat_core_pos_by_mpidr(target_cpu);
unsigned int target_idx = (unsigned int)ret;
/* Calling function must supply valid input arguments */
assert(ret >= 0);
assert(ep != NULL);
/*
* This function must only be called on platforms where the
* CPU_ON platform hooks have been implemented.
*/
assert((psci_plat_pm_ops->pwr_domain_on != NULL) &&
(psci_plat_pm_ops->pwr_domain_on_finish != NULL));
PSCI: Introduce new platform interface to describe topology This patch removes the assumption in the current PSCI implementation that MPIDR based affinity levels map directly to levels in a power domain tree. This enables PSCI generic code to support complex power domain topologies as envisaged by PSCIv1.0 specification. The platform interface for querying the power domain topology has been changed such that: 1. The generic PSCI code does not generate MPIDRs and use them to query the platform about the number of power domains at a particular power level. The platform now provides a description of the power domain tree on the SoC through a data structure. The existing platform APIs to provide the same information have been removed. 2. The linear indices returned by plat_core_pos_by_mpidr() and plat_my_core_pos() are used to retrieve core power domain nodes from the power domain tree. Power domains above the core level are accessed using a &#39;parent&#39; field in the tree node descriptors. The platform describes the power domain tree in an array of &#39;unsigned char&#39;s. The first entry in the array specifies the number of power domains at the highest power level implemented in the system. Each susbsequent entry corresponds to a power domain and contains the number of power domains that are its direct children. This array is exported to the generic PSCI implementation via the new `plat_get_power_domain_tree_desc()` platform API. The PSCI generic code uses this array to populate its internal power domain tree using the Breadth First Search like algorithm. The tree is split into two arrays: 1. An array that contains all the core power domain nodes 2. An array that contains all the other power domain nodes A separate array for core nodes allows certain core specific optimisations to be implemented e.g. remove the bakery lock, re-use per-cpu data framework for storing some information. Entries in the core power domain array are allocated such that the array index of the domain is equal to the linear index returned by plat_core_pos_by_mpidr() and plat_my_core_pos() for the MPIDR corresponding to that domain. This relationship is key to be able to use an MPIDR to find the corresponding core power domain node, traverse to higher power domain nodes and index into arrays that contain core specific information. An introductory document has been added to briefly describe the new interface. Change-Id: I4b444719e8e927ba391cae48a23558308447da13
10 years ago
/* Protect against multiple CPUs trying to turn ON the same target CPU */
psci_spin_lock_cpu(target_idx);
/*
* Generic management: Ensure that the cpu is off to be
* turned on.
* Perform cache maintanence ahead of reading the target CPU state to
* ensure that the data is not stale.
* There is a theoretical edge case where the cache may contain stale
* data for the target CPU data - this can occur under the following
* conditions:
* - the target CPU is in another cluster from the current
* - the target CPU was the last CPU to shutdown on its cluster
* - the cluster was removed from coherency as part of the CPU shutdown
*
* In this case the cache maintenace that was performed as part of the
* target CPUs shutdown was not seen by the current CPU's cluster. And
* so the cache may contain stale data for the target CPU.
*/
flush_cpu_data_by_index(target_idx,
psci_svc_cpu_data.aff_info_state);
PSCI: Add framework to handle composite power states The state-id field in the power-state parameter of a CPU_SUSPEND call can be used to describe composite power states specific to a platform. The current PSCI implementation does not interpret the state-id field. It relies on the target power level and the state type fields in the power-state parameter to perform state coordination and power management operations. The framework introduced in this patch allows the PSCI implementation to intepret generic global states like RUN, RETENTION or OFF from the State-ID to make global state coordination decisions and reduce the complexity of platform ports. It adds support to involve the platform in state coordination which facilitates the use of composite power states and improves the support for entering standby states at multiple power domains. The patch also includes support for extended state-id format for the power state parameter as specified by PSCIv1.0. The PSCI implementation now defines a generic representation of the power-state parameter. It depends on the platform port to convert the power-state parameter (possibly encoding a composite power state) passed in a CPU_SUSPEND call to this representation via the `validate_power_state()` plat_psci_ops handler. It is an array where each index corresponds to a power level. Each entry contains the local power state the power domain at that power level could enter. The meaning of the local power state values is platform defined, and may vary between levels in a single platform. The PSCI implementation constrains the values only so that it can classify the state as RUN, RETENTION or OFF as required by the specification: * zero means RUN * all OFF state values at all levels must be higher than all RETENTION state values at all levels * the platform provides PLAT_MAX_RET_STATE and PLAT_MAX_OFF_STATE values to the framework The platform also must define the macros PLAT_MAX_RET_STATE and PLAT_MAX_OFF_STATE which lets the PSCI implementation find out which power domains have been requested to enter a retention or power down state. The PSCI implementation does not interpret the local power states defined by the platform. The only constraint is that the PLAT_MAX_RET_STATE &lt; PLAT_MAX_OFF_STATE. For a power domain tree, the generic implementation maintains an array of local power states. These are the states requested for each power domain by all the cores contained within the domain. During a request to place multiple power domains in a low power state, the platform is passed an array of requested power-states for each power domain through the plat_get_target_pwr_state() API. It coordinates amongst these states to determine a target local power state for the power domain. A default weak implementation of this API is provided in the platform layer which returns the minimum of the requested power-states back to the PSCI state coordination. Finally, the plat_psci_ops power management handlers are passed the target local power states for each affected power domain using the generic representation described above. The platform executes operations specific to these target states. The platform power management handler for placing a power domain in a standby state (plat_pm_ops_t.pwr_domain_standby()) is now only used as a fast path for placing a core power domain into a standby or retention state should now be used to only place the core power domain in a standby or retention state. The extended state-id power state format can be enabled by setting the build flag PSCI_EXTENDED_STATE_ID=1 and it is disabled by default. Change-Id: I9d4123d97e179529802c1f589baaa4101759d80c
10 years ago
rc = cpu_on_validate_state(psci_get_aff_info_state_by_idx(target_idx));
if (rc != PSCI_E_SUCCESS)
goto exit;
/*
* Call the cpu on handler registered by the Secure Payload Dispatcher
* to let it do any bookeeping. If the handler encounters an error, it's
* expected to assert within
*/
if ((psci_spd_pm != NULL) && (psci_spd_pm->svc_on != NULL))
psci_spd_pm->svc_on(target_cpu);
/*
PSCI: Add framework to handle composite power states The state-id field in the power-state parameter of a CPU_SUSPEND call can be used to describe composite power states specific to a platform. The current PSCI implementation does not interpret the state-id field. It relies on the target power level and the state type fields in the power-state parameter to perform state coordination and power management operations. The framework introduced in this patch allows the PSCI implementation to intepret generic global states like RUN, RETENTION or OFF from the State-ID to make global state coordination decisions and reduce the complexity of platform ports. It adds support to involve the platform in state coordination which facilitates the use of composite power states and improves the support for entering standby states at multiple power domains. The patch also includes support for extended state-id format for the power state parameter as specified by PSCIv1.0. The PSCI implementation now defines a generic representation of the power-state parameter. It depends on the platform port to convert the power-state parameter (possibly encoding a composite power state) passed in a CPU_SUSPEND call to this representation via the `validate_power_state()` plat_psci_ops handler. It is an array where each index corresponds to a power level. Each entry contains the local power state the power domain at that power level could enter. The meaning of the local power state values is platform defined, and may vary between levels in a single platform. The PSCI implementation constrains the values only so that it can classify the state as RUN, RETENTION or OFF as required by the specification: * zero means RUN * all OFF state values at all levels must be higher than all RETENTION state values at all levels * the platform provides PLAT_MAX_RET_STATE and PLAT_MAX_OFF_STATE values to the framework The platform also must define the macros PLAT_MAX_RET_STATE and PLAT_MAX_OFF_STATE which lets the PSCI implementation find out which power domains have been requested to enter a retention or power down state. The PSCI implementation does not interpret the local power states defined by the platform. The only constraint is that the PLAT_MAX_RET_STATE &lt; PLAT_MAX_OFF_STATE. For a power domain tree, the generic implementation maintains an array of local power states. These are the states requested for each power domain by all the cores contained within the domain. During a request to place multiple power domains in a low power state, the platform is passed an array of requested power-states for each power domain through the plat_get_target_pwr_state() API. It coordinates amongst these states to determine a target local power state for the power domain. A default weak implementation of this API is provided in the platform layer which returns the minimum of the requested power-states back to the PSCI state coordination. Finally, the plat_psci_ops power management handlers are passed the target local power states for each affected power domain using the generic representation described above. The platform executes operations specific to these target states. The platform power management handler for placing a power domain in a standby state (plat_pm_ops_t.pwr_domain_standby()) is now only used as a fast path for placing a core power domain into a standby or retention state should now be used to only place the core power domain in a standby or retention state. The extended state-id power state format can be enabled by setting the build flag PSCI_EXTENDED_STATE_ID=1 and it is disabled by default. Change-Id: I9d4123d97e179529802c1f589baaa4101759d80c
10 years ago
* Set the Affinity info state of the target cpu to ON_PENDING.
* Flush aff_info_state as it will be accessed with caches
* turned OFF.
*/
PSCI: Add framework to handle composite power states The state-id field in the power-state parameter of a CPU_SUSPEND call can be used to describe composite power states specific to a platform. The current PSCI implementation does not interpret the state-id field. It relies on the target power level and the state type fields in the power-state parameter to perform state coordination and power management operations. The framework introduced in this patch allows the PSCI implementation to intepret generic global states like RUN, RETENTION or OFF from the State-ID to make global state coordination decisions and reduce the complexity of platform ports. It adds support to involve the platform in state coordination which facilitates the use of composite power states and improves the support for entering standby states at multiple power domains. The patch also includes support for extended state-id format for the power state parameter as specified by PSCIv1.0. The PSCI implementation now defines a generic representation of the power-state parameter. It depends on the platform port to convert the power-state parameter (possibly encoding a composite power state) passed in a CPU_SUSPEND call to this representation via the `validate_power_state()` plat_psci_ops handler. It is an array where each index corresponds to a power level. Each entry contains the local power state the power domain at that power level could enter. The meaning of the local power state values is platform defined, and may vary between levels in a single platform. The PSCI implementation constrains the values only so that it can classify the state as RUN, RETENTION or OFF as required by the specification: * zero means RUN * all OFF state values at all levels must be higher than all RETENTION state values at all levels * the platform provides PLAT_MAX_RET_STATE and PLAT_MAX_OFF_STATE values to the framework The platform also must define the macros PLAT_MAX_RET_STATE and PLAT_MAX_OFF_STATE which lets the PSCI implementation find out which power domains have been requested to enter a retention or power down state. The PSCI implementation does not interpret the local power states defined by the platform. The only constraint is that the PLAT_MAX_RET_STATE &lt; PLAT_MAX_OFF_STATE. For a power domain tree, the generic implementation maintains an array of local power states. These are the states requested for each power domain by all the cores contained within the domain. During a request to place multiple power domains in a low power state, the platform is passed an array of requested power-states for each power domain through the plat_get_target_pwr_state() API. It coordinates amongst these states to determine a target local power state for the power domain. A default weak implementation of this API is provided in the platform layer which returns the minimum of the requested power-states back to the PSCI state coordination. Finally, the plat_psci_ops power management handlers are passed the target local power states for each affected power domain using the generic representation described above. The platform executes operations specific to these target states. The platform power management handler for placing a power domain in a standby state (plat_pm_ops_t.pwr_domain_standby()) is now only used as a fast path for placing a core power domain into a standby or retention state should now be used to only place the core power domain in a standby or retention state. The extended state-id power state format can be enabled by setting the build flag PSCI_EXTENDED_STATE_ID=1 and it is disabled by default. Change-Id: I9d4123d97e179529802c1f589baaa4101759d80c
10 years ago
psci_set_aff_info_state_by_idx(target_idx, AFF_STATE_ON_PENDING);
flush_cpu_data_by_index(target_idx,
psci_svc_cpu_data.aff_info_state);
/*
* The cache line invalidation by the target CPU after setting the
* state to OFF (see psci_do_cpu_off()), could cause the update to
* aff_info_state to be invalidated. Retry the update if the target
* CPU aff_info_state is not ON_PENDING.
*/
target_aff_state = psci_get_aff_info_state_by_idx(target_idx);
if (target_aff_state != AFF_STATE_ON_PENDING) {
assert(target_aff_state == AFF_STATE_OFF);
psci_set_aff_info_state_by_idx(target_idx, AFF_STATE_ON_PENDING);
flush_cpu_data_by_index(target_idx,
psci_svc_cpu_data.aff_info_state);
assert(psci_get_aff_info_state_by_idx(target_idx) ==
AFF_STATE_ON_PENDING);
}
/*
* Perform generic, architecture and platform specific handling.
*/
/*
* Plat. management: Give the platform the current state
* of the target cpu to allow it to perform the necessary
* steps to power on.
*/
rc = psci_plat_pm_ops->pwr_domain_on(target_cpu);
assert((rc == PSCI_E_SUCCESS) || (rc == PSCI_E_INTERN_FAIL));
if (rc == PSCI_E_SUCCESS)
/* Store the re-entry information for the non-secure world. */
cm_init_context_by_index(target_idx, ep);
else {
/* Restore the state on error. */
PSCI: Add framework to handle composite power states The state-id field in the power-state parameter of a CPU_SUSPEND call can be used to describe composite power states specific to a platform. The current PSCI implementation does not interpret the state-id field. It relies on the target power level and the state type fields in the power-state parameter to perform state coordination and power management operations. The framework introduced in this patch allows the PSCI implementation to intepret generic global states like RUN, RETENTION or OFF from the State-ID to make global state coordination decisions and reduce the complexity of platform ports. It adds support to involve the platform in state coordination which facilitates the use of composite power states and improves the support for entering standby states at multiple power domains. The patch also includes support for extended state-id format for the power state parameter as specified by PSCIv1.0. The PSCI implementation now defines a generic representation of the power-state parameter. It depends on the platform port to convert the power-state parameter (possibly encoding a composite power state) passed in a CPU_SUSPEND call to this representation via the `validate_power_state()` plat_psci_ops handler. It is an array where each index corresponds to a power level. Each entry contains the local power state the power domain at that power level could enter. The meaning of the local power state values is platform defined, and may vary between levels in a single platform. The PSCI implementation constrains the values only so that it can classify the state as RUN, RETENTION or OFF as required by the specification: * zero means RUN * all OFF state values at all levels must be higher than all RETENTION state values at all levels * the platform provides PLAT_MAX_RET_STATE and PLAT_MAX_OFF_STATE values to the framework The platform also must define the macros PLAT_MAX_RET_STATE and PLAT_MAX_OFF_STATE which lets the PSCI implementation find out which power domains have been requested to enter a retention or power down state. The PSCI implementation does not interpret the local power states defined by the platform. The only constraint is that the PLAT_MAX_RET_STATE &lt; PLAT_MAX_OFF_STATE. For a power domain tree, the generic implementation maintains an array of local power states. These are the states requested for each power domain by all the cores contained within the domain. During a request to place multiple power domains in a low power state, the platform is passed an array of requested power-states for each power domain through the plat_get_target_pwr_state() API. It coordinates amongst these states to determine a target local power state for the power domain. A default weak implementation of this API is provided in the platform layer which returns the minimum of the requested power-states back to the PSCI state coordination. Finally, the plat_psci_ops power management handlers are passed the target local power states for each affected power domain using the generic representation described above. The platform executes operations specific to these target states. The platform power management handler for placing a power domain in a standby state (plat_pm_ops_t.pwr_domain_standby()) is now only used as a fast path for placing a core power domain into a standby or retention state should now be used to only place the core power domain in a standby or retention state. The extended state-id power state format can be enabled by setting the build flag PSCI_EXTENDED_STATE_ID=1 and it is disabled by default. Change-Id: I9d4123d97e179529802c1f589baaa4101759d80c
10 years ago
psci_set_aff_info_state_by_idx(target_idx, AFF_STATE_OFF);
flush_cpu_data_by_index(target_idx,
psci_svc_cpu_data.aff_info_state);
}
PSCI: Introduce new platform and CM helper APIs This patch introduces new platform APIs and context management helper APIs to support the new topology framework based on linear core position. This framework will be introduced in the follwoing patch and it removes the assumption that the MPIDR based affinity levels map directly to levels in a power domain tree. The new platforms APIs and context management helpers based on core position are as described below: * plat_my_core_pos() and plat_core_pos_by_mpidr() These 2 new mandatory platform APIs are meant to replace the existing &#39;platform_get_core_pos()&#39; API. The &#39;plat_my_core_pos()&#39; API returns the linear index of the calling core and &#39;plat_core_pos_by_mpidr()&#39; returns the linear index of a core specified by its MPIDR. The latter API will also validate the MPIDR passed as an argument and will return an error code (-1) if an invalid MPIDR is passed as the argument. This enables the caller to safely convert an MPIDR of another core to its linear index without querying the PSCI topology tree e.g. during a call to PSCI CPU_ON. Since the &#39;plat_core_pos_by_mpidr()&#39; API verifies an MPIDR, which is always platform specific, it is no longer possible to maintain a default implementation of this API. Also it might not be possible for a platform port to verify an MPIDR before the C runtime has been setup or the topology has been initialized. This would prevent &#39;plat_core_pos_by_mpidr()&#39; from being callable prior to topology setup. As a result, the generic Trusted Firmware code does not call this API before the topology setup has been done. The &#39;plat_my_core_pos&#39; API should be able to run without a C runtime. Since this API needs to return a core position which is equal to the one returned by &#39;plat_core_pos_by_mpidr()&#39; API for the corresponding MPIDR, this too cannot have default implementation and is a mandatory API for platform ports. These APIs will be implemented by the ARM reference platform ports later in the patch stack. * plat_get_my_stack() and plat_set_my_stack() These APIs are the stack management APIs which set/return stack addresses appropriate for the calling core. These replace the &#39;platform_get_stack()&#39; and &#39;platform_set_stack()&#39; APIs. A default weak MP version and a global UP version of these APIs are provided for the platforms. * Context management helpers based on linear core position A set of new context management(CM) helpers viz cm_get_context_by_index(), cm_set_context_by_index(), cm_init_my_context() and cm_init_context_by_index() are defined which are meant to replace the old helpers which took MPIDR as argument. The old CM helpers are implemented based on the new helpers to allow for code consolidation and will be deprecated once the switch to the new framework is done. Change-Id: I89758632b370c2812973a4b2efdd9b81a41f9b69
10 years ago
exit:
PSCI: Introduce new platform interface to describe topology This patch removes the assumption in the current PSCI implementation that MPIDR based affinity levels map directly to levels in a power domain tree. This enables PSCI generic code to support complex power domain topologies as envisaged by PSCIv1.0 specification. The platform interface for querying the power domain topology has been changed such that: 1. The generic PSCI code does not generate MPIDRs and use them to query the platform about the number of power domains at a particular power level. The platform now provides a description of the power domain tree on the SoC through a data structure. The existing platform APIs to provide the same information have been removed. 2. The linear indices returned by plat_core_pos_by_mpidr() and plat_my_core_pos() are used to retrieve core power domain nodes from the power domain tree. Power domains above the core level are accessed using a &#39;parent&#39; field in the tree node descriptors. The platform describes the power domain tree in an array of &#39;unsigned char&#39;s. The first entry in the array specifies the number of power domains at the highest power level implemented in the system. Each susbsequent entry corresponds to a power domain and contains the number of power domains that are its direct children. This array is exported to the generic PSCI implementation via the new `plat_get_power_domain_tree_desc()` platform API. The PSCI generic code uses this array to populate its internal power domain tree using the Breadth First Search like algorithm. The tree is split into two arrays: 1. An array that contains all the core power domain nodes 2. An array that contains all the other power domain nodes A separate array for core nodes allows certain core specific optimisations to be implemented e.g. remove the bakery lock, re-use per-cpu data framework for storing some information. Entries in the core power domain array are allocated such that the array index of the domain is equal to the linear index returned by plat_core_pos_by_mpidr() and plat_my_core_pos() for the MPIDR corresponding to that domain. This relationship is key to be able to use an MPIDR to find the corresponding core power domain node, traverse to higher power domain nodes and index into arrays that contain core specific information. An introductory document has been added to briefly describe the new interface. Change-Id: I4b444719e8e927ba391cae48a23558308447da13
10 years ago
psci_spin_unlock_cpu(target_idx);
return rc;
}
/*******************************************************************************
* The following function finish an earlier power on request. They
PSCI: Add framework to handle composite power states The state-id field in the power-state parameter of a CPU_SUSPEND call can be used to describe composite power states specific to a platform. The current PSCI implementation does not interpret the state-id field. It relies on the target power level and the state type fields in the power-state parameter to perform state coordination and power management operations. The framework introduced in this patch allows the PSCI implementation to intepret generic global states like RUN, RETENTION or OFF from the State-ID to make global state coordination decisions and reduce the complexity of platform ports. It adds support to involve the platform in state coordination which facilitates the use of composite power states and improves the support for entering standby states at multiple power domains. The patch also includes support for extended state-id format for the power state parameter as specified by PSCIv1.0. The PSCI implementation now defines a generic representation of the power-state parameter. It depends on the platform port to convert the power-state parameter (possibly encoding a composite power state) passed in a CPU_SUSPEND call to this representation via the `validate_power_state()` plat_psci_ops handler. It is an array where each index corresponds to a power level. Each entry contains the local power state the power domain at that power level could enter. The meaning of the local power state values is platform defined, and may vary between levels in a single platform. The PSCI implementation constrains the values only so that it can classify the state as RUN, RETENTION or OFF as required by the specification: * zero means RUN * all OFF state values at all levels must be higher than all RETENTION state values at all levels * the platform provides PLAT_MAX_RET_STATE and PLAT_MAX_OFF_STATE values to the framework The platform also must define the macros PLAT_MAX_RET_STATE and PLAT_MAX_OFF_STATE which lets the PSCI implementation find out which power domains have been requested to enter a retention or power down state. The PSCI implementation does not interpret the local power states defined by the platform. The only constraint is that the PLAT_MAX_RET_STATE &lt; PLAT_MAX_OFF_STATE. For a power domain tree, the generic implementation maintains an array of local power states. These are the states requested for each power domain by all the cores contained within the domain. During a request to place multiple power domains in a low power state, the platform is passed an array of requested power-states for each power domain through the plat_get_target_pwr_state() API. It coordinates amongst these states to determine a target local power state for the power domain. A default weak implementation of this API is provided in the platform layer which returns the minimum of the requested power-states back to the PSCI state coordination. Finally, the plat_psci_ops power management handlers are passed the target local power states for each affected power domain using the generic representation described above. The platform executes operations specific to these target states. The platform power management handler for placing a power domain in a standby state (plat_pm_ops_t.pwr_domain_standby()) is now only used as a fast path for placing a core power domain into a standby or retention state should now be used to only place the core power domain in a standby or retention state. The extended state-id power state format can be enabled by setting the build flag PSCI_EXTENDED_STATE_ID=1 and it is disabled by default. Change-Id: I9d4123d97e179529802c1f589baaa4101759d80c
10 years ago
* are called by the common finisher routine in psci_common.c. The `state_info`
* is the psci_power_state from which this CPU has woken up from.
******************************************************************************/
void psci_cpu_on_finish(unsigned int cpu_idx, const psci_power_state_t *state_info)
{
/*
* Plat. management: Perform the platform specific actions
* for this cpu e.g. enabling the gic or zeroing the mailbox
* register. The actual state of this cpu has already been
* changed.
*/
PSCI: Add framework to handle composite power states The state-id field in the power-state parameter of a CPU_SUSPEND call can be used to describe composite power states specific to a platform. The current PSCI implementation does not interpret the state-id field. It relies on the target power level and the state type fields in the power-state parameter to perform state coordination and power management operations. The framework introduced in this patch allows the PSCI implementation to intepret generic global states like RUN, RETENTION or OFF from the State-ID to make global state coordination decisions and reduce the complexity of platform ports. It adds support to involve the platform in state coordination which facilitates the use of composite power states and improves the support for entering standby states at multiple power domains. The patch also includes support for extended state-id format for the power state parameter as specified by PSCIv1.0. The PSCI implementation now defines a generic representation of the power-state parameter. It depends on the platform port to convert the power-state parameter (possibly encoding a composite power state) passed in a CPU_SUSPEND call to this representation via the `validate_power_state()` plat_psci_ops handler. It is an array where each index corresponds to a power level. Each entry contains the local power state the power domain at that power level could enter. The meaning of the local power state values is platform defined, and may vary between levels in a single platform. The PSCI implementation constrains the values only so that it can classify the state as RUN, RETENTION or OFF as required by the specification: * zero means RUN * all OFF state values at all levels must be higher than all RETENTION state values at all levels * the platform provides PLAT_MAX_RET_STATE and PLAT_MAX_OFF_STATE values to the framework The platform also must define the macros PLAT_MAX_RET_STATE and PLAT_MAX_OFF_STATE which lets the PSCI implementation find out which power domains have been requested to enter a retention or power down state. The PSCI implementation does not interpret the local power states defined by the platform. The only constraint is that the PLAT_MAX_RET_STATE &lt; PLAT_MAX_OFF_STATE. For a power domain tree, the generic implementation maintains an array of local power states. These are the states requested for each power domain by all the cores contained within the domain. During a request to place multiple power domains in a low power state, the platform is passed an array of requested power-states for each power domain through the plat_get_target_pwr_state() API. It coordinates amongst these states to determine a target local power state for the power domain. A default weak implementation of this API is provided in the platform layer which returns the minimum of the requested power-states back to the PSCI state coordination. Finally, the plat_psci_ops power management handlers are passed the target local power states for each affected power domain using the generic representation described above. The platform executes operations specific to these target states. The platform power management handler for placing a power domain in a standby state (plat_pm_ops_t.pwr_domain_standby()) is now only used as a fast path for placing a core power domain into a standby or retention state should now be used to only place the core power domain in a standby or retention state. The extended state-id power state format can be enabled by setting the build flag PSCI_EXTENDED_STATE_ID=1 and it is disabled by default. Change-Id: I9d4123d97e179529802c1f589baaa4101759d80c
10 years ago
psci_plat_pm_ops->pwr_domain_on_finish(state_info);
#if !(HW_ASSISTED_COHERENCY || WARMBOOT_ENABLE_DCACHE_EARLY)
/*
* Arch. management: Enable data cache and manage stack memory
*/
psci_do_pwrup_cache_maintenance();
PSCI: Optimize call paths if all participants are cache-coherent The current PSCI implementation can apply certain optimizations upon the assumption that all PSCI participants are cache-coherent. - Skip performing cache maintenance during power-up. - Skip performing cache maintenance during power-down: At present, on the power-down path, CPU driver disables caches and MMU, and performs cache maintenance in preparation for powering down the CPU. This means that PSCI must perform additional cache maintenance on the extant stack for correct functioning. If all participating CPUs are cache-coherent, CPU driver would neither disable MMU nor perform cache maintenance. The CPU being powered down, therefore, remain cache-coherent throughout all PSCI call paths. This in turn means that PSCI cache maintenance operations are not required during power down. - Choose spin locks instead of bakery locks: The current PSCI implementation must synchronize both cache-coherent and non-cache-coherent participants. Mutual exclusion primitives are not guaranteed to function on non-coherent memory. For this reason, the current PSCI implementation had to resort to bakery locks. If all participants are cache-coherent, the implementation can enable MMU and data caches early, and substitute bakery locks for spin locks. Spin locks make use of architectural mutual exclusion primitives, and are lighter and faster. The optimizations are applied when HW_ASSISTED_COHERENCY build option is enabled, as it&#39;s expected that all PSCI participants are cache-coherent in those systems. Change-Id: Iac51c3ed318ea7e2120f6b6a46fd2db2eae46ede Signed-off-by: Jeenu Viswambharan &lt;jeenu.viswambharan@arm.com&gt;
8 years ago
#endif
/*
* Plat. management: Perform any platform specific actions which
* can only be done with the cpu and the cluster guaranteed to
* be coherent.
*/
if (psci_plat_pm_ops->pwr_domain_on_finish_late != NULL)
psci_plat_pm_ops->pwr_domain_on_finish_late(state_info);
/*
* All the platform specific actions for turning this cpu
* on have completed. Perform enough arch.initialization
* to run in the non-secure address space.
*/
Introduce PSCI Library Interface This patch introduces the PSCI Library interface. The major changes introduced are as follows: * Earlier BL31 was responsible for Architectural initialization during cold boot via bl31_arch_setup() whereas PSCI was responsible for the same during warm boot. This functionality is now consolidated by the PSCI library and it does Architectural initialization via psci_arch_setup() during both cold and warm boots. * Earlier the warm boot entry point was always `psci_entrypoint()`. This was not flexible enough as a library interface. Now PSCI expects the runtime firmware to provide the entry point via `psci_setup()`. A new function `bl31_warm_entrypoint` is introduced in BL31 and the previous `psci_entrypoint()` is deprecated. * The `smc_helpers.h` is reorganized to separate the SMC Calling Convention defines from the Trusted Firmware SMC helpers. The former is now in a new header file `smcc.h` and the SMC helpers are moved to Architecture specific header. * The CPU context is used by PSCI for context initialization and restoration after power down (PSCI Context). It is also used by BL31 for SMC handling and context management during Normal-Secure world switch (SMC Context). The `psci_smc_handler()` interface is redefined to not use SMC helper macros thus enabling to decouple the PSCI context from EL3 runtime firmware SMC context. This enables PSCI to be integrated with other runtime firmware using a different SMC context. NOTE: With this patch the architectural setup done in `bl31_arch_setup()` is done as part of `psci_setup()` and hence `bl31_platform_setup()` will be invoked prior to architectural setup. It is highly unlikely that the platform setup will depend on architectural setup and cause any failure. Please be be aware of this change in sequence. Change-Id: I7f497a08d33be234bbb822c28146250cb20dab73
9 years ago
psci_arch_setup();
PSCI: Introduce new platform interface to describe topology This patch removes the assumption in the current PSCI implementation that MPIDR based affinity levels map directly to levels in a power domain tree. This enables PSCI generic code to support complex power domain topologies as envisaged by PSCIv1.0 specification. The platform interface for querying the power domain topology has been changed such that: 1. The generic PSCI code does not generate MPIDRs and use them to query the platform about the number of power domains at a particular power level. The platform now provides a description of the power domain tree on the SoC through a data structure. The existing platform APIs to provide the same information have been removed. 2. The linear indices returned by plat_core_pos_by_mpidr() and plat_my_core_pos() are used to retrieve core power domain nodes from the power domain tree. Power domains above the core level are accessed using a &#39;parent&#39; field in the tree node descriptors. The platform describes the power domain tree in an array of &#39;unsigned char&#39;s. The first entry in the array specifies the number of power domains at the highest power level implemented in the system. Each susbsequent entry corresponds to a power domain and contains the number of power domains that are its direct children. This array is exported to the generic PSCI implementation via the new `plat_get_power_domain_tree_desc()` platform API. The PSCI generic code uses this array to populate its internal power domain tree using the Breadth First Search like algorithm. The tree is split into two arrays: 1. An array that contains all the core power domain nodes 2. An array that contains all the other power domain nodes A separate array for core nodes allows certain core specific optimisations to be implemented e.g. remove the bakery lock, re-use per-cpu data framework for storing some information. Entries in the core power domain array are allocated such that the array index of the domain is equal to the linear index returned by plat_core_pos_by_mpidr() and plat_my_core_pos() for the MPIDR corresponding to that domain. This relationship is key to be able to use an MPIDR to find the corresponding core power domain node, traverse to higher power domain nodes and index into arrays that contain core specific information. An introductory document has been added to briefly describe the new interface. Change-Id: I4b444719e8e927ba391cae48a23558308447da13
10 years ago
/*
* Lock the CPU spin lock to make sure that the context initialization
* is done. Since the lock is only used in this function to create
* a synchronization point with cpu_on_start(), it can be released
* immediately.
*/
psci_spin_lock_cpu(cpu_idx);
psci_spin_unlock_cpu(cpu_idx);
PSCI: Add framework to handle composite power states The state-id field in the power-state parameter of a CPU_SUSPEND call can be used to describe composite power states specific to a platform. The current PSCI implementation does not interpret the state-id field. It relies on the target power level and the state type fields in the power-state parameter to perform state coordination and power management operations. The framework introduced in this patch allows the PSCI implementation to intepret generic global states like RUN, RETENTION or OFF from the State-ID to make global state coordination decisions and reduce the complexity of platform ports. It adds support to involve the platform in state coordination which facilitates the use of composite power states and improves the support for entering standby states at multiple power domains. The patch also includes support for extended state-id format for the power state parameter as specified by PSCIv1.0. The PSCI implementation now defines a generic representation of the power-state parameter. It depends on the platform port to convert the power-state parameter (possibly encoding a composite power state) passed in a CPU_SUSPEND call to this representation via the `validate_power_state()` plat_psci_ops handler. It is an array where each index corresponds to a power level. Each entry contains the local power state the power domain at that power level could enter. The meaning of the local power state values is platform defined, and may vary between levels in a single platform. The PSCI implementation constrains the values only so that it can classify the state as RUN, RETENTION or OFF as required by the specification: * zero means RUN * all OFF state values at all levels must be higher than all RETENTION state values at all levels * the platform provides PLAT_MAX_RET_STATE and PLAT_MAX_OFF_STATE values to the framework The platform also must define the macros PLAT_MAX_RET_STATE and PLAT_MAX_OFF_STATE which lets the PSCI implementation find out which power domains have been requested to enter a retention or power down state. The PSCI implementation does not interpret the local power states defined by the platform. The only constraint is that the PLAT_MAX_RET_STATE &lt; PLAT_MAX_OFF_STATE. For a power domain tree, the generic implementation maintains an array of local power states. These are the states requested for each power domain by all the cores contained within the domain. During a request to place multiple power domains in a low power state, the platform is passed an array of requested power-states for each power domain through the plat_get_target_pwr_state() API. It coordinates amongst these states to determine a target local power state for the power domain. A default weak implementation of this API is provided in the platform layer which returns the minimum of the requested power-states back to the PSCI state coordination. Finally, the plat_psci_ops power management handlers are passed the target local power states for each affected power domain using the generic representation described above. The platform executes operations specific to these target states. The platform power management handler for placing a power domain in a standby state (plat_pm_ops_t.pwr_domain_standby()) is now only used as a fast path for placing a core power domain into a standby or retention state should now be used to only place the core power domain in a standby or retention state. The extended state-id power state format can be enabled by setting the build flag PSCI_EXTENDED_STATE_ID=1 and it is disabled by default. Change-Id: I9d4123d97e179529802c1f589baaa4101759d80c
10 years ago
/* Ensure we have been explicitly woken up by another cpu */
assert(psci_get_aff_info_state() == AFF_STATE_ON_PENDING);
/*
* Call the cpu on finish handler registered by the Secure Payload
* Dispatcher to let it do any bookeeping. If the handler encounters an
* error, it's expected to assert within
*/
if ((psci_spd_pm != NULL) && (psci_spd_pm->svc_on_finish != NULL))
psci_spd_pm->svc_on_finish(0);
PUBLISH_EVENT(psci_cpu_on_finish);
PSCI: Introduce new platform interface to describe topology This patch removes the assumption in the current PSCI implementation that MPIDR based affinity levels map directly to levels in a power domain tree. This enables PSCI generic code to support complex power domain topologies as envisaged by PSCIv1.0 specification. The platform interface for querying the power domain topology has been changed such that: 1. The generic PSCI code does not generate MPIDRs and use them to query the platform about the number of power domains at a particular power level. The platform now provides a description of the power domain tree on the SoC through a data structure. The existing platform APIs to provide the same information have been removed. 2. The linear indices returned by plat_core_pos_by_mpidr() and plat_my_core_pos() are used to retrieve core power domain nodes from the power domain tree. Power domains above the core level are accessed using a &#39;parent&#39; field in the tree node descriptors. The platform describes the power domain tree in an array of &#39;unsigned char&#39;s. The first entry in the array specifies the number of power domains at the highest power level implemented in the system. Each susbsequent entry corresponds to a power domain and contains the number of power domains that are its direct children. This array is exported to the generic PSCI implementation via the new `plat_get_power_domain_tree_desc()` platform API. The PSCI generic code uses this array to populate its internal power domain tree using the Breadth First Search like algorithm. The tree is split into two arrays: 1. An array that contains all the core power domain nodes 2. An array that contains all the other power domain nodes A separate array for core nodes allows certain core specific optimisations to be implemented e.g. remove the bakery lock, re-use per-cpu data framework for storing some information. Entries in the core power domain array are allocated such that the array index of the domain is equal to the linear index returned by plat_core_pos_by_mpidr() and plat_my_core_pos() for the MPIDR corresponding to that domain. This relationship is key to be able to use an MPIDR to find the corresponding core power domain node, traverse to higher power domain nodes and index into arrays that contain core specific information. An introductory document has been added to briefly describe the new interface. Change-Id: I4b444719e8e927ba391cae48a23558308447da13
10 years ago
/* Populate the mpidr field within the cpu node array */
/* This needs to be done only once */
psci_cpu_pd_nodes[cpu_idx].mpidr = read_mpidr() & MPIDR_AFFINITY_MASK;
/*
* Generic management: Now we just need to retrieve the
* information that we had stashed away during the cpu_on
* call to set this cpu on its way.
*/
cm_prepare_el3_exit(NON_SECURE);
}