You can not select more than 25 topics
Topics must start with a letter or number, can include dashes ('-') and can be up to 35 characters long.
166 lines
6.5 KiB
166 lines
6.5 KiB
5 years ago
|
TF-A CMake buildsystem
|
||
|
======================
|
||
|
|
||
|
:Author: Balint Dobszay
|
||
|
:Organization: Arm Limited
|
||
|
:Contact: Balint Dobszay <balint.dobszay@arm.com>
|
||
|
:Status: Accepted
|
||
|
|
||
|
.. contents:: Table of Contents
|
||
|
|
||
|
Abstract
|
||
|
--------
|
||
|
This document presents a proposal for a new buildsystem for TF-A using CMake,
|
||
|
and as part of this a reusable CMake framework for embedded projects. For a
|
||
|
summary about the proposal, please see the `Phabricator wiki page
|
||
|
<https://developer.trustedfirmware.org/w/tf_a/cmake-buildsystem-proposal/>`_. As
|
||
|
mentioned there, the proposal consists of two phases. The subject of this
|
||
|
document is the first phase only.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Introduction
|
||
|
------------
|
||
|
The current Makefile based buildsystem of TF-A has become complicated and hard
|
||
|
to maintain, there is a need for a new, more flexible solution. The proposal is
|
||
|
to use CMake language for the new buildsystem. The main reasons of this decision
|
||
|
are the following:
|
||
|
|
||
|
* It is a well-established, mature tool, widely accepted by open-source
|
||
|
projects.
|
||
|
* TF-M is already using CMake, reducing fragmentation for tf.org projects can be
|
||
|
beneficial.
|
||
|
* CMake has various advantages over Make, e.g.:
|
||
|
|
||
|
* Host and target system agnostic project.
|
||
|
* CMake project is scalable, supports project modularization.
|
||
|
* Supports software integration.
|
||
|
* Out-of-the-box support for integration with several tools (e.g. project
|
||
|
generation for various IDEs, integration with cppcheck, etc).
|
||
|
|
||
|
Of course there are drawbacks too:
|
||
|
|
||
|
* Language is problematic (e.g. variable scope).
|
||
|
* Not embedded approach.
|
||
|
|
||
|
To overcome these and other problems, we need to create workarounds for some
|
||
|
tasks, wrap CMake functions, etc. Since this functionality can be useful in
|
||
|
other embedded projects too, it is beneficial to collect the new code into a
|
||
|
reusable framework and store this in a separate repository. The following
|
||
|
diagram provides an overview of the framework structure:
|
||
|
|
||
|
|Framework structure|
|
||
|
|
||
|
Main features
|
||
|
-------------
|
||
|
|
||
|
Structured configuration description
|
||
|
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
||
|
In the current Makefile system the build configuration description, validation,
|
||
|
processing, and the target creation, source file description are mixed and
|
||
|
spread across several files. One of the goals of the framework is to organize
|
||
|
this.
|
||
|
|
||
|
The framework provides a solution to describe the input build parameters, flags,
|
||
|
macros, etc. in a structured way. It contains two utilities for this purpose:
|
||
|
|
||
|
* Map: simple key-value pair implementation.
|
||
|
* Group: collection of related maps.
|
||
|
|
||
|
The related parameters shall be packed into a group (or "setting group"). The
|
||
|
setting groups shall be defined and filled with content in config files.
|
||
|
Currently the config files are created and edited manually, but later a
|
||
|
configuration management tool (e.g. Kconfig) shall be used to generate these
|
||
|
files. Therefore, the framework does not contain parameter validation and
|
||
|
conflict checking, these shall be handled by the configuration tool.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Target description
|
||
|
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
||
|
The framework provides an API called STGT ('simple target') to describe the
|
||
|
targets, i.e. what is the build output, what source files are used, what
|
||
|
libraries are linked, etc. The API wraps the CMake target functions, and also
|
||
|
extends the built-in functionality, it can use the setting groups described in
|
||
|
the previous section. A group can be applied onto a target, i.e. a collection of
|
||
|
macros, flags, etc. can be applied onto the given output executable/library.
|
||
|
This provides a more granular way than the current Makefile system where most of
|
||
|
these are global and applied onto each target.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Compiler abstraction
|
||
|
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
||
|
Apart from the built-in CMake usage of the compiler, there are some common tasks
|
||
|
that CMake does not solve (e.g. preprocessing a file). For these tasks the
|
||
|
framework uses wrapper functions instead of direct calls to the compiler. This
|
||
|
way it is not tied to one specific compiler.
|
||
|
|
||
|
External tools
|
||
|
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
||
|
In the TF-A buildsystem some external tools are used, e.g. fiptool for image
|
||
|
generation or dtc for device tree compilation. These tools have to be found
|
||
|
and/or built by the framework. For this, the CMake find_package functionality is
|
||
|
used, any other necessary tools can be added later.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Workflow
|
||
|
--------
|
||
|
The following diagram demonstrates the development workflow using the framework:
|
||
|
|
||
|
|Framework workflow|
|
||
|
|
||
|
The process can be split into two main phases:
|
||
|
|
||
|
In the provisioning phase, first we have to obtain the necessary resources, i.e.
|
||
|
clone the code repository and other dependencies. Next we have to do the
|
||
|
configuration, preferably using a config tool like KConfig.
|
||
|
|
||
|
In the development phase first we run CMake, which will generate the buildsystem
|
||
|
using the selected generator backend (currently only the Makefile generator is
|
||
|
supported). After this we run the selected build tool which in turn calls the
|
||
|
compiler, linker, packaging tool, etc. Finally we can run and debug the output
|
||
|
executables.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Usually during development only the steps in this second phase have to be
|
||
|
repeated, while the provisioning phase needs to be done only once (or rarely).
|
||
|
|
||
|
Example
|
||
|
-------
|
||
|
This is a short example for the basic framework usage.
|
||
|
|
||
|
First, we create a setting group called *mem_conf* and fill it with several
|
||
|
parameters. It is worth noting the difference between *CONFIG* and *DEFINE*
|
||
|
types: the former is only a CMake domain option, the latter is only a C language
|
||
|
macro.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Next, we create a target called *fw1* and add the *mem_conf* setting group to
|
||
|
it. This means that all source and header files used by the target will have all
|
||
|
the parameters declared in the setting group. Then we set the target type to
|
||
|
executable, and add some source files. Since the target has the parameters from
|
||
|
the settings group, we can use it for conditionally adding source files. E.g.
|
||
|
*dram_controller.c* will only be added if MEM_TYPE equals dram.
|
||
|
|
||
|
.. code-block:: cmake
|
||
|
|
||
|
group_new(NAME mem_conf)
|
||
|
group_add(NAME mem_conf TYPE DEFINE KEY MEM_SIZE VAL 1024)
|
||
|
group_add(NAME mem_conf TYPE CONFIG DEFINE KEY MEM_TYPE VAL dram)
|
||
|
group_add(NAME mem_conf TYPE CFLAG KEY -Os)
|
||
|
|
||
|
stgt_create(NAME fw1)
|
||
|
stgt_add_setting(NAME fw1 GROUPS mem_conf)
|
||
|
stgt_set_target(NAME fw1 TYPE exe)
|
||
|
|
||
|
stgt_add_src(NAME fw1 SRC
|
||
|
${CMAKE_SOURCE_DIR}/main.c
|
||
|
)
|
||
|
|
||
|
stgt_add_src_cond(NAME fw1 KEY MEM_TYPE VAL dram SRC
|
||
|
${CMAKE_SOURCE_DIR}/dram_controller.c
|
||
|
)
|
||
|
|
||
|
.. |Framework structure| image::
|
||
|
../resources/diagrams/cmake_framework_structure.png
|
||
|
:width: 75 %
|
||
|
|
||
|
.. |Framework workflow| image::
|
||
|
../resources/diagrams/cmake_framework_workflow.png
|
||
|
|
||
|
--------------
|
||
|
|
||
|
*Copyright (c) 2019-2020, Arm Limited and Contributors. All rights reserved.*
|