|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* Copyright (c) 2013-2015, ARM Limited and Contributors. All rights reserved.
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* SPDX-License-Identifier: BSD-3-Clause
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#include <arch_helpers.h>
|
|
|
|
#include <assert.h>
|
|
|
|
#include <bakery_lock.h>
|
|
|
|
#include <cpu_data.h>
|
|
|
|
#include <platform.h>
|
|
|
|
#include <string.h>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* Functions in this file implement Bakery Algorithm for mutual exclusion with the
|
|
|
|
* bakery lock data structures in coherent memory.
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* ARM architecture offers a family of exclusive access instructions to
|
|
|
|
* efficiently implement mutual exclusion with hardware support. However, as
|
|
|
|
* well as depending on external hardware, the these instructions have defined
|
|
|
|
* behavior only on certain memory types (cacheable and Normal memory in
|
|
|
|
* particular; see ARMv8 Architecture Reference Manual section B2.10). Use cases
|
|
|
|
* in trusted firmware are such that mutual exclusion implementation cannot
|
|
|
|
* expect that accesses to the lock have the specific type required by the
|
|
|
|
* architecture for these primitives to function (for example, not all
|
|
|
|
* contenders may have address translation enabled).
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* This implementation does not use mutual exclusion primitives. It expects
|
|
|
|
* memory regions where the locks reside to be fully ordered and coherent
|
|
|
|
* (either by disabling address translation, or by assigning proper attributes
|
|
|
|
* when translation is enabled).
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* Note that the ARM architecture guarantees single-copy atomicity for aligned
|
|
|
|
* accesses regardless of status of address translation.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#define assert_bakery_entry_valid(entry, bakery) do { \
|
|
|
|
assert(bakery); \
|
|
|
|
assert(entry < BAKERY_LOCK_MAX_CPUS); \
|
|
|
|
} while (0)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* Obtain a ticket for a given CPU */
|
|
|
|
static unsigned int bakery_get_ticket(bakery_lock_t *bakery, unsigned int me)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
unsigned int my_ticket, their_ticket;
|
|
|
|
unsigned int they;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* Prevent recursive acquisition */
|
|
|
|
assert(!bakery_ticket_number(bakery->lock_data[me]));
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* Flag that we're busy getting our ticket. All CPUs are iterated in the
|
|
|
|
* order of their ordinal position to decide the maximum ticket value
|
|
|
|
* observed so far. Our priority is set to be greater than the maximum
|
|
|
|
* observed priority
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* Note that it's possible that more than one contender gets the same
|
|
|
|
* ticket value. That's OK as the lock is acquired based on the priority
|
|
|
|
* value, not the ticket value alone.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
my_ticket = 0;
|
|
|
|
bakery->lock_data[me] = make_bakery_data(CHOOSING_TICKET, my_ticket);
|
|
|
|
for (they = 0; they < BAKERY_LOCK_MAX_CPUS; they++) {
|
|
|
|
their_ticket = bakery_ticket_number(bakery->lock_data[they]);
|
|
|
|
if (their_ticket > my_ticket)
|
|
|
|
my_ticket = their_ticket;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* Compute ticket; then signal to other contenders waiting for us to
|
|
|
|
* finish calculating our ticket value that we're done
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
++my_ticket;
|
|
|
|
bakery->lock_data[me] = make_bakery_data(CHOSEN_TICKET, my_ticket);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return my_ticket;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* Acquire bakery lock
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* Contending CPUs need first obtain a non-zero ticket and then calculate
|
|
|
|
* priority value. A contending CPU iterate over all other CPUs in the platform,
|
|
|
|
* which may be contending for the same lock, in the order of their ordinal
|
|
|
|
* position (CPU0, CPU1 and so on). A non-contending CPU will have its ticket
|
|
|
|
* (and priority) value as 0. The contending CPU compares its priority with that
|
|
|
|
* of others'. The CPU with the highest priority (lowest numerical value)
|
|
|
|
* acquires the lock
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
void bakery_lock_get(bakery_lock_t *bakery)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
unsigned int they, me;
|
|
|
|
unsigned int my_ticket, my_prio, their_ticket;
|
|
|
|
unsigned int their_bakery_data;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
me = plat_my_core_pos();
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
assert_bakery_entry_valid(me, bakery);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* Get a ticket */
|
|
|
|
my_ticket = bakery_get_ticket(bakery, me);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* Now that we got our ticket, compute our priority value, then compare
|
|
|
|
* with that of others, and proceed to acquire the lock
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
my_prio = PRIORITY(my_ticket, me);
|
|
|
|
for (they = 0; they < BAKERY_LOCK_MAX_CPUS; they++) {
|
|
|
|
if (me == they)
|
|
|
|
continue;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* Wait for the contender to get their ticket */
|
|
|
|
do {
|
|
|
|
their_bakery_data = bakery->lock_data[they];
|
|
|
|
} while (bakery_is_choosing(their_bakery_data));
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* If the other party is a contender, they'll have non-zero
|
|
|
|
* (valid) ticket value. If they do, compare priorities
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
their_ticket = bakery_ticket_number(their_bakery_data);
|
|
|
|
if (their_ticket && (PRIORITY(their_ticket, they) < my_prio)) {
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* They have higher priority (lower value). Wait for
|
|
|
|
* their ticket value to change (either release the lock
|
|
|
|
* to have it dropped to 0; or drop and probably content
|
|
|
|
* again for the same lock to have an even higher value)
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
do {
|
|
|
|
wfe();
|
|
|
|
} while (their_ticket ==
|
|
|
|
bakery_ticket_number(bakery->lock_data[they]));
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/* Lock acquired */
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* Release the lock and signal contenders */
|
|
|
|
void bakery_lock_release(bakery_lock_t *bakery)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
unsigned int me = plat_my_core_pos();
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
assert_bakery_entry_valid(me, bakery);
|
|
|
|
assert(bakery_ticket_number(bakery->lock_data[me]));
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* Release lock by resetting ticket. Then signal other
|
|
|
|
* waiting contenders
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
bakery->lock_data[me] = 0;
|
|
|
|
dsb();
|
|
|
|
sev();
|
|
|
|
}
|