|
|
|
use proptest::prelude::*;
|
|
|
|
use wiggle::{GuestMemory, GuestType};
|
|
|
|
use wiggle_test::{impl_errno, HostMemory, MemArea, WasiCtx};
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
const FD_VAL: u32 = 123;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
wiggle::from_witx!({
|
|
|
|
witx: ["tests/handles.witx"],
|
|
|
|
ctx: WasiCtx,
|
|
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
impl_errno!(types::Errno, types::GuestErrorConversion);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
impl<'a> handle_examples::HandleExamples for WasiCtx<'a> {
|
|
|
|
fn fd_create(&self) -> Result<types::Fd, types::Errno> {
|
|
|
|
Ok(types::Fd::from(FD_VAL))
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
fn fd_consume(&self, fd: types::Fd) -> Result<(), types::Errno> {
|
|
|
|
println!("FD_CONSUME {}", fd);
|
|
|
|
if fd == types::Fd::from(FD_VAL) {
|
|
|
|
Ok(())
|
|
|
|
} else {
|
|
|
|
Err(types::Errno::InvalidArg)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#[derive(Debug)]
|
|
|
|
struct HandleExercise {
|
|
|
|
pub return_loc: MemArea,
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
impl HandleExercise {
|
|
|
|
pub fn test(&self) {
|
Rewrite for recursive safety
This commit rewrites the runtime crate to provide safety in the face
of recursive calls to the guest. The basic principle is that
`GuestMemory` is now a trait which dynamically returns the
pointer/length pair. This also has an implicit contract (hence the
`unsafe` trait) that the pointer/length pair point to a valid list of
bytes in host memory "until something is reentrant".
After this changes the various suite of `Guest*` types were rewritten.
`GuestRef` and `GuestRefMut` were both removed since they cannot safely
exist. The `GuestPtrMut` type was removed for simplicity, and the final
`GuestPtr` type subsumes `GuestString` and `GuestArray`. This means
that there's only one guest pointer type, `GuestPtr<'a, T>`, where `'a`
is the borrow into host memory, basically borrowing the `GuestMemory`
trait object itself.
Some core utilities are exposed on `GuestPtr`, but they're all 100%
safe. Unsafety is now entirely contained within a few small locations:
* Implementations of the `GuestType` for primitive types (e.g. `i8`,
`u8`, etc) use `unsafe` to read/write memory. The `unsafe` trait of
`GuestMemory` though should prove that they're safe.
* `GuestPtr<'_, str>` has a method which validates utf-8 contents, and
this requires `unsafe` internally to read all the bytes. This is
guaranteed to be safe however given the contract of `GuestMemory`.
And that's it! Everything else is a bunch of safe combinators all built
up on the various utilities provided by `GuestPtr`. The general idioms
are roughly the same as before, with various tweaks here and there. A
summary of expected idioms are:
* For small values you'd `.read()` or `.write()` very quickly. You'd
pass around the type itself.
* For strings, you'd pass `GuestPtr<'_, str>` down to the point where
it's actually consumed. At that moment you'd either decide to copy it
out (a safe operation) or you'd get a raw view to the string (an
unsafe operation) and assert that you won't call back into wasm while
you're holding that pointer.
* Arrays are similar to strings, passing around `GuestPtr<'_, [T]>`.
Arrays also have a `iter()` method which yields an iterator of
`GuestPtr<'_, T>` for convenience.
Overall there's still a lot of missing documentation on the runtime
crate specifically around the safety of the `GuestMemory` trait as well
as how the utilities/methods are expected to be used. Additionally
there's utilities which aren't currently implemented which would be easy
to implement. For example there's no method to copy out a string or a
slice, although that would be pretty easy to add.
In any case I'm curious to get feedback on this approach and see what
y'all think!
5 years ago
|
|
|
let ctx = WasiCtx::new();
|
|
|
|
let host_memory = HostMemory::new();
|
|
|
|
|
Rewrite for recursive safety
This commit rewrites the runtime crate to provide safety in the face
of recursive calls to the guest. The basic principle is that
`GuestMemory` is now a trait which dynamically returns the
pointer/length pair. This also has an implicit contract (hence the
`unsafe` trait) that the pointer/length pair point to a valid list of
bytes in host memory "until something is reentrant".
After this changes the various suite of `Guest*` types were rewritten.
`GuestRef` and `GuestRefMut` were both removed since they cannot safely
exist. The `GuestPtrMut` type was removed for simplicity, and the final
`GuestPtr` type subsumes `GuestString` and `GuestArray`. This means
that there's only one guest pointer type, `GuestPtr<'a, T>`, where `'a`
is the borrow into host memory, basically borrowing the `GuestMemory`
trait object itself.
Some core utilities are exposed on `GuestPtr`, but they're all 100%
safe. Unsafety is now entirely contained within a few small locations:
* Implementations of the `GuestType` for primitive types (e.g. `i8`,
`u8`, etc) use `unsafe` to read/write memory. The `unsafe` trait of
`GuestMemory` though should prove that they're safe.
* `GuestPtr<'_, str>` has a method which validates utf-8 contents, and
this requires `unsafe` internally to read all the bytes. This is
guaranteed to be safe however given the contract of `GuestMemory`.
And that's it! Everything else is a bunch of safe combinators all built
up on the various utilities provided by `GuestPtr`. The general idioms
are roughly the same as before, with various tweaks here and there. A
summary of expected idioms are:
* For small values you'd `.read()` or `.write()` very quickly. You'd
pass around the type itself.
* For strings, you'd pass `GuestPtr<'_, str>` down to the point where
it's actually consumed. At that moment you'd either decide to copy it
out (a safe operation) or you'd get a raw view to the string (an
unsafe operation) and assert that you won't call back into wasm while
you're holding that pointer.
* Arrays are similar to strings, passing around `GuestPtr<'_, [T]>`.
Arrays also have a `iter()` method which yields an iterator of
`GuestPtr<'_, T>` for convenience.
Overall there's still a lot of missing documentation on the runtime
crate specifically around the safety of the `GuestMemory` trait as well
as how the utilities/methods are expected to be used. Additionally
there's utilities which aren't currently implemented which would be easy
to implement. For example there's no method to copy out a string or a
slice, although that would be pretty easy to add.
In any case I'm curious to get feedback on this approach and see what
y'all think!
5 years ago
|
|
|
let e = handle_examples::fd_create(&ctx, &host_memory, self.return_loc.ptr as i32);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(e, types::Errno::Ok.into(), "fd_create error");
|
|
|
|
|
Rewrite for recursive safety
This commit rewrites the runtime crate to provide safety in the face
of recursive calls to the guest. The basic principle is that
`GuestMemory` is now a trait which dynamically returns the
pointer/length pair. This also has an implicit contract (hence the
`unsafe` trait) that the pointer/length pair point to a valid list of
bytes in host memory "until something is reentrant".
After this changes the various suite of `Guest*` types were rewritten.
`GuestRef` and `GuestRefMut` were both removed since they cannot safely
exist. The `GuestPtrMut` type was removed for simplicity, and the final
`GuestPtr` type subsumes `GuestString` and `GuestArray`. This means
that there's only one guest pointer type, `GuestPtr<'a, T>`, where `'a`
is the borrow into host memory, basically borrowing the `GuestMemory`
trait object itself.
Some core utilities are exposed on `GuestPtr`, but they're all 100%
safe. Unsafety is now entirely contained within a few small locations:
* Implementations of the `GuestType` for primitive types (e.g. `i8`,
`u8`, etc) use `unsafe` to read/write memory. The `unsafe` trait of
`GuestMemory` though should prove that they're safe.
* `GuestPtr<'_, str>` has a method which validates utf-8 contents, and
this requires `unsafe` internally to read all the bytes. This is
guaranteed to be safe however given the contract of `GuestMemory`.
And that's it! Everything else is a bunch of safe combinators all built
up on the various utilities provided by `GuestPtr`. The general idioms
are roughly the same as before, with various tweaks here and there. A
summary of expected idioms are:
* For small values you'd `.read()` or `.write()` very quickly. You'd
pass around the type itself.
* For strings, you'd pass `GuestPtr<'_, str>` down to the point where
it's actually consumed. At that moment you'd either decide to copy it
out (a safe operation) or you'd get a raw view to the string (an
unsafe operation) and assert that you won't call back into wasm while
you're holding that pointer.
* Arrays are similar to strings, passing around `GuestPtr<'_, [T]>`.
Arrays also have a `iter()` method which yields an iterator of
`GuestPtr<'_, T>` for convenience.
Overall there's still a lot of missing documentation on the runtime
crate specifically around the safety of the `GuestMemory` trait as well
as how the utilities/methods are expected to be used. Additionally
there's utilities which aren't currently implemented which would be easy
to implement. For example there's no method to copy out a string or a
slice, although that would be pretty easy to add.
In any case I'm curious to get feedback on this approach and see what
y'all think!
5 years ago
|
|
|
let h_got: u32 = host_memory
|
|
|
|
.ptr(self.return_loc.ptr)
|
Rewrite for recursive safety
This commit rewrites the runtime crate to provide safety in the face
of recursive calls to the guest. The basic principle is that
`GuestMemory` is now a trait which dynamically returns the
pointer/length pair. This also has an implicit contract (hence the
`unsafe` trait) that the pointer/length pair point to a valid list of
bytes in host memory "until something is reentrant".
After this changes the various suite of `Guest*` types were rewritten.
`GuestRef` and `GuestRefMut` were both removed since they cannot safely
exist. The `GuestPtrMut` type was removed for simplicity, and the final
`GuestPtr` type subsumes `GuestString` and `GuestArray`. This means
that there's only one guest pointer type, `GuestPtr<'a, T>`, where `'a`
is the borrow into host memory, basically borrowing the `GuestMemory`
trait object itself.
Some core utilities are exposed on `GuestPtr`, but they're all 100%
safe. Unsafety is now entirely contained within a few small locations:
* Implementations of the `GuestType` for primitive types (e.g. `i8`,
`u8`, etc) use `unsafe` to read/write memory. The `unsafe` trait of
`GuestMemory` though should prove that they're safe.
* `GuestPtr<'_, str>` has a method which validates utf-8 contents, and
this requires `unsafe` internally to read all the bytes. This is
guaranteed to be safe however given the contract of `GuestMemory`.
And that's it! Everything else is a bunch of safe combinators all built
up on the various utilities provided by `GuestPtr`. The general idioms
are roughly the same as before, with various tweaks here and there. A
summary of expected idioms are:
* For small values you'd `.read()` or `.write()` very quickly. You'd
pass around the type itself.
* For strings, you'd pass `GuestPtr<'_, str>` down to the point where
it's actually consumed. At that moment you'd either decide to copy it
out (a safe operation) or you'd get a raw view to the string (an
unsafe operation) and assert that you won't call back into wasm while
you're holding that pointer.
* Arrays are similar to strings, passing around `GuestPtr<'_, [T]>`.
Arrays also have a `iter()` method which yields an iterator of
`GuestPtr<'_, T>` for convenience.
Overall there's still a lot of missing documentation on the runtime
crate specifically around the safety of the `GuestMemory` trait as well
as how the utilities/methods are expected to be used. Additionally
there's utilities which aren't currently implemented which would be easy
to implement. For example there's no method to copy out a string or a
slice, although that would be pretty easy to add.
In any case I'm curious to get feedback on this approach and see what
y'all think!
5 years ago
|
|
|
.read()
|
|
|
|
.expect("return ref_mut");
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(h_got, 123, "fd_create return val");
|
|
|
|
|
Rewrite for recursive safety
This commit rewrites the runtime crate to provide safety in the face
of recursive calls to the guest. The basic principle is that
`GuestMemory` is now a trait which dynamically returns the
pointer/length pair. This also has an implicit contract (hence the
`unsafe` trait) that the pointer/length pair point to a valid list of
bytes in host memory "until something is reentrant".
After this changes the various suite of `Guest*` types were rewritten.
`GuestRef` and `GuestRefMut` were both removed since they cannot safely
exist. The `GuestPtrMut` type was removed for simplicity, and the final
`GuestPtr` type subsumes `GuestString` and `GuestArray`. This means
that there's only one guest pointer type, `GuestPtr<'a, T>`, where `'a`
is the borrow into host memory, basically borrowing the `GuestMemory`
trait object itself.
Some core utilities are exposed on `GuestPtr`, but they're all 100%
safe. Unsafety is now entirely contained within a few small locations:
* Implementations of the `GuestType` for primitive types (e.g. `i8`,
`u8`, etc) use `unsafe` to read/write memory. The `unsafe` trait of
`GuestMemory` though should prove that they're safe.
* `GuestPtr<'_, str>` has a method which validates utf-8 contents, and
this requires `unsafe` internally to read all the bytes. This is
guaranteed to be safe however given the contract of `GuestMemory`.
And that's it! Everything else is a bunch of safe combinators all built
up on the various utilities provided by `GuestPtr`. The general idioms
are roughly the same as before, with various tweaks here and there. A
summary of expected idioms are:
* For small values you'd `.read()` or `.write()` very quickly. You'd
pass around the type itself.
* For strings, you'd pass `GuestPtr<'_, str>` down to the point where
it's actually consumed. At that moment you'd either decide to copy it
out (a safe operation) or you'd get a raw view to the string (an
unsafe operation) and assert that you won't call back into wasm while
you're holding that pointer.
* Arrays are similar to strings, passing around `GuestPtr<'_, [T]>`.
Arrays also have a `iter()` method which yields an iterator of
`GuestPtr<'_, T>` for convenience.
Overall there's still a lot of missing documentation on the runtime
crate specifically around the safety of the `GuestMemory` trait as well
as how the utilities/methods are expected to be used. Additionally
there's utilities which aren't currently implemented which would be easy
to implement. For example there's no method to copy out a string or a
slice, although that would be pretty easy to add.
In any case I'm curious to get feedback on this approach and see what
y'all think!
5 years ago
|
|
|
let e = handle_examples::fd_consume(&ctx, &host_memory, h_got as i32);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(e, types::Errno::Ok.into(), "fd_consume error");
|
|
|
|
|
Rewrite for recursive safety
This commit rewrites the runtime crate to provide safety in the face
of recursive calls to the guest. The basic principle is that
`GuestMemory` is now a trait which dynamically returns the
pointer/length pair. This also has an implicit contract (hence the
`unsafe` trait) that the pointer/length pair point to a valid list of
bytes in host memory "until something is reentrant".
After this changes the various suite of `Guest*` types were rewritten.
`GuestRef` and `GuestRefMut` were both removed since they cannot safely
exist. The `GuestPtrMut` type was removed for simplicity, and the final
`GuestPtr` type subsumes `GuestString` and `GuestArray`. This means
that there's only one guest pointer type, `GuestPtr<'a, T>`, where `'a`
is the borrow into host memory, basically borrowing the `GuestMemory`
trait object itself.
Some core utilities are exposed on `GuestPtr`, but they're all 100%
safe. Unsafety is now entirely contained within a few small locations:
* Implementations of the `GuestType` for primitive types (e.g. `i8`,
`u8`, etc) use `unsafe` to read/write memory. The `unsafe` trait of
`GuestMemory` though should prove that they're safe.
* `GuestPtr<'_, str>` has a method which validates utf-8 contents, and
this requires `unsafe` internally to read all the bytes. This is
guaranteed to be safe however given the contract of `GuestMemory`.
And that's it! Everything else is a bunch of safe combinators all built
up on the various utilities provided by `GuestPtr`. The general idioms
are roughly the same as before, with various tweaks here and there. A
summary of expected idioms are:
* For small values you'd `.read()` or `.write()` very quickly. You'd
pass around the type itself.
* For strings, you'd pass `GuestPtr<'_, str>` down to the point where
it's actually consumed. At that moment you'd either decide to copy it
out (a safe operation) or you'd get a raw view to the string (an
unsafe operation) and assert that you won't call back into wasm while
you're holding that pointer.
* Arrays are similar to strings, passing around `GuestPtr<'_, [T]>`.
Arrays also have a `iter()` method which yields an iterator of
`GuestPtr<'_, T>` for convenience.
Overall there's still a lot of missing documentation on the runtime
crate specifically around the safety of the `GuestMemory` trait as well
as how the utilities/methods are expected to be used. Additionally
there's utilities which aren't currently implemented which would be easy
to implement. For example there's no method to copy out a string or a
slice, although that would be pretty easy to add.
In any case I'm curious to get feedback on this approach and see what
y'all think!
5 years ago
|
|
|
let e = handle_examples::fd_consume(&ctx, &host_memory, h_got as i32 + 1);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
|
|
e,
|
|
|
|
types::Errno::InvalidArg.into(),
|
|
|
|
"fd_consume invalid error"
|
|
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
pub fn strat() -> BoxedStrategy<Self> {
|
Rewrite for recursive safety
This commit rewrites the runtime crate to provide safety in the face
of recursive calls to the guest. The basic principle is that
`GuestMemory` is now a trait which dynamically returns the
pointer/length pair. This also has an implicit contract (hence the
`unsafe` trait) that the pointer/length pair point to a valid list of
bytes in host memory "until something is reentrant".
After this changes the various suite of `Guest*` types were rewritten.
`GuestRef` and `GuestRefMut` were both removed since they cannot safely
exist. The `GuestPtrMut` type was removed for simplicity, and the final
`GuestPtr` type subsumes `GuestString` and `GuestArray`. This means
that there's only one guest pointer type, `GuestPtr<'a, T>`, where `'a`
is the borrow into host memory, basically borrowing the `GuestMemory`
trait object itself.
Some core utilities are exposed on `GuestPtr`, but they're all 100%
safe. Unsafety is now entirely contained within a few small locations:
* Implementations of the `GuestType` for primitive types (e.g. `i8`,
`u8`, etc) use `unsafe` to read/write memory. The `unsafe` trait of
`GuestMemory` though should prove that they're safe.
* `GuestPtr<'_, str>` has a method which validates utf-8 contents, and
this requires `unsafe` internally to read all the bytes. This is
guaranteed to be safe however given the contract of `GuestMemory`.
And that's it! Everything else is a bunch of safe combinators all built
up on the various utilities provided by `GuestPtr`. The general idioms
are roughly the same as before, with various tweaks here and there. A
summary of expected idioms are:
* For small values you'd `.read()` or `.write()` very quickly. You'd
pass around the type itself.
* For strings, you'd pass `GuestPtr<'_, str>` down to the point where
it's actually consumed. At that moment you'd either decide to copy it
out (a safe operation) or you'd get a raw view to the string (an
unsafe operation) and assert that you won't call back into wasm while
you're holding that pointer.
* Arrays are similar to strings, passing around `GuestPtr<'_, [T]>`.
Arrays also have a `iter()` method which yields an iterator of
`GuestPtr<'_, T>` for convenience.
Overall there's still a lot of missing documentation on the runtime
crate specifically around the safety of the `GuestMemory` trait as well
as how the utilities/methods are expected to be used. Additionally
there's utilities which aren't currently implemented which would be easy
to implement. For example there's no method to copy out a string or a
slice, although that would be pretty easy to add.
In any case I'm curious to get feedback on this approach and see what
y'all think!
5 years ago
|
|
|
(HostMemory::mem_area_strat(types::Fd::guest_size()))
|
|
|
|
.prop_map(|return_loc| HandleExercise { return_loc })
|
|
|
|
.boxed()
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
proptest! {
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
|
|
fn handle_exercise(e in HandleExercise::strat()) {
|
|
|
|
e.test()
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|