You can not select more than 25 topics Topics must start with a letter or number, can include dashes ('-') and can be up to 35 characters long.

56 lines
1.5 KiB

Migrate from Azure Pipelines to Github Actions (#474) This commit migrates wasmtime's CI infrastructure from Azure Pipelines to Github Actions. Using Github Actions has a few benefits over other offerings: * Being natively integrated with Github means that there's no degree of user account configuration or access control management, it's all inherent via already existing Github permissions. * Github Actions gives 20 parallel builders instead of Azure's 10 by default, which is a nice boost to have! Overall I've found Github Actions to feel a bit cleaner than Azure Pipelines as well. Subjectively I've found the configuration to be more readable and more pleasant to work with, although they're both just as "powerful" I think. Additionally Github Actions has been pretty solid in my own personal testing for a number of other projects. The main trickiness with wasmtime's CI is the rolling `dev` release of the master branch as well as binary releases for tags. Github Actions doesn't have quite as much built in functionality as Azure Pipelines, but Github Actions does have a nice feature where you can define the code for an action locally rather than only using built-in actions. This migration adds three local actions with some associated JS code to run the action (currently it looks like it basically requires JS) * An `install-rust` action papers over the gotchas about installing Rust, allowing Rust installation to be a one-liner in the configuration. * A `binary-compatible-builds` action allows easily configuring the wheels and the binaries to be "more binary compatible" and handles things like compilation flags on OSX and Windows while handling the `centos:6` container on Linux. * The `github-release` action is the logic using the `@actions/github` JS package to orchestrate the custom way we manage rolling releases, ensuring that a new release is made for the master branch under `dev` (deleting the previous tag/release ahead of time) and then also manages tagged releases by uploading them there. I'm hoping that most of the inline actions here will largely go away. For example `install-rust` should be simply `rustup update $toolchain` once various environment issues are fixed on Github Actions runner images. Additionally `github-release` will ideally migrate to something like https://github.com/actions/create-release or similar once it has enough functionality. I'm also hoping that the maintenance in the meantime of these actions is pretty low-cost, but if it becomes an issue we can look into other solutions!
5 years ago
#!/bin/bash
# A small shell script invoked from CI on the final Linux builder which actually
# assembles the release artifacts for a particular platform. This will take the
# binary artifacts of previous builders and create associated tarballs to
# publish to GitHub.
#
# The first argument of this is the "platform" name to put into the tarball, and
# the second argument is the name of the github actions platform which is where
# we source binaries from. The final third argument is ".exe" on Windows to
# handle executable extensions right.
set -ex
platform=$1
src=$2
exe=$3
rm -rf tmp
mkdir tmp
mkdir -p dist
mktarball() {
dir=$1
if [ "$exe" = "" ]; then
tar cJf dist/$dir.tar.xz -C tmp $dir
else
(cd tmp && zip -r ../dist/$dir.zip $dir)
fi
}
# Create the main tarball of binaries
bin_pkgname=wasmtime-$TAG-$platform
mkdir tmp/$bin_pkgname
cp LICENSE README.md tmp/$bin_pkgname
Migrate from Azure Pipelines to Github Actions (#474) This commit migrates wasmtime's CI infrastructure from Azure Pipelines to Github Actions. Using Github Actions has a few benefits over other offerings: * Being natively integrated with Github means that there's no degree of user account configuration or access control management, it's all inherent via already existing Github permissions. * Github Actions gives 20 parallel builders instead of Azure's 10 by default, which is a nice boost to have! Overall I've found Github Actions to feel a bit cleaner than Azure Pipelines as well. Subjectively I've found the configuration to be more readable and more pleasant to work with, although they're both just as "powerful" I think. Additionally Github Actions has been pretty solid in my own personal testing for a number of other projects. The main trickiness with wasmtime's CI is the rolling `dev` release of the master branch as well as binary releases for tags. Github Actions doesn't have quite as much built in functionality as Azure Pipelines, but Github Actions does have a nice feature where you can define the code for an action locally rather than only using built-in actions. This migration adds three local actions with some associated JS code to run the action (currently it looks like it basically requires JS) * An `install-rust` action papers over the gotchas about installing Rust, allowing Rust installation to be a one-liner in the configuration. * A `binary-compatible-builds` action allows easily configuring the wheels and the binaries to be "more binary compatible" and handles things like compilation flags on OSX and Windows while handling the `centos:6` container on Linux. * The `github-release` action is the logic using the `@actions/github` JS package to orchestrate the custom way we manage rolling releases, ensuring that a new release is made for the master branch under `dev` (deleting the previous tag/release ahead of time) and then also manages tagged releases by uploading them there. I'm hoping that most of the inline actions here will largely go away. For example `install-rust` should be simply `rustup update $toolchain` once various environment issues are fixed on Github Actions runner images. Additionally `github-release` will ideally migrate to something like https://github.com/actions/create-release or similar once it has enough functionality. I'm also hoping that the maintenance in the meantime of these actions is pretty low-cost, but if it becomes an issue we can look into other solutions!
5 years ago
mv bins-$src/{wasmtime,wasm2obj}$exe tmp/$bin_pkgname
chmod +x tmp/$bin_pkgname/{wasmtime,wasm2obj}$exe
mktarball $bin_pkgname
if [ "$exe" = ".exe" ]; then
mv bins-$src/installer.msi dist/$bin_pkgname.msi
fi
# Create tarball of API libraries
api_pkgname=wasmtime-$TAG-$platform-c-api
mkdir tmp/$api_pkgname
mkdir tmp/$api_pkgname/lib
mkdir tmp/$api_pkgname/include
cp LICENSE README.md tmp/$api_pkgname
mv bins-$src/* tmp/$api_pkgname/lib
cp crates/c-api/examples/wasm-c-api/include/wasm.h tmp/$api_pkgname/include
Migrate from Azure Pipelines to Github Actions (#474) This commit migrates wasmtime's CI infrastructure from Azure Pipelines to Github Actions. Using Github Actions has a few benefits over other offerings: * Being natively integrated with Github means that there's no degree of user account configuration or access control management, it's all inherent via already existing Github permissions. * Github Actions gives 20 parallel builders instead of Azure's 10 by default, which is a nice boost to have! Overall I've found Github Actions to feel a bit cleaner than Azure Pipelines as well. Subjectively I've found the configuration to be more readable and more pleasant to work with, although they're both just as "powerful" I think. Additionally Github Actions has been pretty solid in my own personal testing for a number of other projects. The main trickiness with wasmtime's CI is the rolling `dev` release of the master branch as well as binary releases for tags. Github Actions doesn't have quite as much built in functionality as Azure Pipelines, but Github Actions does have a nice feature where you can define the code for an action locally rather than only using built-in actions. This migration adds three local actions with some associated JS code to run the action (currently it looks like it basically requires JS) * An `install-rust` action papers over the gotchas about installing Rust, allowing Rust installation to be a one-liner in the configuration. * A `binary-compatible-builds` action allows easily configuring the wheels and the binaries to be "more binary compatible" and handles things like compilation flags on OSX and Windows while handling the `centos:6` container on Linux. * The `github-release` action is the logic using the `@actions/github` JS package to orchestrate the custom way we manage rolling releases, ensuring that a new release is made for the master branch under `dev` (deleting the previous tag/release ahead of time) and then also manages tagged releases by uploading them there. I'm hoping that most of the inline actions here will largely go away. For example `install-rust` should be simply `rustup update $toolchain` once various environment issues are fixed on Github Actions runner images. Additionally `github-release` will ideally migrate to something like https://github.com/actions/create-release or similar once it has enough functionality. I'm also hoping that the maintenance in the meantime of these actions is pretty low-cost, but if it becomes an issue we can look into other solutions!
5 years ago
mktarball $api_pkgname
# Move wheels to dist folder
mv wheels-$src/* dist