|
|
@ -1,139 +1,81 @@ |
|
|
# Platform Support |
|
|
# Platform Support |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The `wasmtime` project is a configurable and lightweight runtime for WebAssembly |
|
|
This page is intended to give a high-level overview of Wasmtime's platform |
|
|
which has a number of ways it can be configured. Not all features are supported |
|
|
support along with some aspirations of Wasmtime. For more details see the |
|
|
on all platforms, but it is intended that `wasmtime` can run in some capacity on |
|
|
documentation on [tiers of stability](./stability-tiers.md) which has specific |
|
|
almost all platforms! The matrix of what's being tested, what works, and what's |
|
|
information about what's supported in Wasmtime on a per-matrix-combination |
|
|
supported where is evolving over time, and this document hopes to capture a |
|
|
basis. |
|
|
snapshot of what the current state of the world looks like. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wasmtime strives to support hardware that anyone wants to run WebAssembly on. |
|
|
All features of `wasmtime` should work on the following platforms: |
|
|
Maintainers of Wasmtime support a number of "major" platforms themselves but |
|
|
|
|
|
porting work may be required to support platforms that maintainers are not |
|
|
* Linux x86\_64 |
|
|
themselves familiar with. Out-of-the box Wasmtime supports: |
|
|
* Linux aarch64 |
|
|
|
|
|
* macOS x86\_64 |
|
|
* Linux x86\_64, aarch64, s390x, and riscv64 |
|
|
|
|
|
* macOS x86\_64, aarch64 |
|
|
* Windows x86\_64 |
|
|
* Windows x86\_64 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For more detailed information about supported platforms, please check out the |
|
|
Other platforms such as Android, iOS, and the BSD family of OSes are not |
|
|
sections below! |
|
|
built-in yet. PRs for porting are welcome and maintainers are happy to add more |
|
|
|
|
|
entries to the CI matrix for these platforms. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
## JIT compiler support |
|
|
## Compiler Support |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The JIT compiler, backed by Cranelift, supports the x86\_64 and aarch64 |
|
|
Cranelift supports x86\_64, aarch64, s390x, and riscv64. No 32-bit platform is |
|
|
architectures at this time. Support for at least ARM and x86 is planned as well. |
|
|
currently supported. Building a new backend for Cranelift is a relatively large |
|
|
|
|
|
undertaking which maintainers are willing to help with but it's recommended to |
|
|
|
|
|
reach out to Cranelift maintainers first to discuss this. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Usage of the JIT compiler will require a host operating system which supports |
|
|
Winch supports x86\_64. The aarch64 backend is in development. Winch is built on |
|
|
creating executable memory pages on-the-fly. In Rust terms this generally means |
|
|
Cranelift's support for emitting instructions so Winch's possible backend list |
|
|
that `std` needs to be supported on this platform. |
|
|
is currently limited to what Cranelift supports. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Usage of the Cranelift or Winch requires a host operating system which supports |
|
|
|
|
|
creating executable memory pages on-the-fly. Support for statically linking in a |
|
|
|
|
|
single precompiled module is not supported at this time. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Both Cranelift and Winch can be used either in AOT or JIT mode. In AOT mode one |
|
|
|
|
|
process precompiles a module/component and then loads it into another process. |
|
|
|
|
|
In JIT mode this is all done within the same process. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Neither Cranelift nor Winch support tiering at this time in the sense of having |
|
|
|
|
|
a WebAssembly module start from a Winch compilation and automatically switch to |
|
|
|
|
|
a Cranelift compilation. Modules are either entirely compiled with Winch or |
|
|
|
|
|
Cranelift. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
## Interpreter support |
|
|
## Interpreter support |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At this time `wasmtime` does not have a mode in which it simply interprets |
|
|
At this time `wasmtime` does not have a mode in which it simply interprets |
|
|
WebAssembly code. It is planned to add support for an interpreter, however, and |
|
|
WebAssembly code. It is desired to add support for an interpreter, however, and |
|
|
this will have minimal system dependencies. It is planned that the system will |
|
|
this will have minimal system dependencies. It is planned that the system will |
|
|
need to support some form of dynamic memory allocation, but other than that not |
|
|
need to support some form of dynamic memory allocation, but other than that not |
|
|
much else will be needed. |
|
|
much else will be needed. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
## What about `#[no_std]`? |
|
|
## Support for `#![no_std]` |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The `wasmtime` project does not currently use `#[no_std]` for its crates, but |
|
|
The `wasmtime` crate supports being build on no\_std platforms in Rust, but |
|
|
this is not because it won't support it! For information on building Wasmtime |
|
|
only for a subset of its compile-time Cargo features. Currently supported |
|
|
for a custom target see [the minimal build |
|
|
Cargo features are: |
|
|
documentation](./examples-minimal.md). Please [open an |
|
|
|
|
|
issue](https://github.com/bytecodealliance/wasmtime/issues/new) on the |
|
|
* `runtime` |
|
|
`wasmtime` repository to request support for a specific platform. |
|
|
* `gc` |
|
|
|
|
|
* `component-model` |
|
|
This is a common question we are asked, however, so to provide some more context |
|
|
|
|
|
on why Wasmtime is the way it is, here's some responses to frequent points |
|
|
This notably does not include the `default` feature which means that when |
|
|
raised about `#![no_std]`: |
|
|
depending on Wasmtime you'll need to specify `default-features = false`. This |
|
|
|
|
|
also notably does not include Cranelift or Winch at this time meaning that |
|
|
* **What if my platform doesn't have `std`?** - For platforms without support |
|
|
no\_std platforms must be used in AOT mode where the module is precompiled |
|
|
for the Rust standard library the JIT compiler of Wasmtime often won't run on |
|
|
elsewhere. |
|
|
the platform as well. The JIT compiler requires `mmap` (or an equivalent), and |
|
|
|
|
|
presence of `mmap` often implies presence of a libc which means Rust's `std` |
|
|
Wasmtime's support for no\_std requires the embedder to implement the equivalent |
|
|
library works. |
|
|
of a C header file to indicate how to perform basic OS operations such as |
|
|
|
|
|
allocating virtual memory. This API can be found as `wasmtime-platform.h` in |
|
|
Cargo's [`-Z build-std` feature][zbuild-std] feature is also intended to help |
|
|
Wasmtime's release artifacts or at |
|
|
easily build the standard library for all platforms. With this feature you can |
|
|
`examples/min-platform/embedding/wasmtime-platform.h` in the source tree. Note |
|
|
recompile the standard library (using Nightly Rust for now) with a [custom |
|
|
that this API is not guaranteed to be stable at this time, it'll need to be |
|
|
target specification][custom-target] if necessary. Additionally the intention |
|
|
updated when Wasmtime is updated. |
|
|
at this time is to get `std` building for all platforms, regardless of what |
|
|
|
|
|
the platform actually supports. This change is taking time to implement, but |
|
|
Wasmtime's runtime will use the symbols defined in this file meaning that if |
|
|
[rust-lang/rust#74033] is an example of this support growing over time. |
|
|
they're not defined then a link-time error will be generated. Embedders are |
|
|
|
|
|
required to implement these functions in accordance with their documentation to |
|
|
We're also interested in running Wasmtime without a JIT compiler in the |
|
|
enable Wasmtime to run on custom platforms. |
|
|
future, but that is not implemented at this time. Implementing this will |
|
|
|
|
|
require a lot more work than tagging crates `#![no_std]`. The Wasmtime |
|
|
|
|
|
developers are also very interested in supporting as many targets as possible, |
|
|
|
|
|
so if Wasmtime doesn't work on your platform yet we'd love to learn why and |
|
|
|
|
|
what we can do to support that platform, but the conversation here is |
|
|
|
|
|
typically more nuanced than simply making `wasmtime` compile without `std`. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* **Doesn't `#![no_std]` have smaller binary sizes?** - There's a lot of factors |
|
|
|
|
|
that affect binary size in Rust. Compilation options are a huge one but beyond |
|
|
|
|
|
that idioms and libraries linked matter quite a lot as well. Code is not |
|
|
|
|
|
inherently large when using `std` instead of `core`, it's just that often code |
|
|
|
|
|
using `std` has more dependencies (like `std::thread`) which requires code to |
|
|
|
|
|
bind. Code size improvements can be made to code using `std` and `core` |
|
|
|
|
|
equally, and switching to `#![no_std]` is not a silver bullet for compile |
|
|
|
|
|
sizes. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* **The patch to switch to `#![no_std]` is small, why not accept it?** - PRs to |
|
|
|
|
|
switch to `#![no_std]` are often relatively small or don't impact too many |
|
|
|
|
|
parts of the system. There's a lot more to developing a `#![no_std]` |
|
|
|
|
|
WebAssembly runtime than switching a few crates, however. Maintaining a |
|
|
|
|
|
`#![no_std]` library over time has a number of costs associated with it: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Rust has no stable way to diagnose `no_std` errors in an otherwise `std` |
|
|
|
|
|
build, which means that to support this feature it must be tested on CI with |
|
|
|
|
|
a `no_std` target. This is costly in terms of CI time, CI maintenance, and |
|
|
|
|
|
developers having to do extra builds to avoid CI errors. Note that this |
|
|
|
|
|
isn't *more* costly than any other platform supported by Wasmtime, but it's |
|
|
|
|
|
a cost nonetheless. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Idioms in `#![no_std]` are quite different than normal Rust code. You'll |
|
|
|
|
|
import from different crates (`core` instead of `std`) and data structures |
|
|
|
|
|
have to all be manually imported from `alloc`. These idioms are difficult to |
|
|
|
|
|
learn for newcomers to the project and are not well documented in the |
|
|
|
|
|
ecosystem. This cost of development and maintenance is not unique to |
|
|
|
|
|
Wasmtime but in general affects the `#![no_std]` ecosystem at large, |
|
|
|
|
|
unfortunately. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Currently Wasmtime does not have a target use case which requires |
|
|
|
|
|
`#![no_std]` support, so it's hard to justify these costs of development. |
|
|
|
|
|
We're very interested in supporting as many use cases and targets as |
|
|
|
|
|
possible, but the decision to support a target needs to take into account |
|
|
|
|
|
the costs associated so we can plan accordingly. Effectively we need to have |
|
|
|
|
|
a goal in mind instead of taking on the costs of `#![no_std]` blindly. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* At this time it's not clear whether `#![no_std]` will be needed long-term, |
|
|
|
|
|
so eating short-term costs may not pay off in the long run. Features like |
|
|
|
|
|
Cargo's [`-Z build-std`][zbuild-std] may mean that `#![no_std]` is less and |
|
|
|
|
|
less necessary over time. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* **How can Wasmtime support `#![no_std]` if it uses X?** - Wasmtime as-is today |
|
|
|
|
|
is not suitable for many `#![no_std]` contexts. For example it might use |
|
|
|
|
|
`mmap` for allocating JIT code memory, leverage threads for caching, or use |
|
|
|
|
|
thread locals when calling into JIT code. These features are difficult to |
|
|
|
|
|
support in their full fidelity on all platforms, but the Wasmtime developers |
|
|
|
|
|
are very much aware of this! Wasmtime is intended to be configurable where |
|
|
|
|
|
many of these features are compile-time or runtime options. For example caches |
|
|
|
|
|
can be disabled, JITs can be removed and replaced with interpreters, or users |
|
|
|
|
|
could provide a callback to allocate memory instead of using the OS. |
|
|
|
|
|
This is sort of a long-winded way of saying that Wasmtime on the surface may |
|
|
|
|
|
today look like it won't support `#![no_std]`, but this is almost always |
|
|
|
|
|
simply a matter of time and development priorities rather than a fundamental |
|
|
|
|
|
reason why Wasmtime *couldn't* support `#![no_std]`. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note that at this time these guidelines apply not only to Wasmtime but also to |
|
|
|
|
|
some of its dependencies developed by the Bytecode Alliance such as the |
|
|
|
|
|
[wasm-tools repository](https://github.com/bytecodealliance/wasm-tools). These |
|
|
|
|
|
projects don't have the same runtime requirements as Wasmtime (e.g. `wasmparser` |
|
|
|
|
|
doesn't need `mmap`), but we're following the same guidelines above at this |
|
|
|
|
|
time. Patches to add `#![no_std]`, while possibly small, incur many of the same |
|
|
|
|
|
costs and also have an unclear longevity as features like [`-Z |
|
|
|
|
|
build-std`][zbuild-std] evolve. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[zbuild-std]: https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/cargo/reference/unstable.html#build-std |
|
|
|
|
|
[custom-target]: https://doc.rust-lang.org/rustc/targets/custom.html |
|
|
|
|
|
[rust-lang/rust#74033]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/74033 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Alex Crichton
6 months ago
GitHub