Both duk_hthread and duk_context typedefs resolve to struct duk_hthread
internally. In external API duk_context resolves to struct duk_hthread
which is intentionally left undefined as the struct itself is not
dereferenced. Change internal code to use duk_hthread exclusively which
removes unnecessary and awkward thr <-> ctx casts from internals.
The basic guidelines are:
* Public API uses duk_context in prototype declarations. The intent is to
hide the internal type, and there's already a wide dependency on the
type name.
* All internal code, both declarations and definitions, use duk_hthread
exclusively. This is done even for API functions, i.e. an API function
declared as "void duk_foo(duk_context *ctx);" is then defined as
"void duk_foo(duk_hthread *thr);".
* Change plain buffers to inherit from Uint8Array. This affects a lot of
small things like Object.prototype.toString() output, enumeration of plain
buffers, etc. It also changes JSON serialization for plain buffers because
the index properties are enumerable as with Uint8Array instances.
* Disable JSON stringify fastpath for plain buffers for now so that the
virtual index properties get serialized correctly.
* Remove ArrayBuffer non-standard virtual properties.
* Remove DataView non-standard virtual properties.
* Move .byteLength, .byteOffset, .BYTES_PER_ELEMENT, and .buffer into
inherited getters as required in ES6. However, the .length property
remains a virtual own property for now (it too is an inherited getter
in ES6).
* Move ArrayBuffer.allocPlain() and ArrayBuffer.plainOf() to
Uint8Array.allocPlain() and Uint8Array.plainOf() to match the
semantics change for plain buffers.
* Fix Node.js buffer .slice() behavior, the returned Node.js buffer
would have ArrayBuffer.isView == 0 which doesn't match the revised
Node.js behavior (Buffers being Uint8Array instances)
* Reject ArrayBuffers with a view offset/length in Node.js Buffer .slice()
rather than accept such ArrayBuffers without actually respecting the
view offset/length.
* Allow a plain buffer or a lightfunc as a constructor "replacement object"
return value.
* Plain buffers still inherit from ArrayBuffer.prototype.
* Plain buffers won't object coerce, so Object(plainBuffer) fails.
* All buffer object related methods throw an error; their function bodies
are essentially empty. Note that this includes bindings such as
String.fromBuffer(), ArrayBuffer.allocPlain(), ArrayBuffer.plainOf(),
and so on. In essence, you can index plain buffers in Ecmascript but
the buffer values must be created via the C API.
* Duktape custom bindings like Duktape.dec('hex', 'deadbeef') still work
and produce plain buffers.
Change handling of plain buffers so that they behave like ArrayBuffer
instances to Ecmascript code, with limitations such as not being
extensible and all properties being virtualized. This simplifies
Ecmascript code as plain buffers are just lightweight ArrayBuffers
(similarly to how lightfuncs appear as function objects). There are
a lot of small changes in how the built-in objects and methods, and
the C API deals with plain buffer values.
Also make a few small changes to plain pointer and lightfunc handling
to improve consistency with how plain buffers are now handled.
Improve readability by doing the following renames:
* duk_hcompiledfunction -> duk_hcompfunc
* duk_hnativefunction -> duk_hnatfunc
* duk_hbufferobject -> duk_hbufobj
Corresponding renames for all caps defines.
Sami Vaarala