/* * RegExp.prototype.compile() polyfill, described in E6 Annex B: * * http://www.ecma-international.org/ecma-262/6.0/index.html#sec-regexp.prototype.compile * * See also: * * http://mozilla.6506.n7.nabble.com/RegExp-prototype-compile-and-RegExp-instance-properties-td270408.html * * This polyfill cannot be implemented in terms of standard E5 because it * needs to reinitialize the internal state of a RegExp instance. To do * that, we access the Duktape internal properties directly, which is * quite fragile. * * Avoid storing a public copy of Duktape or some internal property name in * the global object. This could subvert user sandboxing. */ (function () { var propBytecode = Duktape.dec('hex', 'ff62797465636f6465'); // \xFFbytecode if (typeof RegExp.prototype.compile !== 'undefined') { return; } Object.defineProperty(RegExp.prototype, 'compile', { value: function (pattern, flags) { var newBytecode, tmpRegexp; if (typeof this !== 'object' || !(propBytecode in this)) { throw new TypeError('invalid this binding'); } // FIXME: property attributes prevent this approach from working // right now. The properties we'd need to modify are non-writable // and non-configurable: // // \xffBytecode // source // global // ignoreCase // multiline // // The property attributes can be relaxed, or the properties // can be made accessors backing to the regexp bytecode. if (typeof pattern === 'object' && (propBytecode in pattern)) { this[propBytecode] = pattern[propBytecode]; } else { tmpRegexp = new RegExp(pattern, flags); this[propBytecode] = tmpRegexp[propBytecode]; } //this.source //this.global //this.ignoreCase //this.multiline this.lastIndex = 0; return this; }, writable: true, enumerable: false, configurable: true }); throw new Error('RegExp.prototype.compile() polyfill incomplete'); })();