mirror of https://github.com/svaarala/duktape.git
You can not select more than 25 topics
Topics must start with a letter or number, can include dashes ('-') and can be up to 35 characters long.
448 lines
15 KiB
448 lines
15 KiB
===========================
|
|
Status of test262 testcases
|
|
===========================
|
|
|
|
Overview
|
|
========
|
|
|
|
Test262 provides testcases for various Ecmascript features, unfortunately
|
|
also including features and behavior beyond E5/E5.1 standard (for instance
|
|
the tests refer to the ``Intl`` module).
|
|
|
|
This document summarizes the currently failing testcases and why they fail.
|
|
The test run was executed against::
|
|
|
|
d83445976cb8ca6169a2ac3ac76dd8d8 d067d2f0ca30.tar.bz2
|
|
|
|
A list of known bugs is documented in::
|
|
|
|
test262-known-issues.json
|
|
|
|
This list contains testcases which are known and accepted to fail for now:
|
|
test case might be buggy or expect non-standard behavior, or there might be
|
|
a Duktape limitation (a long term bug) which is accepted for now.
|
|
|
|
Summary of failure reasons
|
|
==========================
|
|
|
|
In addition to unfixed bugs, the following reasons cause some test262 test
|
|
cases to fail:
|
|
|
|
* Anything under ``intl402`` fails as Duktape does not provide the ``Intl``
|
|
object which is not part of E5/E5.1.
|
|
|
|
* Duktape does not provice ``RegExp.prototype.compile`` which is not part
|
|
of E5/E5.1.
|
|
|
|
* Duktape follows the E5.1 regexp syntax strictly (except for allowing the
|
|
``\$`` identity escape). Some things that fail in test cases:
|
|
|
|
- invalid backreferences (e.g. ``/\1/``)
|
|
- invalid identity escapes (e.g. ``/\a/``)
|
|
- invalid decimal escapes in character classes (e.g. ``[\12-\14]``)
|
|
- special characters appearing literally without escape (e.g. ``]``)
|
|
|
|
* Duktape does not allow function declaration outside Program or FunctionBody
|
|
top level. Such statements are not part of E5/E5.1. (They are fairly common
|
|
so perhaps this support will be added later.)
|
|
|
|
* Duktape does not support specific locales, which affect e.g. case conversion
|
|
and locale sensitive string comparison. ``String.prototype.localeCompare()``
|
|
is the same as an ordinary compare which breaks e.g.
|
|
ch15/15.5/15.5.4/15.5.4.9/15.5.4.9_CE: ``"\u006f\u0308"`` is considered different
|
|
from ``"\u00f6"`` (precomposed).
|
|
|
|
* Labels defined for statements other than iteration statements don't work
|
|
fully at the moment. This causes an ``INVALID opcode`` error.
|
|
|
|
* Duktape allows octal syntax. There is a test case which requires that
|
|
``parseInt()`` should not accept octal syntax; this test case fails.
|
|
|
|
* Duktape has a conservative limit on the C recursion required to execute
|
|
regexps. This limit can cause several test cases to fail.
|
|
|
|
* There seem to be several bugs in the Date testcases of test262 (see
|
|
detailed error description).
|
|
|
|
Notes on individual errors
|
|
==========================
|
|
|
|
Some notes on individual errors. This list is not exhaustive.
|
|
|
|
annexB/B.RegExp.prototype.compile
|
|
---------------------------------
|
|
|
|
Same failure in strict and non-strict modes::
|
|
|
|
=== annexB/B.RegExp.prototype.compile failed in non-strict mode ===
|
|
--- errors ---
|
|
TypeError: invalid base reference for property read
|
|
duk_hobject_props.c:1694
|
|
testcase /tmp/test262-T1pW1o.js:2217
|
|
runTestCase /tmp/test262-T1pW1o.js:901
|
|
global /tmp/test262-T1pW1o.js:2059 preventsyield
|
|
===
|
|
|
|
The E5/E5.1 specification does not include a ``RegExp.prototype.compile()``,
|
|
so this testcase should actually fail.
|
|
|
|
ch07/7.8/7.8.5/S7.8.5_A1.4_T1
|
|
-----------------------------
|
|
|
|
Same failure in strict and non-strict modes::
|
|
|
|
=== ch07/7.8/7.8.5/S7.8.5_A1.4_T1 failed in non-strict mode ===
|
|
--- errors ---
|
|
SyntaxError: invalid backreference(s) (line 2216)
|
|
duk_regexp_compiler.c:889
|
|
===
|
|
|
|
The test case uses a RegExp of the form ``/\1/``. Based on E5.1 Section
|
|
15.10.2.9 this form is invalid (V8 and Rhino allow these broken regexps
|
|
though):
|
|
|
|
NOTE
|
|
An escape sequence of the form \ followed by a nonzero decimal number n
|
|
matches the result of the nth set of capturing parentheses (see 15.10.2.11).
|
|
It is an error if the regular expression has fewer than n capturing parentheses.
|
|
If the regular expression has n or more capturing parentheses but the nth one
|
|
is undefined because it has not captured anything, then the backreference
|
|
always succeeds.
|
|
|
|
If you comment out the offending regexp, the test case then fails with the
|
|
following in response to an invalid RegExp ``/\a/`` (again, accepted by V8
|
|
and Rhino)::
|
|
|
|
SyntaxError: invalid regexp escape (line 2221)
|
|
duk_lexer.c:1551
|
|
|
|
This RegExp is invalid because "a" is not allowed as an identity escape.
|
|
E5.1 Section 15.10.1::
|
|
|
|
IdentityEscape ::
|
|
SourceCharacter but not IdentifierPart
|
|
<ZWJ>
|
|
<ZWNJ>
|
|
|
|
Because "a" belongs to IdentifierPart, it is an invalid identity escape.
|
|
Because it doesn't match any other alternatives for an AtomEscape either,
|
|
it should cause a SyntaxError.
|
|
|
|
Commenting out the ``/\a/`` regexp, the test case finishes.
|
|
|
|
This test case is a bit dubious anyway, because it asserts that a RegExp
|
|
``source`` property should have a specific form. E5.1 Section 15.10.4.1:
|
|
|
|
Let S be a String in the form of a Pattern equivalent to P, in which
|
|
certain characters are escaped as described below. S may or may not be
|
|
identical to P or pattern; however, the internal procedure that would
|
|
result from evaluating S as a Pattern must behave identically to the
|
|
internal procedure given by the constructed object's [[Match]] internal
|
|
property.
|
|
|
|
So, for instance, it would be compliant to have a regexp ``/x/`` with
|
|
a ``source`` property of either ``x`` or ``\u0078`` or even ``(?:\u0078){1}``.
|
|
|
|
ch07/7.8/7.8.5/S7.8.5_A1.4_T2
|
|
-----------------------------
|
|
|
|
Same failure in strict and non-strict modes::
|
|
|
|
=== ch07/7.8/7.8.5/S7.8.5_A1.4_T2 failed in non-strict mode ===
|
|
--- errors ---
|
|
Test262 Error: #0031
|
|
===
|
|
|
|
This is caused by trying to eval the regexp ``/\1/``, which contains a
|
|
SyntaxError (invalid back-reference, see above).
|
|
|
|
ch10/10.4/10.4.2/10.4.2-1-2
|
|
---------------------------
|
|
|
|
Same failure in strict and non-strict modes::
|
|
|
|
=== ch10/10.4/10.4.2/10.4.2-1-2 failed in non-strict mode ===
|
|
--- errors ---
|
|
SyntaxError: function declaration not allowed outside of top level (line 2221)
|
|
duk_js_compiler.c:5289
|
|
===
|
|
|
|
Function declarations are not allowed in E5.1 outside the top level
|
|
of a Program or a FunctionBody. Many implementations accept such
|
|
declarations, with various interpretations. Some interpretation will
|
|
probably be added to Duktape too, but this hasn't yet been done.
|
|
|
|
ch12/12.6/12.6.1/S12.6.1_A4_T5
|
|
------------------------------
|
|
|
|
::
|
|
|
|
=== ch12/12.6/12.6.1/S12.6.1_A4_T5 failed in non-strict mode ===
|
|
--- errors ---
|
|
Error: INVALID opcode (0)
|
|
duk_js_executor.c:3346
|
|
global /tmp/test262-VkMHq3.js:2217 preventsyield
|
|
===
|
|
|
|
Duktape bug.
|
|
|
|
ch12/12.6/12.6.2/S12.6.2_A4_T5
|
|
------------------------------
|
|
|
|
::
|
|
|
|
=== ch12/12.6/12.6.2/S12.6.2_A4_T5 failed in non-strict mode ===
|
|
--- errors ---
|
|
Error: INVALID opcode (0)
|
|
duk_js_executor.c:3346
|
|
global /tmp/test262-npZKm6.js:2217 preventsyield
|
|
===
|
|
|
|
Duktape bug.
|
|
|
|
ch15/15.1/15.1.2/15.1.2.2/S15.1.2.2_A5.1_T1
|
|
-------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
::
|
|
|
|
=== ch15/15.1/15.1.2/15.1.2.2/S15.1.2.2_A5.1_T1 failed in non-strict mode ===
|
|
--- errors ---
|
|
Test262 Error: parseInt should no longer accept octal
|
|
===
|
|
|
|
Duktape ``parseInt()`` accepts octal::
|
|
|
|
duk> parseInt('077')
|
|
= 63
|
|
|
|
This matches Rhino and V8 behavior.
|
|
|
|
ch15/15.10/15.10.2/S15.10.2_A1_T1
|
|
---------------------------------
|
|
|
|
::
|
|
|
|
=== ch15/15.10/15.10.2/S15.10.2_A1_T1 failed in non-strict mode ===
|
|
--- errors ---
|
|
Test262 Error: #4: XML Shallow Parsing with Regular Expression: [^]]*]([^]]+])*]+
|
|
===
|
|
|
|
First error happens with index 4 into the regexp set, the precise error is::
|
|
|
|
SyntaxError: invalid regexp character
|
|
duk_lexer.c:1598
|
|
RegExp (null) native strict construct preventsyield
|
|
global /tmp/foo.js:2285 preventsyield
|
|
|
|
It seems that the RegExp contains a literal "]" character (which is not paired
|
|
with a "[" to begin a character class), which is a SyntaxError.
|
|
|
|
ch15/15.10/15.10.2/15.10.2.10/S15.10.2.10_A2.1_T3
|
|
-------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
::
|
|
|
|
=== ch15/15.10/15.10.2/15.10.2.10/S15.10.2.10_A2.1_T3 failed in non-strict mode ===
|
|
--- errors ---
|
|
SyntaxError: invalid regexp control escape
|
|
duk_lexer.c:1492
|
|
RegExp (null) native strict construct preventsyield
|
|
global /tmp/test262-heB_na.js:2219 preventsyield
|
|
===
|
|
|
|
This test case does e.g.::
|
|
|
|
for (alpha = 0x0410; alpha <= 0x042F; alpha++) {
|
|
str = String.fromCharCode(alpha % 32);
|
|
arr = (new RegExp("\\c" + String.fromCharCode(alpha))).exec(str);
|
|
// ...
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
The syntax error comes from parsing a RegExp ``\cX`` where ``X`` is a non-ASCII
|
|
character (e.g. U+0410 and onwards). This is clearly not allowed by the RegExp
|
|
syntax in E5.1 Section 15.10.1 (see CharacterEscape and ControlLetter productions).
|
|
|
|
ch15/15.10/15.10.2/15.10.2.10/S15.10.2.10_A5.1_T1
|
|
-------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
::
|
|
|
|
=== ch15/15.10/15.10.2/15.10.2.10/S15.10.2.10_A5.1_T1 failed in non-strict mode ===
|
|
--- errors ---
|
|
SyntaxError: decode error
|
|
duk_lexer.c:404
|
|
RegExp (null) native strict construct preventsyield
|
|
global /tmp/test262-4ZVGcj.js:2220 preventsyield
|
|
===
|
|
|
|
There seems to be a test case error::
|
|
|
|
var non_ident = "~`!@#$%^&*()-+={[}]|\\:;'<,>./?" + '"';
|
|
var k = -1;
|
|
do {
|
|
k++;
|
|
print("\\" + non_ident[k], "g")
|
|
arr = new RegExp("\\" + non_ident[k], "g").exec(non_ident);
|
|
} while ((arr !== null) && (arr[0] === non_ident[k]))
|
|
|
|
The loop works correctly until ``k`` points outside the ``non_ident``
|
|
array. The loop then tries to create a regexp with::
|
|
|
|
new RegExp("\\" + undefined, "g");
|
|
|
|
The RegExp input will be ``\undefined`` which contains an invalid Unicode
|
|
escape, causing the SyntaxError from Duktape. There is no valid way of
|
|
parsing ``\u`` in a regexp. Note that ``\u`` is not allowed as an identity
|
|
escape (IdentityEscape explicitly rejects IdentifierPart characters), and
|
|
there are no other rules allowing it either.
|
|
|
|
ch15/15.10/15.10.2/15.10.2.13/S15.10.2.13_A1_T16
|
|
------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
::
|
|
|
|
=== ch15/15.10/15.10.2/15.10.2.13/S15.10.2.13_A1_T16 failed in non-strict mode ===
|
|
--- errors ---
|
|
SyntaxError: invalid decimal escape (line 2215)
|
|
duk_lexer.c:1786
|
|
===
|
|
|
|
The SyntaxError is caused by::
|
|
|
|
__executed = /[\d][\12-\14]{1,}[^\d]/.exec("line1\n\n\n\n\nline2");
|
|
|
|
Here, a ``\12`` DecimalEscape occurs inside a character class. The DecimalEscape
|
|
evaluates to the integer 12 (see E5.1 Section 15.10.2.11, step 3). Then, the
|
|
ClassEscape throws a SyntaxError; see E5.1 Section 15.10.2.19 steps 1-2::
|
|
|
|
1. Evaluate DecimalEscape to obtain an EscapeValue E.
|
|
|
|
2. If E is not a character then throw a SyntaxError exception.
|
|
|
|
ch15/15.10/15.10.2/15.10.2.3/S15.10.2.3_A1_T8
|
|
---------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
::
|
|
|
|
=== ch15/15.10/15.10.2/15.10.2.3/S15.10.2.3_A1_T8 failed in non-strict mode ===
|
|
--- errors ---
|
|
RangeError: regexp executor recursion limit
|
|
duk_regexp_executor.c:145
|
|
exec (null) native strict preventsyield
|
|
global /tmp/test262-FESnbK.js:2215 preventsyield
|
|
===
|
|
|
|
Caused by::
|
|
|
|
__executed = /(?:ab|cd)+|ef/.exec("aekfcd");
|
|
|
|
This should be a pretty simple case, looks like some Duktape bug.
|
|
|
|
ch15/15.10/15.10.2/15.10.2.3/S15.10.2.3_A1_T9
|
|
---------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
::
|
|
|
|
=== ch15/15.10/15.10.2/15.10.2.3/S15.10.2.3_A1_T9 failed in non-strict mode ===
|
|
--- errors ---
|
|
RangeError: regexp executor recursion limit
|
|
duk_regexp_executor.c:145
|
|
exec (null) native strict preventsyield
|
|
global /tmp/test262-Nghlk8.js:2215 preventsyield
|
|
===
|
|
|
|
Caused by::
|
|
|
|
__executed = /(?:ab|cd)+|ef/i.exec("AEKFCDab");
|
|
|
|
This should be a pretty simple case, looks like some Duktape bug.
|
|
|
|
ch15/15.10/15.10.2/15.10.2.6/S15.10.2.6_A4_T7
|
|
---------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
A SyntaxError occurs with the RegExp::
|
|
|
|
__executed = /\B\[^z]{4}\B/.test("devil arise\tforzzx\nevils");
|
|
|
|
The ``\[`` is accepted as an identity escape, which then leads to SyntaxError
|
|
because none of ``^``, ``]``, ``{``, or ``}`` are accepted unescaped by E5.1
|
|
(see PatternCharacter production).
|
|
|
|
The point of the testcase is probably to test that ``\[`` is not evaluated as
|
|
``[``. If the escape is removed, the RegExp matches with the result ``"il a"``
|
|
with both Duktape and Rhino. This causes a test case failure, the test case
|
|
is expected not to match.
|
|
|
|
If the invalid characters are escaped, the test case passes::
|
|
|
|
__executed = /\B\[\^z\]\{4\}\B/.test("devil arise\tforzzx\nevils");
|
|
|
|
ch15/15.5/15.5.4/15.5.4.7/S15.5.4.7_A1_T11
|
|
------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
::
|
|
|
|
=== ch15/15.5/15.5.4/15.5.4.7/S15.5.4.7_A1_T11 failed in non-strict mode ===
|
|
--- errors ---
|
|
Test262 Error: #1: __instance = new Date(0); __instance.indexOf = String.prototype.indexOf; (__instance.getTimezoneOffset()>0 ? __instance.indexOf('31') : __instance.indexOf('01')) === 8. Actual: 5
|
|
===
|
|
|
|
The test case relies on the ``toString()`` coercion of a Date instance.
|
|
For instance, Rhino formats the ``__instance`` as::
|
|
|
|
Thu Jan 01 1970 02:00:00 GMT+0200 (EET)
|
|
|
|
The index for "01" here is 8. Note that this format is locale and platform
|
|
specific so the test case is not reliable. Duktape uses ISO 8601 also for
|
|
``toString()``::
|
|
|
|
1970-01-01 02:00:00.000+02:00
|
|
|
|
Here the index for "01" is 5, which causes a test case failure.
|
|
|
|
ch15/15.5/15.5.4/15.5.4.9/15.5.4.9_CE
|
|
-------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
::
|
|
|
|
=== ch15/15.5/15.5.4/15.5.4.9/15.5.4.9_CE failed in non-strict mode ===
|
|
--- errors ---
|
|
Test262 Error: String.prototype.localeCompare considers ö (\u006f\u0308) ≠ ö (\u00f6).
|
|
===
|
|
|
|
Duktape ``localeCompare()`` does not perform an actual Unicode string
|
|
comparison, i.e. something which would know about composing characters
|
|
and such.
|
|
|
|
ch15/15.9/15.9.3/S15.9.3.1_A5_{T1,T2,T3,T4,T5,T6}
|
|
-------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
These tests fail with::
|
|
|
|
=== ch15/15.9/15.9.3/S15.9.3.1_A5_T1 failed in non-strict mode ===
|
|
--- errors ---
|
|
Test262 Error: #1: Incorrect value of Date
|
|
===
|
|
|
|
There seem to be incorrect comparison values for the Dates. For example,
|
|
in T6::
|
|
|
|
if (-2208960000001 !== new Date(1899, 11, 31, 23, 59, 59, 999).valueOf()) {
|
|
$FAIL("#1: Incorrect value of Date");
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
The date expression yields ``-2208996000001`` in both Rhino and V8, so the
|
|
test case is probably incorrect (there is a missing ``9`` digit and extra
|
|
``0`` digit)). There are similar issues in test 2 and 3 too. Test 4 also
|
|
seems incorrect::
|
|
|
|
if (28799999 !== new Date(1969, 11, 31, 23, 59, 59, 999).valueOf()) {
|
|
$FAIL("#4: Incorrect value of Date");
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
Because Jan 1, 1970 is the "zero point", all dates before that will have
|
|
negative time values, so the test case is obviously incorrect. Rhino and
|
|
V8 agree, returning ``-7200001`` for the expression.
|
|
|
|
All of these test cases also fail with Rhino, and the errors seem to be in
|
|
the comparison values of the test case.
|
|
|