You can not select more than 25 topics Topics must start with a letter or number, can include dashes ('-') and can be up to 35 characters long.
 
 
 
 
 
 

193 lines
6.1 KiB

--- !ditz.rubyforge.org,2008-03-06/issue
title: DUK_TVAL_SET_TVAL corruption in FreeBSD + clang
desc: |-
To reproduce:
* Compile in FreeBSD with clang 3.3:
$ clang -v
FreeBSD clang version 3.3 (tags/RELEASE_33/final 183502) 20130610
Target: x86_64-unknown-freebsd10.0
Thread model: posix
* Additional options: -m32, DUK_PROFILE=101
* Hand tune duk_features.h to enable all log levels
* The problem persists even when -fstrict-aliasing is NOT given, but
disappears if -Os is changed to -O0.
Incorrect behavior happens in multiple places (not sure if this is a clang/llvm
bug or incorrect assumptions in Duktape aliasing related code).
In duk_push_tval(), after DUK_TVAL_SET_TVAL(tv_slot, tv) has been called, the
memory dump of the two regions are (first byte is from 'tv', second is from
'tv_slot')::
60 60
32 32
81 81
28 28
00 00
00 00
f5 fd <==
ff ff
As can be seen, the second to last byte has been changed from F5 to FD, which
causes all sorts of problems. One possible culprit may be the DUK_TVAL_SET_TVAL()
macro itself, which simply uses *(dst) = *(src) for a duk_double_union - perhaps
this is non-portable. The problem persist even when replaced by a memmove() or
by (dst)->d = (src)->d.
Copying the values byte by byte using the 'uc' part of the union fixes this
particular problem::
#define DUK_TVAL_SET_TVAL(v,x) do { \
volatile int _i; \
for (_i = 0; _i < sizeof(duk_tval); _i++) { \
((unsigned char *) (v))[_i] = ((unsigned char *) (x))[_i]; \
} \
} while (0)
Note that if you remove "volatile", the fix works in most call sites but not
all! This suggests clang/llvm converts the hand-coded byte copy to some
intrinsic which fails to honor the aliasing rules for char pointers.
Another problem seems to happen in duk_hobject_props.c:realloc_props, at the
line:
new_e_pv[new_e_used] = DUK_HOBJECT_E_GET_VALUE(obj, i);
The line copies a duk_propvalue to another using a plain assignment. Debug
printing the results shows that the values get corrupted in the copy the same
way as in DUK_TVAL_SET_TVAL. Some values copy OK (first is source, second is
target):
00 00
00 00
00 00
00 00
00 00
00 00
f8 f8
7f 7f
00 00
00 00
00 00
00 00
00 00
00 00
f0 f0
7f 7f
while others get corrupted again at their 7th byte (little endian memory layout).
In more concrete terms, 0x08 gets OR'd to the 7th byte. Considering the double
as a 64-bit big endian value, 0x0008'0000'0000'0000 gets OR'd to the value:
2c 2c
cb cb
ff ff
ff ff
00 00
00 00
f1 f9 <==
ff ff
10 10
49 49
81 81
28 28
00 00
00 00
f6 fe <==
ff ff
The bit in question is the highest bit of the fractional part. This can be
similarly fixed by writing a manual byte-by-byte copy, again with a volatile
loop counter.
type: :bugfix
component: duk
release: v0.10
reporter: sva <sami.vaarala@iki.fi>
status: :unstarted
disposition:
creation_time: 2013-12-10 01:28:45.479389 Z
references: []
id: 4df1a3df6fcfc88b7515221dd083243df8747cb0
log_events:
- - 2013-12-10 01:28:45.647113 Z
- sva <sami.vaarala@iki.fi>
- created
- ""
- - 2013-12-10 01:30:44.318909 Z
- sva <sami.vaarala@iki.fi>
- commented
- |-
Below is a diff of the two fixes mentioned in the description, applied to
the all-in-one source, which together fix the crashes in FreeBSD + clang
3.3. The diff is not directly applicable because it is a bit hacky, but
illustrates the idea of the fix.
Removing the 'volatile' for either of the loop variables breaks the result.
$ diff -u duktape-orig.c duktape-fixed.c
--- duktape-orig.c 2013-12-10 04:28:08.000000000 +0200
+++ duktape-fixed.c 2013-12-10 04:28:15.000000000 +0200
@@ -5832,7 +5832,12 @@
#define DUK_TVAL_SET_BUFFER(v,h) DUK__TVAL_SET_TAGGEDPOINTER((v),(h),DUK_TAG_BUFFER)
#define DUK_TVAL_SET_POINTER(v,p) DUK__TVAL_SET_TAGGEDPOINTER((v),(p),DUK_TAG_POINTER)
-#define DUK_TVAL_SET_TVAL(v,x) do { *(v) = *(x); } while (0)
+#define DUK_TVAL_SET_TVAL(v,x) do { \
+ volatile int _i; \
+ for (_i = 0; _i < 8; _i++) { \
+ ((unsigned char *) (v))[_i] = ((unsigned char *) (x))[_i]; \
+ } \
+} while(0)
/* getters */
#define DUK_TVAL_GET_BOOLEAN(v) ((int) (v)->us[DUK_DBL_IDX_US1])
@@ -31536,7 +31541,15 @@
new_e_pv != NULL && new_e_f != NULL);
new_e_k[new_e_used] = key;
+#if 0
new_e_pv[new_e_used] = DUK_HOBJECT_E_GET_VALUE(obj, i);
+#endif
+ {
+ unsigned char *p_dst = (unsigned char *) &new_e_pv[new_e_used];
+ unsigned char *p_src = (unsigned char *) DUK_HOBJECT_E_GET_VALUE_PTR(obj, i);
+ volatile int _i;
+ for (_i = 0; _i < 8; _i++) { p_dst[_i] = p_src[_i]; }
+ }
new_e_f[new_e_used] = DUK_HOBJECT_E_GET_FLAGS(obj, i);
new_e_used++;
}
- - 2013-12-10 10:00:44.425108 Z
- sva <sami.vaarala@iki.fi>
- commented
- "See: misc/clang_aliasing.c"
- - 2013-12-10 18:19:25.100543 Z
- sva <sami.vaarala@iki.fi>
- commented
- |-
The root cause is the fact the clang ends up using a floating point load and
store to do the structured union assignment. A load+store sequence on X86
may convert a signaling NaN into a quiet NaN, which happens by setting the
highest bit of the mantissa. See, for instance:
http://caml.inria.fr/mantis/view.php?id=5038
This may be impossible to catch at compile time, so perhaps add a few self
tests and/or add an assert to DUK_TVAL_SET_TVAL. There is no telling what
other code might be affected though.
- - 2013-12-10 21:35:38.936057 Z
- sva <sami.vaarala@iki.fi>
- assigned to release v0.9 from v0.8
- ""
- - 2014-01-12 14:03:11.829583 Z
- sva <sami.vaarala@iki.fi>
- assigned to release v0.10 from v0.9
- ""