@ -126,6 +126,10 @@ If you intend to display large lists of items (say, 1000+) it can be beneficial
You can alter the look of the interface to some degree: changing colors, sizes, padding, rounding, fonts. However, as ImGui is designed and optimised to create debug tools, the amount of skinning you can apply is limited. There is only so much you can stray away from the default look and feel of the interface.
This is [LumixEngine](https://github.com/nem0/LumixEngine]) with a minor skinning hack + a docking/tabs extension (both of which you can find in the Issues section and will eventually be merged).
[](https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/8225057/13044612/59f07aec-d3cf-11e5-8ccb-39adf2e13e69.png)
<b>Why using C++ (as opposed to C)?</b>
ImGui takes advantage of a few C++ features for convenience but nothing anywhere Boost-insanity/quagmire. In particular, function overloading and default parameters are used to make the API easier to use and code more terse. Doing so I believe the API is sitting on a sweet spot and giving up on those features would make the API more cumbersome. Other features such as namespace, constructors and templates (in the case of the ImVector<> class) are also relied on as a convenience but could be removed.
omar
9 years ago