remove excessive and buggy patterns from JIT_OP_EXPAND_INT and

JIT_OP_EXPAND_UINT rules

ChangeLog

@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+2006-10-23  Aleksey Demakov  <ademakov@gmail.com>
+
+	* jit/jit-rules-x86.ins: JIT_OP_EXPAND_INT and JIT_OP_EXPAND_UINT
+	rules were broken for local byte or short values. Fixed by removing
+	the local pattern altogether as the reg pattern produces the same
+	code but without the bug.
+
 2006-10-18  Aleksey Demakov  <ademakov@gmail.com>
 
 	* jit/jit-reg-alloc.c (clobbers_register, bind_value): enable

jit/jit-rules-x86.ins

@@ -118,16 +118,6 @@ JIT_OP_LOW_WORD:
 	}
 	
 JIT_OP_EXPAND_INT:
-	[=lreg, imm] -> {
-		x86_mov_reg_imm(inst, $1, $2);
-		x86_mov_reg_reg(inst, %1, $1, 4);
-		x86_shift_reg_imm(inst, X86_SAR, %1, 31);
-	}
-	[=lreg, local] -> {
-		x86_mov_reg_membase(inst, $1, X86_EBP, $2, 4);
-		x86_mov_reg_reg(inst, %1, $1, 4);
-		x86_shift_reg_imm(inst, X86_SAR, %1, 31);
-	}
 	[=lreg, reg] -> {
 		if($1 != $2)
 		{
@@ -138,14 +128,6 @@ JIT_OP_EXPAND_INT:
 	}
 
 JIT_OP_EXPAND_UINT:
-	[=lreg, imm] -> {
-		x86_mov_reg_imm(inst, $1, $2);
-		x86_clear_reg(inst, %1);
-	}
-	[=lreg, local] -> {
-		x86_mov_reg_membase(inst, $1, X86_EBP, $2, 4);
-		x86_clear_reg(inst, %1);
-	}
 	[=lreg, reg] -> {
 		if($1 != $2)
 		{