You can not select more than 25 topics Topics must start with a letter or number, can include dashes ('-') and can be up to 35 characters long.

442 lines
14 KiB

/*
* This file is part of the MicroPython project, http://micropython.org/
*
* The MIT License (MIT)
*
* Copyright (c) 2016 Paul Sokolovsky
*
* Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person obtaining a copy
* of this software and associated documentation files (the "Software"), to deal
* in the Software without restriction, including without limitation the rights
* to use, copy, modify, merge, publish, distribute, sublicense, and/or sell
* copies of the Software, and to permit persons to whom the Software is
* furnished to do so, subject to the following conditions:
*
* The above copyright notice and this permission notice shall be included in
* all copies or substantial portions of the Software.
*
* THE SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED "AS IS", WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR
* IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY,
* FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND NONINFRINGEMENT. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE
* AUTHORS OR COPYRIGHT HOLDERS BE LIABLE FOR ANY CLAIM, DAMAGES OR OTHER
* LIABILITY, WHETHER IN AN ACTION OF CONTRACT, TORT OR OTHERWISE, ARISING FROM,
* OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE SOFTWARE OR THE USE OR OTHER DEALINGS IN
* THE SOFTWARE.
*/
#include "py/runtime.h"
#include "py/stream.h"
#if MICROPY_PY_BTREE
#include <stdio.h>
#include <errno.h> // for declaration of global errno variable
#include <fcntl.h>
// Undefine queue macros that will be defined in berkeley-db-1.xx headers
// below, in case they clash with system ones defined in headers above.
#undef LIST_HEAD
#undef LIST_ENTRY
#undef LIST_INIT
#undef LIST_INSERT_AFTER
#undef LIST_INSERT_HEAD
#undef LIST_REMOVE
#undef TAILQ_HEAD
#undef TAILQ_ENTRY
#undef TAILQ_INIT
#undef TAILQ_INSERT_HEAD
#undef TAILQ_INSERT_TAIL
#undef TAILQ_INSERT_AFTER
#undef TAILQ_REMOVE
#undef CIRCLEQ_HEAD
#undef CIRCLEQ_ENTRY
#undef CIRCLEQ_INIT
#undef CIRCLEQ_INSERT_AFTER
#undef CIRCLEQ_INSERT_BEFORE
#undef CIRCLEQ_INSERT_HEAD
#undef CIRCLEQ_INSERT_TAIL
#undef CIRCLEQ_REMOVE
#include "berkeley-db/db.h"
#include "berkeley-db/btree.h"
typedef struct _mp_obj_btree_t {
mp_obj_base_t base;
mp_obj_t stream; // retain a reference to prevent GC from reclaiming it
DB *db;
mp_obj_t start_key;
mp_obj_t end_key;
#define FLAG_END_KEY_INCL 1
#define FLAG_DESC 2
#define FLAG_ITER_TYPE_MASK 0xc0
#define FLAG_ITER_KEYS 0x40
#define FLAG_ITER_VALUES 0x80
#define FLAG_ITER_ITEMS 0xc0
byte flags;
byte next_flags;
} mp_obj_btree_t;
#if !MICROPY_ENABLE_DYNRUNTIME
all: Remove the &#34;STATIC&#34; macro and just use &#34;static&#34; instead. The STATIC macro was introduced a very long time ago in commit d5df6cd44a433d6253a61cb0f987835fbc06b2de. The original reason for this was to have the option to define it to nothing so that all static functions become global functions and therefore visible to certain debug tools, so one could do function size comparison and other things. This STATIC feature is rarely (if ever) used. And with the use of LTO and heavy inline optimisation, analysing the size of individual functions when they are not static is not a good representation of the size of code when fully optimised. So the macro does not have much use and it&#39;s simpler to just remove it. Then you know exactly what it&#39;s doing. For example, newcomers don&#39;t have to learn what the STATIC macro is and why it exists. Reading the code is also less &#34;loud&#34; with a lowercase static. One other minor point in favour of removing it, is that it stops bugs with `STATIC inline`, which should always be `static inline`. Methodology for this commit was: 1) git ls-files | egrep &#39;\.[ch]$&#39; | \ xargs sed -Ei &#34;s/(^| )STATIC($| )/\1static\2/&#34; 2) Do some manual cleanup in the diff by searching for the word STATIC in comments and changing those back. 3) &#34;git-grep STATIC docs/&#34;, manually fixed those cases. 4) &#34;rg -t python STATIC&#34;, manually fixed codegen lines that used STATIC. This work was funded through GitHub Sponsors. Signed-off-by: Angus Gratton &lt;angus@redyak.com.au&gt;
8 months ago
static const mp_obj_type_t btree_type;
#endif
#define CHECK_ERROR(res) \
if (res == RET_ERROR) { \
mp_raise_OSError(errno); \
}
void __dbpanic(DB *db) {
mp_printf(&mp_plat_print, "__dbpanic(%p)\n", db);
}
static void check_btree_is_open(mp_obj_btree_t *self) {
if (!self->db) {
mp_raise_ValueError(MP_ERROR_TEXT("database closed"));
}
}
all: Remove the &#34;STATIC&#34; macro and just use &#34;static&#34; instead. The STATIC macro was introduced a very long time ago in commit d5df6cd44a433d6253a61cb0f987835fbc06b2de. The original reason for this was to have the option to define it to nothing so that all static functions become global functions and therefore visible to certain debug tools, so one could do function size comparison and other things. This STATIC feature is rarely (if ever) used. And with the use of LTO and heavy inline optimisation, analysing the size of individual functions when they are not static is not a good representation of the size of code when fully optimised. So the macro does not have much use and it&#39;s simpler to just remove it. Then you know exactly what it&#39;s doing. For example, newcomers don&#39;t have to learn what the STATIC macro is and why it exists. Reading the code is also less &#34;loud&#34; with a lowercase static. One other minor point in favour of removing it, is that it stops bugs with `STATIC inline`, which should always be `static inline`. Methodology for this commit was: 1) git ls-files | egrep &#39;\.[ch]$&#39; | \ xargs sed -Ei &#34;s/(^| )STATIC($| )/\1static\2/&#34; 2) Do some manual cleanup in the diff by searching for the word STATIC in comments and changing those back. 3) &#34;git-grep STATIC docs/&#34;, manually fixed those cases. 4) &#34;rg -t python STATIC&#34;, manually fixed codegen lines that used STATIC. This work was funded through GitHub Sponsors. Signed-off-by: Angus Gratton &lt;angus@redyak.com.au&gt;
8 months ago
static mp_obj_btree_t *btree_new(DB *db, mp_obj_t stream) {
mp_obj_btree_t *o = mp_obj_malloc(mp_obj_btree_t, (mp_obj_type_t *)&btree_type);
o->stream = stream;
o->db = db;
o->start_key = mp_const_none;
o->end_key = mp_const_none;
o->next_flags = 0;
return o;
}
all: Remove the &#34;STATIC&#34; macro and just use &#34;static&#34; instead. The STATIC macro was introduced a very long time ago in commit d5df6cd44a433d6253a61cb0f987835fbc06b2de. The original reason for this was to have the option to define it to nothing so that all static functions become global functions and therefore visible to certain debug tools, so one could do function size comparison and other things. This STATIC feature is rarely (if ever) used. And with the use of LTO and heavy inline optimisation, analysing the size of individual functions when they are not static is not a good representation of the size of code when fully optimised. So the macro does not have much use and it&#39;s simpler to just remove it. Then you know exactly what it&#39;s doing. For example, newcomers don&#39;t have to learn what the STATIC macro is and why it exists. Reading the code is also less &#34;loud&#34; with a lowercase static. One other minor point in favour of removing it, is that it stops bugs with `STATIC inline`, which should always be `static inline`. Methodology for this commit was: 1) git ls-files | egrep &#39;\.[ch]$&#39; | \ xargs sed -Ei &#34;s/(^| )STATIC($| )/\1static\2/&#34; 2) Do some manual cleanup in the diff by searching for the word STATIC in comments and changing those back. 3) &#34;git-grep STATIC docs/&#34;, manually fixed those cases. 4) &#34;rg -t python STATIC&#34;, manually fixed codegen lines that used STATIC. This work was funded through GitHub Sponsors. Signed-off-by: Angus Gratton &lt;angus@redyak.com.au&gt;
8 months ago
static void buf_to_dbt(mp_obj_t obj, DBT *dbt) {
mp_buffer_info_t bufinfo;
mp_get_buffer_raise(obj, &bufinfo, MP_BUFFER_READ);
dbt->data = bufinfo.buf;
dbt->size = bufinfo.len;
}
all: Remove the &#34;STATIC&#34; macro and just use &#34;static&#34; instead. The STATIC macro was introduced a very long time ago in commit d5df6cd44a433d6253a61cb0f987835fbc06b2de. The original reason for this was to have the option to define it to nothing so that all static functions become global functions and therefore visible to certain debug tools, so one could do function size comparison and other things. This STATIC feature is rarely (if ever) used. And with the use of LTO and heavy inline optimisation, analysing the size of individual functions when they are not static is not a good representation of the size of code when fully optimised. So the macro does not have much use and it&#39;s simpler to just remove it. Then you know exactly what it&#39;s doing. For example, newcomers don&#39;t have to learn what the STATIC macro is and why it exists. Reading the code is also less &#34;loud&#34; with a lowercase static. One other minor point in favour of removing it, is that it stops bugs with `STATIC inline`, which should always be `static inline`. Methodology for this commit was: 1) git ls-files | egrep &#39;\.[ch]$&#39; | \ xargs sed -Ei &#34;s/(^| )STATIC($| )/\1static\2/&#34; 2) Do some manual cleanup in the diff by searching for the word STATIC in comments and changing those back. 3) &#34;git-grep STATIC docs/&#34;, manually fixed those cases. 4) &#34;rg -t python STATIC&#34;, manually fixed codegen lines that used STATIC. This work was funded through GitHub Sponsors. Signed-off-by: Angus Gratton &lt;angus@redyak.com.au&gt;
8 months ago
static void btree_print(const mp_print_t *print, mp_obj_t self_in, mp_print_kind_t kind) {
(void)kind;
mp_obj_btree_t *self = MP_OBJ_TO_PTR(self_in);
mp_printf(print, "<btree %p>", self->db);
}
all: Remove the &#34;STATIC&#34; macro and just use &#34;static&#34; instead. The STATIC macro was introduced a very long time ago in commit d5df6cd44a433d6253a61cb0f987835fbc06b2de. The original reason for this was to have the option to define it to nothing so that all static functions become global functions and therefore visible to certain debug tools, so one could do function size comparison and other things. This STATIC feature is rarely (if ever) used. And with the use of LTO and heavy inline optimisation, analysing the size of individual functions when they are not static is not a good representation of the size of code when fully optimised. So the macro does not have much use and it&#39;s simpler to just remove it. Then you know exactly what it&#39;s doing. For example, newcomers don&#39;t have to learn what the STATIC macro is and why it exists. Reading the code is also less &#34;loud&#34; with a lowercase static. One other minor point in favour of removing it, is that it stops bugs with `STATIC inline`, which should always be `static inline`. Methodology for this commit was: 1) git ls-files | egrep &#39;\.[ch]$&#39; | \ xargs sed -Ei &#34;s/(^| )STATIC($| )/\1static\2/&#34; 2) Do some manual cleanup in the diff by searching for the word STATIC in comments and changing those back. 3) &#34;git-grep STATIC docs/&#34;, manually fixed those cases. 4) &#34;rg -t python STATIC&#34;, manually fixed codegen lines that used STATIC. This work was funded through GitHub Sponsors. Signed-off-by: Angus Gratton &lt;angus@redyak.com.au&gt;
8 months ago
static mp_obj_t btree_flush(mp_obj_t self_in) {
mp_obj_btree_t *self = MP_OBJ_TO_PTR(self_in);
check_btree_is_open(self);
return MP_OBJ_NEW_SMALL_INT(__bt_sync(self->db, 0));
}
all: Remove the &#34;STATIC&#34; macro and just use &#34;static&#34; instead. The STATIC macro was introduced a very long time ago in commit d5df6cd44a433d6253a61cb0f987835fbc06b2de. The original reason for this was to have the option to define it to nothing so that all static functions become global functions and therefore visible to certain debug tools, so one could do function size comparison and other things. This STATIC feature is rarely (if ever) used. And with the use of LTO and heavy inline optimisation, analysing the size of individual functions when they are not static is not a good representation of the size of code when fully optimised. So the macro does not have much use and it&#39;s simpler to just remove it. Then you know exactly what it&#39;s doing. For example, newcomers don&#39;t have to learn what the STATIC macro is and why it exists. Reading the code is also less &#34;loud&#34; with a lowercase static. One other minor point in favour of removing it, is that it stops bugs with `STATIC inline`, which should always be `static inline`. Methodology for this commit was: 1) git ls-files | egrep &#39;\.[ch]$&#39; | \ xargs sed -Ei &#34;s/(^| )STATIC($| )/\1static\2/&#34; 2) Do some manual cleanup in the diff by searching for the word STATIC in comments and changing those back. 3) &#34;git-grep STATIC docs/&#34;, manually fixed those cases. 4) &#34;rg -t python STATIC&#34;, manually fixed codegen lines that used STATIC. This work was funded through GitHub Sponsors. Signed-off-by: Angus Gratton &lt;angus@redyak.com.au&gt;
8 months ago
static MP_DEFINE_CONST_FUN_OBJ_1(btree_flush_obj, btree_flush);
all: Remove the &#34;STATIC&#34; macro and just use &#34;static&#34; instead. The STATIC macro was introduced a very long time ago in commit d5df6cd44a433d6253a61cb0f987835fbc06b2de. The original reason for this was to have the option to define it to nothing so that all static functions become global functions and therefore visible to certain debug tools, so one could do function size comparison and other things. This STATIC feature is rarely (if ever) used. And with the use of LTO and heavy inline optimisation, analysing the size of individual functions when they are not static is not a good representation of the size of code when fully optimised. So the macro does not have much use and it&#39;s simpler to just remove it. Then you know exactly what it&#39;s doing. For example, newcomers don&#39;t have to learn what the STATIC macro is and why it exists. Reading the code is also less &#34;loud&#34; with a lowercase static. One other minor point in favour of removing it, is that it stops bugs with `STATIC inline`, which should always be `static inline`. Methodology for this commit was: 1) git ls-files | egrep &#39;\.[ch]$&#39; | \ xargs sed -Ei &#34;s/(^| )STATIC($| )/\1static\2/&#34; 2) Do some manual cleanup in the diff by searching for the word STATIC in comments and changing those back. 3) &#34;git-grep STATIC docs/&#34;, manually fixed those cases. 4) &#34;rg -t python STATIC&#34;, manually fixed codegen lines that used STATIC. This work was funded through GitHub Sponsors. Signed-off-by: Angus Gratton &lt;angus@redyak.com.au&gt;
8 months ago
static mp_obj_t btree_close(mp_obj_t self_in) {
mp_obj_btree_t *self = MP_OBJ_TO_PTR(self_in);
int res;
if (self->db) {
res = __bt_close(self->db);
self->db = NULL;
} else {
res = RET_SUCCESS; // Closing an already-closed DB always succeeds.
}
return MP_OBJ_NEW_SMALL_INT(res);
}
all: Remove the &#34;STATIC&#34; macro and just use &#34;static&#34; instead. The STATIC macro was introduced a very long time ago in commit d5df6cd44a433d6253a61cb0f987835fbc06b2de. The original reason for this was to have the option to define it to nothing so that all static functions become global functions and therefore visible to certain debug tools, so one could do function size comparison and other things. This STATIC feature is rarely (if ever) used. And with the use of LTO and heavy inline optimisation, analysing the size of individual functions when they are not static is not a good representation of the size of code when fully optimised. So the macro does not have much use and it&#39;s simpler to just remove it. Then you know exactly what it&#39;s doing. For example, newcomers don&#39;t have to learn what the STATIC macro is and why it exists. Reading the code is also less &#34;loud&#34; with a lowercase static. One other minor point in favour of removing it, is that it stops bugs with `STATIC inline`, which should always be `static inline`. Methodology for this commit was: 1) git ls-files | egrep &#39;\.[ch]$&#39; | \ xargs sed -Ei &#34;s/(^| )STATIC($| )/\1static\2/&#34; 2) Do some manual cleanup in the diff by searching for the word STATIC in comments and changing those back. 3) &#34;git-grep STATIC docs/&#34;, manually fixed those cases. 4) &#34;rg -t python STATIC&#34;, manually fixed codegen lines that used STATIC. This work was funded through GitHub Sponsors. Signed-off-by: Angus Gratton &lt;angus@redyak.com.au&gt;
8 months ago
static MP_DEFINE_CONST_FUN_OBJ_1(btree_close_obj, btree_close);
all: Remove the &#34;STATIC&#34; macro and just use &#34;static&#34; instead. The STATIC macro was introduced a very long time ago in commit d5df6cd44a433d6253a61cb0f987835fbc06b2de. The original reason for this was to have the option to define it to nothing so that all static functions become global functions and therefore visible to certain debug tools, so one could do function size comparison and other things. This STATIC feature is rarely (if ever) used. And with the use of LTO and heavy inline optimisation, analysing the size of individual functions when they are not static is not a good representation of the size of code when fully optimised. So the macro does not have much use and it&#39;s simpler to just remove it. Then you know exactly what it&#39;s doing. For example, newcomers don&#39;t have to learn what the STATIC macro is and why it exists. Reading the code is also less &#34;loud&#34; with a lowercase static. One other minor point in favour of removing it, is that it stops bugs with `STATIC inline`, which should always be `static inline`. Methodology for this commit was: 1) git ls-files | egrep &#39;\.[ch]$&#39; | \ xargs sed -Ei &#34;s/(^| )STATIC($| )/\1static\2/&#34; 2) Do some manual cleanup in the diff by searching for the word STATIC in comments and changing those back. 3) &#34;git-grep STATIC docs/&#34;, manually fixed those cases. 4) &#34;rg -t python STATIC&#34;, manually fixed codegen lines that used STATIC. This work was funded through GitHub Sponsors. Signed-off-by: Angus Gratton &lt;angus@redyak.com.au&gt;
8 months ago
static mp_obj_t btree_put(size_t n_args, const mp_obj_t *args) {
(void)n_args;
mp_obj_btree_t *self = MP_OBJ_TO_PTR(args[0]);
check_btree_is_open(self);
DBT key, val;
buf_to_dbt(args[1], &key);
buf_to_dbt(args[2], &val);
return MP_OBJ_NEW_SMALL_INT(__bt_put(self->db, &key, &val, 0));
}
all: Remove the &#34;STATIC&#34; macro and just use &#34;static&#34; instead. The STATIC macro was introduced a very long time ago in commit d5df6cd44a433d6253a61cb0f987835fbc06b2de. The original reason for this was to have the option to define it to nothing so that all static functions become global functions and therefore visible to certain debug tools, so one could do function size comparison and other things. This STATIC feature is rarely (if ever) used. And with the use of LTO and heavy inline optimisation, analysing the size of individual functions when they are not static is not a good representation of the size of code when fully optimised. So the macro does not have much use and it&#39;s simpler to just remove it. Then you know exactly what it&#39;s doing. For example, newcomers don&#39;t have to learn what the STATIC macro is and why it exists. Reading the code is also less &#34;loud&#34; with a lowercase static. One other minor point in favour of removing it, is that it stops bugs with `STATIC inline`, which should always be `static inline`. Methodology for this commit was: 1) git ls-files | egrep &#39;\.[ch]$&#39; | \ xargs sed -Ei &#34;s/(^| )STATIC($| )/\1static\2/&#34; 2) Do some manual cleanup in the diff by searching for the word STATIC in comments and changing those back. 3) &#34;git-grep STATIC docs/&#34;, manually fixed those cases. 4) &#34;rg -t python STATIC&#34;, manually fixed codegen lines that used STATIC. This work was funded through GitHub Sponsors. Signed-off-by: Angus Gratton &lt;angus@redyak.com.au&gt;
8 months ago
static MP_DEFINE_CONST_FUN_OBJ_VAR_BETWEEN(btree_put_obj, 3, 4, btree_put);
all: Remove the &#34;STATIC&#34; macro and just use &#34;static&#34; instead. The STATIC macro was introduced a very long time ago in commit d5df6cd44a433d6253a61cb0f987835fbc06b2de. The original reason for this was to have the option to define it to nothing so that all static functions become global functions and therefore visible to certain debug tools, so one could do function size comparison and other things. This STATIC feature is rarely (if ever) used. And with the use of LTO and heavy inline optimisation, analysing the size of individual functions when they are not static is not a good representation of the size of code when fully optimised. So the macro does not have much use and it&#39;s simpler to just remove it. Then you know exactly what it&#39;s doing. For example, newcomers don&#39;t have to learn what the STATIC macro is and why it exists. Reading the code is also less &#34;loud&#34; with a lowercase static. One other minor point in favour of removing it, is that it stops bugs with `STATIC inline`, which should always be `static inline`. Methodology for this commit was: 1) git ls-files | egrep &#39;\.[ch]$&#39; | \ xargs sed -Ei &#34;s/(^| )STATIC($| )/\1static\2/&#34; 2) Do some manual cleanup in the diff by searching for the word STATIC in comments and changing those back. 3) &#34;git-grep STATIC docs/&#34;, manually fixed those cases. 4) &#34;rg -t python STATIC&#34;, manually fixed codegen lines that used STATIC. This work was funded through GitHub Sponsors. Signed-off-by: Angus Gratton &lt;angus@redyak.com.au&gt;
8 months ago
static mp_obj_t btree_get(size_t n_args, const mp_obj_t *args) {
mp_obj_btree_t *self = MP_OBJ_TO_PTR(args[0]);
check_btree_is_open(self);
DBT key, val;
buf_to_dbt(args[1], &key);
int res = __bt_get(self->db, &key, &val, 0);
if (res == RET_SPECIAL) {
if (n_args > 2) {
return args[2];
} else {
return mp_const_none;
}
}
CHECK_ERROR(res);
return mp_obj_new_bytes(val.data, val.size);
}
all: Remove the &#34;STATIC&#34; macro and just use &#34;static&#34; instead. The STATIC macro was introduced a very long time ago in commit d5df6cd44a433d6253a61cb0f987835fbc06b2de. The original reason for this was to have the option to define it to nothing so that all static functions become global functions and therefore visible to certain debug tools, so one could do function size comparison and other things. This STATIC feature is rarely (if ever) used. And with the use of LTO and heavy inline optimisation, analysing the size of individual functions when they are not static is not a good representation of the size of code when fully optimised. So the macro does not have much use and it&#39;s simpler to just remove it. Then you know exactly what it&#39;s doing. For example, newcomers don&#39;t have to learn what the STATIC macro is and why it exists. Reading the code is also less &#34;loud&#34; with a lowercase static. One other minor point in favour of removing it, is that it stops bugs with `STATIC inline`, which should always be `static inline`. Methodology for this commit was: 1) git ls-files | egrep &#39;\.[ch]$&#39; | \ xargs sed -Ei &#34;s/(^| )STATIC($| )/\1static\2/&#34; 2) Do some manual cleanup in the diff by searching for the word STATIC in comments and changing those back. 3) &#34;git-grep STATIC docs/&#34;, manually fixed those cases. 4) &#34;rg -t python STATIC&#34;, manually fixed codegen lines that used STATIC. This work was funded through GitHub Sponsors. Signed-off-by: Angus Gratton &lt;angus@redyak.com.au&gt;
8 months ago
static MP_DEFINE_CONST_FUN_OBJ_VAR_BETWEEN(btree_get_obj, 2, 3, btree_get);
all: Remove the &#34;STATIC&#34; macro and just use &#34;static&#34; instead. The STATIC macro was introduced a very long time ago in commit d5df6cd44a433d6253a61cb0f987835fbc06b2de. The original reason for this was to have the option to define it to nothing so that all static functions become global functions and therefore visible to certain debug tools, so one could do function size comparison and other things. This STATIC feature is rarely (if ever) used. And with the use of LTO and heavy inline optimisation, analysing the size of individual functions when they are not static is not a good representation of the size of code when fully optimised. So the macro does not have much use and it&#39;s simpler to just remove it. Then you know exactly what it&#39;s doing. For example, newcomers don&#39;t have to learn what the STATIC macro is and why it exists. Reading the code is also less &#34;loud&#34; with a lowercase static. One other minor point in favour of removing it, is that it stops bugs with `STATIC inline`, which should always be `static inline`. Methodology for this commit was: 1) git ls-files | egrep &#39;\.[ch]$&#39; | \ xargs sed -Ei &#34;s/(^| )STATIC($| )/\1static\2/&#34; 2) Do some manual cleanup in the diff by searching for the word STATIC in comments and changing those back. 3) &#34;git-grep STATIC docs/&#34;, manually fixed those cases. 4) &#34;rg -t python STATIC&#34;, manually fixed codegen lines that used STATIC. This work was funded through GitHub Sponsors. Signed-off-by: Angus Gratton &lt;angus@redyak.com.au&gt;
8 months ago
static mp_obj_t btree_seq(size_t n_args, const mp_obj_t *args) {
mp_obj_btree_t *self = MP_OBJ_TO_PTR(args[0]);
check_btree_is_open(self);
int flags = MP_OBJ_SMALL_INT_VALUE(args[1]);
DBT key, val;
if (n_args > 2) {
buf_to_dbt(args[2], &key);
}
int res = __bt_seq(self->db, &key, &val, flags);
CHECK_ERROR(res);
if (res == RET_SPECIAL) {
return mp_const_none;
}
mp_obj_t pair_o = mp_obj_new_tuple(2, NULL);
mp_obj_tuple_t *pair = MP_OBJ_TO_PTR(pair_o);
pair->items[0] = mp_obj_new_bytes(key.data, key.size);
pair->items[1] = mp_obj_new_bytes(val.data, val.size);
return pair_o;
}
all: Remove the &#34;STATIC&#34; macro and just use &#34;static&#34; instead. The STATIC macro was introduced a very long time ago in commit d5df6cd44a433d6253a61cb0f987835fbc06b2de. The original reason for this was to have the option to define it to nothing so that all static functions become global functions and therefore visible to certain debug tools, so one could do function size comparison and other things. This STATIC feature is rarely (if ever) used. And with the use of LTO and heavy inline optimisation, analysing the size of individual functions when they are not static is not a good representation of the size of code when fully optimised. So the macro does not have much use and it&#39;s simpler to just remove it. Then you know exactly what it&#39;s doing. For example, newcomers don&#39;t have to learn what the STATIC macro is and why it exists. Reading the code is also less &#34;loud&#34; with a lowercase static. One other minor point in favour of removing it, is that it stops bugs with `STATIC inline`, which should always be `static inline`. Methodology for this commit was: 1) git ls-files | egrep &#39;\.[ch]$&#39; | \ xargs sed -Ei &#34;s/(^| )STATIC($| )/\1static\2/&#34; 2) Do some manual cleanup in the diff by searching for the word STATIC in comments and changing those back. 3) &#34;git-grep STATIC docs/&#34;, manually fixed those cases. 4) &#34;rg -t python STATIC&#34;, manually fixed codegen lines that used STATIC. This work was funded through GitHub Sponsors. Signed-off-by: Angus Gratton &lt;angus@redyak.com.au&gt;
8 months ago
static MP_DEFINE_CONST_FUN_OBJ_VAR_BETWEEN(btree_seq_obj, 2, 4, btree_seq);
all: Remove the &#34;STATIC&#34; macro and just use &#34;static&#34; instead. The STATIC macro was introduced a very long time ago in commit d5df6cd44a433d6253a61cb0f987835fbc06b2de. The original reason for this was to have the option to define it to nothing so that all static functions become global functions and therefore visible to certain debug tools, so one could do function size comparison and other things. This STATIC feature is rarely (if ever) used. And with the use of LTO and heavy inline optimisation, analysing the size of individual functions when they are not static is not a good representation of the size of code when fully optimised. So the macro does not have much use and it&#39;s simpler to just remove it. Then you know exactly what it&#39;s doing. For example, newcomers don&#39;t have to learn what the STATIC macro is and why it exists. Reading the code is also less &#34;loud&#34; with a lowercase static. One other minor point in favour of removing it, is that it stops bugs with `STATIC inline`, which should always be `static inline`. Methodology for this commit was: 1) git ls-files | egrep &#39;\.[ch]$&#39; | \ xargs sed -Ei &#34;s/(^| )STATIC($| )/\1static\2/&#34; 2) Do some manual cleanup in the diff by searching for the word STATIC in comments and changing those back. 3) &#34;git-grep STATIC docs/&#34;, manually fixed those cases. 4) &#34;rg -t python STATIC&#34;, manually fixed codegen lines that used STATIC. This work was funded through GitHub Sponsors. Signed-off-by: Angus Gratton &lt;angus@redyak.com.au&gt;
8 months ago
static mp_obj_t btree_init_iter(size_t n_args, const mp_obj_t *args, byte type) {
mp_obj_btree_t *self = MP_OBJ_TO_PTR(args[0]);
self->next_flags = type;
self->start_key = mp_const_none;
self->end_key = mp_const_none;
if (n_args > 1) {
self->start_key = args[1];
if (n_args > 2) {
self->end_key = args[2];
if (n_args > 3) {
self->next_flags = type | MP_OBJ_SMALL_INT_VALUE(args[3]);
}
}
}
return args[0];
}
all: Remove the &#34;STATIC&#34; macro and just use &#34;static&#34; instead. The STATIC macro was introduced a very long time ago in commit d5df6cd44a433d6253a61cb0f987835fbc06b2de. The original reason for this was to have the option to define it to nothing so that all static functions become global functions and therefore visible to certain debug tools, so one could do function size comparison and other things. This STATIC feature is rarely (if ever) used. And with the use of LTO and heavy inline optimisation, analysing the size of individual functions when they are not static is not a good representation of the size of code when fully optimised. So the macro does not have much use and it&#39;s simpler to just remove it. Then you know exactly what it&#39;s doing. For example, newcomers don&#39;t have to learn what the STATIC macro is and why it exists. Reading the code is also less &#34;loud&#34; with a lowercase static. One other minor point in favour of removing it, is that it stops bugs with `STATIC inline`, which should always be `static inline`. Methodology for this commit was: 1) git ls-files | egrep &#39;\.[ch]$&#39; | \ xargs sed -Ei &#34;s/(^| )STATIC($| )/\1static\2/&#34; 2) Do some manual cleanup in the diff by searching for the word STATIC in comments and changing those back. 3) &#34;git-grep STATIC docs/&#34;, manually fixed those cases. 4) &#34;rg -t python STATIC&#34;, manually fixed codegen lines that used STATIC. This work was funded through GitHub Sponsors. Signed-off-by: Angus Gratton &lt;angus@redyak.com.au&gt;
8 months ago
static mp_obj_t btree_keys(size_t n_args, const mp_obj_t *args) {
return btree_init_iter(n_args, args, FLAG_ITER_KEYS);
}
all: Remove the &#34;STATIC&#34; macro and just use &#34;static&#34; instead. The STATIC macro was introduced a very long time ago in commit d5df6cd44a433d6253a61cb0f987835fbc06b2de. The original reason for this was to have the option to define it to nothing so that all static functions become global functions and therefore visible to certain debug tools, so one could do function size comparison and other things. This STATIC feature is rarely (if ever) used. And with the use of LTO and heavy inline optimisation, analysing the size of individual functions when they are not static is not a good representation of the size of code when fully optimised. So the macro does not have much use and it&#39;s simpler to just remove it. Then you know exactly what it&#39;s doing. For example, newcomers don&#39;t have to learn what the STATIC macro is and why it exists. Reading the code is also less &#34;loud&#34; with a lowercase static. One other minor point in favour of removing it, is that it stops bugs with `STATIC inline`, which should always be `static inline`. Methodology for this commit was: 1) git ls-files | egrep &#39;\.[ch]$&#39; | \ xargs sed -Ei &#34;s/(^| )STATIC($| )/\1static\2/&#34; 2) Do some manual cleanup in the diff by searching for the word STATIC in comments and changing those back. 3) &#34;git-grep STATIC docs/&#34;, manually fixed those cases. 4) &#34;rg -t python STATIC&#34;, manually fixed codegen lines that used STATIC. This work was funded through GitHub Sponsors. Signed-off-by: Angus Gratton &lt;angus@redyak.com.au&gt;
8 months ago
static MP_DEFINE_CONST_FUN_OBJ_VAR_BETWEEN(btree_keys_obj, 1, 4, btree_keys);
all: Remove the &#34;STATIC&#34; macro and just use &#34;static&#34; instead. The STATIC macro was introduced a very long time ago in commit d5df6cd44a433d6253a61cb0f987835fbc06b2de. The original reason for this was to have the option to define it to nothing so that all static functions become global functions and therefore visible to certain debug tools, so one could do function size comparison and other things. This STATIC feature is rarely (if ever) used. And with the use of LTO and heavy inline optimisation, analysing the size of individual functions when they are not static is not a good representation of the size of code when fully optimised. So the macro does not have much use and it&#39;s simpler to just remove it. Then you know exactly what it&#39;s doing. For example, newcomers don&#39;t have to learn what the STATIC macro is and why it exists. Reading the code is also less &#34;loud&#34; with a lowercase static. One other minor point in favour of removing it, is that it stops bugs with `STATIC inline`, which should always be `static inline`. Methodology for this commit was: 1) git ls-files | egrep &#39;\.[ch]$&#39; | \ xargs sed -Ei &#34;s/(^| )STATIC($| )/\1static\2/&#34; 2) Do some manual cleanup in the diff by searching for the word STATIC in comments and changing those back. 3) &#34;git-grep STATIC docs/&#34;, manually fixed those cases. 4) &#34;rg -t python STATIC&#34;, manually fixed codegen lines that used STATIC. This work was funded through GitHub Sponsors. Signed-off-by: Angus Gratton &lt;angus@redyak.com.au&gt;
8 months ago
static mp_obj_t btree_values(size_t n_args, const mp_obj_t *args) {
return btree_init_iter(n_args, args, FLAG_ITER_VALUES);
}
all: Remove the &#34;STATIC&#34; macro and just use &#34;static&#34; instead. The STATIC macro was introduced a very long time ago in commit d5df6cd44a433d6253a61cb0f987835fbc06b2de. The original reason for this was to have the option to define it to nothing so that all static functions become global functions and therefore visible to certain debug tools, so one could do function size comparison and other things. This STATIC feature is rarely (if ever) used. And with the use of LTO and heavy inline optimisation, analysing the size of individual functions when they are not static is not a good representation of the size of code when fully optimised. So the macro does not have much use and it&#39;s simpler to just remove it. Then you know exactly what it&#39;s doing. For example, newcomers don&#39;t have to learn what the STATIC macro is and why it exists. Reading the code is also less &#34;loud&#34; with a lowercase static. One other minor point in favour of removing it, is that it stops bugs with `STATIC inline`, which should always be `static inline`. Methodology for this commit was: 1) git ls-files | egrep &#39;\.[ch]$&#39; | \ xargs sed -Ei &#34;s/(^| )STATIC($| )/\1static\2/&#34; 2) Do some manual cleanup in the diff by searching for the word STATIC in comments and changing those back. 3) &#34;git-grep STATIC docs/&#34;, manually fixed those cases. 4) &#34;rg -t python STATIC&#34;, manually fixed codegen lines that used STATIC. This work was funded through GitHub Sponsors. Signed-off-by: Angus Gratton &lt;angus@redyak.com.au&gt;
8 months ago
static MP_DEFINE_CONST_FUN_OBJ_VAR_BETWEEN(btree_values_obj, 1, 4, btree_values);
all: Remove the &#34;STATIC&#34; macro and just use &#34;static&#34; instead. The STATIC macro was introduced a very long time ago in commit d5df6cd44a433d6253a61cb0f987835fbc06b2de. The original reason for this was to have the option to define it to nothing so that all static functions become global functions and therefore visible to certain debug tools, so one could do function size comparison and other things. This STATIC feature is rarely (if ever) used. And with the use of LTO and heavy inline optimisation, analysing the size of individual functions when they are not static is not a good representation of the size of code when fully optimised. So the macro does not have much use and it&#39;s simpler to just remove it. Then you know exactly what it&#39;s doing. For example, newcomers don&#39;t have to learn what the STATIC macro is and why it exists. Reading the code is also less &#34;loud&#34; with a lowercase static. One other minor point in favour of removing it, is that it stops bugs with `STATIC inline`, which should always be `static inline`. Methodology for this commit was: 1) git ls-files | egrep &#39;\.[ch]$&#39; | \ xargs sed -Ei &#34;s/(^| )STATIC($| )/\1static\2/&#34; 2) Do some manual cleanup in the diff by searching for the word STATIC in comments and changing those back. 3) &#34;git-grep STATIC docs/&#34;, manually fixed those cases. 4) &#34;rg -t python STATIC&#34;, manually fixed codegen lines that used STATIC. This work was funded through GitHub Sponsors. Signed-off-by: Angus Gratton &lt;angus@redyak.com.au&gt;
8 months ago
static mp_obj_t btree_items(size_t n_args, const mp_obj_t *args) {
return btree_init_iter(n_args, args, FLAG_ITER_ITEMS);
}
all: Remove the &#34;STATIC&#34; macro and just use &#34;static&#34; instead. The STATIC macro was introduced a very long time ago in commit d5df6cd44a433d6253a61cb0f987835fbc06b2de. The original reason for this was to have the option to define it to nothing so that all static functions become global functions and therefore visible to certain debug tools, so one could do function size comparison and other things. This STATIC feature is rarely (if ever) used. And with the use of LTO and heavy inline optimisation, analysing the size of individual functions when they are not static is not a good representation of the size of code when fully optimised. So the macro does not have much use and it&#39;s simpler to just remove it. Then you know exactly what it&#39;s doing. For example, newcomers don&#39;t have to learn what the STATIC macro is and why it exists. Reading the code is also less &#34;loud&#34; with a lowercase static. One other minor point in favour of removing it, is that it stops bugs with `STATIC inline`, which should always be `static inline`. Methodology for this commit was: 1) git ls-files | egrep &#39;\.[ch]$&#39; | \ xargs sed -Ei &#34;s/(^| )STATIC($| )/\1static\2/&#34; 2) Do some manual cleanup in the diff by searching for the word STATIC in comments and changing those back. 3) &#34;git-grep STATIC docs/&#34;, manually fixed those cases. 4) &#34;rg -t python STATIC&#34;, manually fixed codegen lines that used STATIC. This work was funded through GitHub Sponsors. Signed-off-by: Angus Gratton &lt;angus@redyak.com.au&gt;
8 months ago
static MP_DEFINE_CONST_FUN_OBJ_VAR_BETWEEN(btree_items_obj, 1, 4, btree_items);
all: Remove the &#34;STATIC&#34; macro and just use &#34;static&#34; instead. The STATIC macro was introduced a very long time ago in commit d5df6cd44a433d6253a61cb0f987835fbc06b2de. The original reason for this was to have the option to define it to nothing so that all static functions become global functions and therefore visible to certain debug tools, so one could do function size comparison and other things. This STATIC feature is rarely (if ever) used. And with the use of LTO and heavy inline optimisation, analysing the size of individual functions when they are not static is not a good representation of the size of code when fully optimised. So the macro does not have much use and it&#39;s simpler to just remove it. Then you know exactly what it&#39;s doing. For example, newcomers don&#39;t have to learn what the STATIC macro is and why it exists. Reading the code is also less &#34;loud&#34; with a lowercase static. One other minor point in favour of removing it, is that it stops bugs with `STATIC inline`, which should always be `static inline`. Methodology for this commit was: 1) git ls-files | egrep &#39;\.[ch]$&#39; | \ xargs sed -Ei &#34;s/(^| )STATIC($| )/\1static\2/&#34; 2) Do some manual cleanup in the diff by searching for the word STATIC in comments and changing those back. 3) &#34;git-grep STATIC docs/&#34;, manually fixed those cases. 4) &#34;rg -t python STATIC&#34;, manually fixed codegen lines that used STATIC. This work was funded through GitHub Sponsors. Signed-off-by: Angus Gratton &lt;angus@redyak.com.au&gt;
8 months ago
static mp_obj_t btree_getiter(mp_obj_t self_in, mp_obj_iter_buf_t *iter_buf) {
(void)iter_buf;
mp_obj_btree_t *self = MP_OBJ_TO_PTR(self_in);
if (self->next_flags != 0) {
// If we're called immediately after keys(), values(), or items(),
// use their setup for iteration.
self->flags = self->next_flags;
self->next_flags = 0;
} else {
// Otherwise, iterate over all keys.
self->flags = FLAG_ITER_KEYS;
self->start_key = mp_const_none;
self->end_key = mp_const_none;
}
return self_in;
}
all: Remove the &#34;STATIC&#34; macro and just use &#34;static&#34; instead. The STATIC macro was introduced a very long time ago in commit d5df6cd44a433d6253a61cb0f987835fbc06b2de. The original reason for this was to have the option to define it to nothing so that all static functions become global functions and therefore visible to certain debug tools, so one could do function size comparison and other things. This STATIC feature is rarely (if ever) used. And with the use of LTO and heavy inline optimisation, analysing the size of individual functions when they are not static is not a good representation of the size of code when fully optimised. So the macro does not have much use and it&#39;s simpler to just remove it. Then you know exactly what it&#39;s doing. For example, newcomers don&#39;t have to learn what the STATIC macro is and why it exists. Reading the code is also less &#34;loud&#34; with a lowercase static. One other minor point in favour of removing it, is that it stops bugs with `STATIC inline`, which should always be `static inline`. Methodology for this commit was: 1) git ls-files | egrep &#39;\.[ch]$&#39; | \ xargs sed -Ei &#34;s/(^| )STATIC($| )/\1static\2/&#34; 2) Do some manual cleanup in the diff by searching for the word STATIC in comments and changing those back. 3) &#34;git-grep STATIC docs/&#34;, manually fixed those cases. 4) &#34;rg -t python STATIC&#34;, manually fixed codegen lines that used STATIC. This work was funded through GitHub Sponsors. Signed-off-by: Angus Gratton &lt;angus@redyak.com.au&gt;
8 months ago
static mp_obj_t btree_iternext(mp_obj_t self_in) {
mp_obj_btree_t *self = MP_OBJ_TO_PTR(self_in);
check_btree_is_open(self);
DBT key, val;
int res;
bool desc = self->flags & FLAG_DESC;
if (self->start_key != MP_OBJ_NULL) {
int flags = R_FIRST;
if (self->start_key != mp_const_none) {
buf_to_dbt(self->start_key, &key);
flags = R_CURSOR;
} else if (desc) {
flags = R_LAST;
}
res = __bt_seq(self->db, &key, &val, flags);
self->start_key = MP_OBJ_NULL;
} else {
res = __bt_seq(self->db, &key, &val, desc ? R_PREV : R_NEXT);
}
if (res == RET_SPECIAL) {
return MP_OBJ_STOP_ITERATION;
}
CHECK_ERROR(res);
if (self->end_key != mp_const_none) {
DBT end_key;
buf_to_dbt(self->end_key, &end_key);
BTREE *t = self->db->internal;
int cmp = t->bt_cmp(&key, &end_key);
if (desc) {
cmp = -cmp;
}
if (self->flags & FLAG_END_KEY_INCL) {
cmp--;
}
if (cmp >= 0) {
self->end_key = MP_OBJ_NULL;
return MP_OBJ_STOP_ITERATION;
}
}
switch (self->flags & FLAG_ITER_TYPE_MASK) {
case FLAG_ITER_KEYS:
return mp_obj_new_bytes(key.data, key.size);
case FLAG_ITER_VALUES:
return mp_obj_new_bytes(val.data, val.size);
default: {
mp_obj_t pair_o = mp_obj_new_tuple(2, NULL);
mp_obj_tuple_t *pair = MP_OBJ_TO_PTR(pair_o);
pair->items[0] = mp_obj_new_bytes(key.data, key.size);
pair->items[1] = mp_obj_new_bytes(val.data, val.size);
return pair_o;
}
}
}
all: Remove the &#34;STATIC&#34; macro and just use &#34;static&#34; instead. The STATIC macro was introduced a very long time ago in commit d5df6cd44a433d6253a61cb0f987835fbc06b2de. The original reason for this was to have the option to define it to nothing so that all static functions become global functions and therefore visible to certain debug tools, so one could do function size comparison and other things. This STATIC feature is rarely (if ever) used. And with the use of LTO and heavy inline optimisation, analysing the size of individual functions when they are not static is not a good representation of the size of code when fully optimised. So the macro does not have much use and it&#39;s simpler to just remove it. Then you know exactly what it&#39;s doing. For example, newcomers don&#39;t have to learn what the STATIC macro is and why it exists. Reading the code is also less &#34;loud&#34; with a lowercase static. One other minor point in favour of removing it, is that it stops bugs with `STATIC inline`, which should always be `static inline`. Methodology for this commit was: 1) git ls-files | egrep &#39;\.[ch]$&#39; | \ xargs sed -Ei &#34;s/(^| )STATIC($| )/\1static\2/&#34; 2) Do some manual cleanup in the diff by searching for the word STATIC in comments and changing those back. 3) &#34;git-grep STATIC docs/&#34;, manually fixed those cases. 4) &#34;rg -t python STATIC&#34;, manually fixed codegen lines that used STATIC. This work was funded through GitHub Sponsors. Signed-off-by: Angus Gratton &lt;angus@redyak.com.au&gt;
8 months ago
static mp_obj_t btree_subscr(mp_obj_t self_in, mp_obj_t index, mp_obj_t value) {
mp_obj_btree_t *self = MP_OBJ_TO_PTR(self_in);
check_btree_is_open(self);
if (value == MP_OBJ_NULL) {
// delete
DBT key;
buf_to_dbt(index, &key);
int res = __bt_delete(self->db, &key, 0);
if (res == RET_SPECIAL) {
mp_raise_type(&mp_type_KeyError);
}
CHECK_ERROR(res);
return mp_const_none;
} else if (value == MP_OBJ_SENTINEL) {
// load
DBT key, val;
buf_to_dbt(index, &key);
int res = __bt_get(self->db, &key, &val, 0);
if (res == RET_SPECIAL) {
mp_raise_type(&mp_type_KeyError);
}
CHECK_ERROR(res);
return mp_obj_new_bytes(val.data, val.size);
} else {
// store
DBT key, val;
buf_to_dbt(index, &key);
buf_to_dbt(value, &val);
int res = __bt_put(self->db, &key, &val, 0);
CHECK_ERROR(res);
return mp_const_none;
}
}
all: Remove the &#34;STATIC&#34; macro and just use &#34;static&#34; instead. The STATIC macro was introduced a very long time ago in commit d5df6cd44a433d6253a61cb0f987835fbc06b2de. The original reason for this was to have the option to define it to nothing so that all static functions become global functions and therefore visible to certain debug tools, so one could do function size comparison and other things. This STATIC feature is rarely (if ever) used. And with the use of LTO and heavy inline optimisation, analysing the size of individual functions when they are not static is not a good representation of the size of code when fully optimised. So the macro does not have much use and it&#39;s simpler to just remove it. Then you know exactly what it&#39;s doing. For example, newcomers don&#39;t have to learn what the STATIC macro is and why it exists. Reading the code is also less &#34;loud&#34; with a lowercase static. One other minor point in favour of removing it, is that it stops bugs with `STATIC inline`, which should always be `static inline`. Methodology for this commit was: 1) git ls-files | egrep &#39;\.[ch]$&#39; | \ xargs sed -Ei &#34;s/(^| )STATIC($| )/\1static\2/&#34; 2) Do some manual cleanup in the diff by searching for the word STATIC in comments and changing those back. 3) &#34;git-grep STATIC docs/&#34;, manually fixed those cases. 4) &#34;rg -t python STATIC&#34;, manually fixed codegen lines that used STATIC. This work was funded through GitHub Sponsors. Signed-off-by: Angus Gratton &lt;angus@redyak.com.au&gt;
8 months ago
static mp_obj_t btree_binary_op(mp_binary_op_t op, mp_obj_t lhs_in, mp_obj_t rhs_in) {
mp_obj_btree_t *self = MP_OBJ_TO_PTR(lhs_in);
check_btree_is_open(self);
switch (op) {
case MP_BINARY_OP_CONTAINS: {
DBT key, val;
buf_to_dbt(rhs_in, &key);
int res = __bt_get(self->db, &key, &val, 0);
CHECK_ERROR(res);
return mp_obj_new_bool(res != RET_SPECIAL);
}
default:
// op not supported
return MP_OBJ_NULL;
}
}
#if !MICROPY_ENABLE_DYNRUNTIME
all: Remove the &#34;STATIC&#34; macro and just use &#34;static&#34; instead. The STATIC macro was introduced a very long time ago in commit d5df6cd44a433d6253a61cb0f987835fbc06b2de. The original reason for this was to have the option to define it to nothing so that all static functions become global functions and therefore visible to certain debug tools, so one could do function size comparison and other things. This STATIC feature is rarely (if ever) used. And with the use of LTO and heavy inline optimisation, analysing the size of individual functions when they are not static is not a good representation of the size of code when fully optimised. So the macro does not have much use and it&#39;s simpler to just remove it. Then you know exactly what it&#39;s doing. For example, newcomers don&#39;t have to learn what the STATIC macro is and why it exists. Reading the code is also less &#34;loud&#34; with a lowercase static. One other minor point in favour of removing it, is that it stops bugs with `STATIC inline`, which should always be `static inline`. Methodology for this commit was: 1) git ls-files | egrep &#39;\.[ch]$&#39; | \ xargs sed -Ei &#34;s/(^| )STATIC($| )/\1static\2/&#34; 2) Do some manual cleanup in the diff by searching for the word STATIC in comments and changing those back. 3) &#34;git-grep STATIC docs/&#34;, manually fixed those cases. 4) &#34;rg -t python STATIC&#34;, manually fixed codegen lines that used STATIC. This work was funded through GitHub Sponsors. Signed-off-by: Angus Gratton &lt;angus@redyak.com.au&gt;
8 months ago
static const mp_rom_map_elem_t btree_locals_dict_table[] = {
{ MP_ROM_QSTR(MP_QSTR_close), MP_ROM_PTR(&btree_close_obj) },
{ MP_ROM_QSTR(MP_QSTR_flush), MP_ROM_PTR(&btree_flush_obj) },
{ MP_ROM_QSTR(MP_QSTR_get), MP_ROM_PTR(&btree_get_obj) },
{ MP_ROM_QSTR(MP_QSTR_put), MP_ROM_PTR(&btree_put_obj) },
{ MP_ROM_QSTR(MP_QSTR_seq), MP_ROM_PTR(&btree_seq_obj) },
{ MP_ROM_QSTR(MP_QSTR_keys), MP_ROM_PTR(&btree_keys_obj) },
{ MP_ROM_QSTR(MP_QSTR_values), MP_ROM_PTR(&btree_values_obj) },
{ MP_ROM_QSTR(MP_QSTR_items), MP_ROM_PTR(&btree_items_obj) },
};
all: Remove the &#34;STATIC&#34; macro and just use &#34;static&#34; instead. The STATIC macro was introduced a very long time ago in commit d5df6cd44a433d6253a61cb0f987835fbc06b2de. The original reason for this was to have the option to define it to nothing so that all static functions become global functions and therefore visible to certain debug tools, so one could do function size comparison and other things. This STATIC feature is rarely (if ever) used. And with the use of LTO and heavy inline optimisation, analysing the size of individual functions when they are not static is not a good representation of the size of code when fully optimised. So the macro does not have much use and it&#39;s simpler to just remove it. Then you know exactly what it&#39;s doing. For example, newcomers don&#39;t have to learn what the STATIC macro is and why it exists. Reading the code is also less &#34;loud&#34; with a lowercase static. One other minor point in favour of removing it, is that it stops bugs with `STATIC inline`, which should always be `static inline`. Methodology for this commit was: 1) git ls-files | egrep &#39;\.[ch]$&#39; | \ xargs sed -Ei &#34;s/(^| )STATIC($| )/\1static\2/&#34; 2) Do some manual cleanup in the diff by searching for the word STATIC in comments and changing those back. 3) &#34;git-grep STATIC docs/&#34;, manually fixed those cases. 4) &#34;rg -t python STATIC&#34;, manually fixed codegen lines that used STATIC. This work was funded through GitHub Sponsors. Signed-off-by: Angus Gratton &lt;angus@redyak.com.au&gt;
8 months ago
static MP_DEFINE_CONST_DICT(btree_locals_dict, btree_locals_dict_table);
all: Remove the &#34;STATIC&#34; macro and just use &#34;static&#34; instead. The STATIC macro was introduced a very long time ago in commit d5df6cd44a433d6253a61cb0f987835fbc06b2de. The original reason for this was to have the option to define it to nothing so that all static functions become global functions and therefore visible to certain debug tools, so one could do function size comparison and other things. This STATIC feature is rarely (if ever) used. And with the use of LTO and heavy inline optimisation, analysing the size of individual functions when they are not static is not a good representation of the size of code when fully optimised. So the macro does not have much use and it&#39;s simpler to just remove it. Then you know exactly what it&#39;s doing. For example, newcomers don&#39;t have to learn what the STATIC macro is and why it exists. Reading the code is also less &#34;loud&#34; with a lowercase static. One other minor point in favour of removing it, is that it stops bugs with `STATIC inline`, which should always be `static inline`. Methodology for this commit was: 1) git ls-files | egrep &#39;\.[ch]$&#39; | \ xargs sed -Ei &#34;s/(^| )STATIC($| )/\1static\2/&#34; 2) Do some manual cleanup in the diff by searching for the word STATIC in comments and changing those back. 3) &#34;git-grep STATIC docs/&#34;, manually fixed those cases. 4) &#34;rg -t python STATIC&#34;, manually fixed codegen lines that used STATIC. This work was funded through GitHub Sponsors. Signed-off-by: Angus Gratton &lt;angus@redyak.com.au&gt;
8 months ago
static const mp_getiter_iternext_custom_t btree_getiter_iternext = {
.getiter = btree_getiter,
.iternext = btree_iternext,
};
all: Remove the &#34;STATIC&#34; macro and just use &#34;static&#34; instead. The STATIC macro was introduced a very long time ago in commit d5df6cd44a433d6253a61cb0f987835fbc06b2de. The original reason for this was to have the option to define it to nothing so that all static functions become global functions and therefore visible to certain debug tools, so one could do function size comparison and other things. This STATIC feature is rarely (if ever) used. And with the use of LTO and heavy inline optimisation, analysing the size of individual functions when they are not static is not a good representation of the size of code when fully optimised. So the macro does not have much use and it&#39;s simpler to just remove it. Then you know exactly what it&#39;s doing. For example, newcomers don&#39;t have to learn what the STATIC macro is and why it exists. Reading the code is also less &#34;loud&#34; with a lowercase static. One other minor point in favour of removing it, is that it stops bugs with `STATIC inline`, which should always be `static inline`. Methodology for this commit was: 1) git ls-files | egrep &#39;\.[ch]$&#39; | \ xargs sed -Ei &#34;s/(^| )STATIC($| )/\1static\2/&#34; 2) Do some manual cleanup in the diff by searching for the word STATIC in comments and changing those back. 3) &#34;git-grep STATIC docs/&#34;, manually fixed those cases. 4) &#34;rg -t python STATIC&#34;, manually fixed codegen lines that used STATIC. This work was funded through GitHub Sponsors. Signed-off-by: Angus Gratton &lt;angus@redyak.com.au&gt;
8 months ago
static MP_DEFINE_CONST_OBJ_TYPE(
btree_type,
MP_QSTR_btree,
MP_TYPE_FLAG_ITER_IS_CUSTOM,
// Save on qstr's, reuse same as for module
print, btree_print,
iter, &btree_getiter_iternext,
binary_op, btree_binary_op,
subscr, btree_subscr,
locals_dict, &btree_locals_dict
);
#endif
all: Remove the &#34;STATIC&#34; macro and just use &#34;static&#34; instead. The STATIC macro was introduced a very long time ago in commit d5df6cd44a433d6253a61cb0f987835fbc06b2de. The original reason for this was to have the option to define it to nothing so that all static functions become global functions and therefore visible to certain debug tools, so one could do function size comparison and other things. This STATIC feature is rarely (if ever) used. And with the use of LTO and heavy inline optimisation, analysing the size of individual functions when they are not static is not a good representation of the size of code when fully optimised. So the macro does not have much use and it&#39;s simpler to just remove it. Then you know exactly what it&#39;s doing. For example, newcomers don&#39;t have to learn what the STATIC macro is and why it exists. Reading the code is also less &#34;loud&#34; with a lowercase static. One other minor point in favour of removing it, is that it stops bugs with `STATIC inline`, which should always be `static inline`. Methodology for this commit was: 1) git ls-files | egrep &#39;\.[ch]$&#39; | \ xargs sed -Ei &#34;s/(^| )STATIC($| )/\1static\2/&#34; 2) Do some manual cleanup in the diff by searching for the word STATIC in comments and changing those back. 3) &#34;git-grep STATIC docs/&#34;, manually fixed those cases. 4) &#34;rg -t python STATIC&#34;, manually fixed codegen lines that used STATIC. This work was funded through GitHub Sponsors. Signed-off-by: Angus Gratton &lt;angus@redyak.com.au&gt;
8 months ago
static const FILEVTABLE btree_stream_fvtable = {
mp_stream_posix_read,
mp_stream_posix_write,
mp_stream_posix_lseek,
mp_stream_posix_fsync
};
#if !MICROPY_ENABLE_DYNRUNTIME
all: Remove the &#34;STATIC&#34; macro and just use &#34;static&#34; instead. The STATIC macro was introduced a very long time ago in commit d5df6cd44a433d6253a61cb0f987835fbc06b2de. The original reason for this was to have the option to define it to nothing so that all static functions become global functions and therefore visible to certain debug tools, so one could do function size comparison and other things. This STATIC feature is rarely (if ever) used. And with the use of LTO and heavy inline optimisation, analysing the size of individual functions when they are not static is not a good representation of the size of code when fully optimised. So the macro does not have much use and it&#39;s simpler to just remove it. Then you know exactly what it&#39;s doing. For example, newcomers don&#39;t have to learn what the STATIC macro is and why it exists. Reading the code is also less &#34;loud&#34; with a lowercase static. One other minor point in favour of removing it, is that it stops bugs with `STATIC inline`, which should always be `static inline`. Methodology for this commit was: 1) git ls-files | egrep &#39;\.[ch]$&#39; | \ xargs sed -Ei &#34;s/(^| )STATIC($| )/\1static\2/&#34; 2) Do some manual cleanup in the diff by searching for the word STATIC in comments and changing those back. 3) &#34;git-grep STATIC docs/&#34;, manually fixed those cases. 4) &#34;rg -t python STATIC&#34;, manually fixed codegen lines that used STATIC. This work was funded through GitHub Sponsors. Signed-off-by: Angus Gratton &lt;angus@redyak.com.au&gt;
8 months ago
static mp_obj_t mod_btree_open(size_t n_args, const mp_obj_t *pos_args, mp_map_t *kw_args) {
static const mp_arg_t allowed_args[] = {
{ MP_QSTR_flags, MP_ARG_KW_ONLY | MP_ARG_INT, {.u_int = 0} },
{ MP_QSTR_cachesize, MP_ARG_KW_ONLY | MP_ARG_INT, {.u_int = 0} },
{ MP_QSTR_pagesize, MP_ARG_KW_ONLY | MP_ARG_INT, {.u_int = 0} },
{ MP_QSTR_minkeypage, MP_ARG_KW_ONLY | MP_ARG_INT, {.u_int = 0} },
};
// Make sure we got a stream object
mp_get_stream_raise(pos_args[0], MP_STREAM_OP_READ | MP_STREAM_OP_WRITE | MP_STREAM_OP_IOCTL);
struct {
mp_arg_val_t flags;
mp_arg_val_t cachesize;
mp_arg_val_t pagesize;
mp_arg_val_t minkeypage;
} args;
mp_arg_parse_all(n_args - 1, pos_args + 1, kw_args,
MP_ARRAY_SIZE(allowed_args), allowed_args, (mp_arg_val_t *)&args);
BTREEINFO openinfo = {0};
openinfo.flags = args.flags.u_int;
openinfo.cachesize = args.cachesize.u_int;
openinfo.psize = args.pagesize.u_int;
openinfo.minkeypage = args.minkeypage.u_int;
DB *db = __bt_open(MP_OBJ_TO_PTR(pos_args[0]), &btree_stream_fvtable, &openinfo, /*dflags*/ 0);
if (db == NULL) {
mp_raise_OSError(errno);
}
return MP_OBJ_FROM_PTR(btree_new(db, pos_args[0]));
}
all: Remove the &#34;STATIC&#34; macro and just use &#34;static&#34; instead. The STATIC macro was introduced a very long time ago in commit d5df6cd44a433d6253a61cb0f987835fbc06b2de. The original reason for this was to have the option to define it to nothing so that all static functions become global functions and therefore visible to certain debug tools, so one could do function size comparison and other things. This STATIC feature is rarely (if ever) used. And with the use of LTO and heavy inline optimisation, analysing the size of individual functions when they are not static is not a good representation of the size of code when fully optimised. So the macro does not have much use and it&#39;s simpler to just remove it. Then you know exactly what it&#39;s doing. For example, newcomers don&#39;t have to learn what the STATIC macro is and why it exists. Reading the code is also less &#34;loud&#34; with a lowercase static. One other minor point in favour of removing it, is that it stops bugs with `STATIC inline`, which should always be `static inline`. Methodology for this commit was: 1) git ls-files | egrep &#39;\.[ch]$&#39; | \ xargs sed -Ei &#34;s/(^| )STATIC($| )/\1static\2/&#34; 2) Do some manual cleanup in the diff by searching for the word STATIC in comments and changing those back. 3) &#34;git-grep STATIC docs/&#34;, manually fixed those cases. 4) &#34;rg -t python STATIC&#34;, manually fixed codegen lines that used STATIC. This work was funded through GitHub Sponsors. Signed-off-by: Angus Gratton &lt;angus@redyak.com.au&gt;
8 months ago
static MP_DEFINE_CONST_FUN_OBJ_KW(mod_btree_open_obj, 1, mod_btree_open);
all: Remove the &#34;STATIC&#34; macro and just use &#34;static&#34; instead. The STATIC macro was introduced a very long time ago in commit d5df6cd44a433d6253a61cb0f987835fbc06b2de. The original reason for this was to have the option to define it to nothing so that all static functions become global functions and therefore visible to certain debug tools, so one could do function size comparison and other things. This STATIC feature is rarely (if ever) used. And with the use of LTO and heavy inline optimisation, analysing the size of individual functions when they are not static is not a good representation of the size of code when fully optimised. So the macro does not have much use and it&#39;s simpler to just remove it. Then you know exactly what it&#39;s doing. For example, newcomers don&#39;t have to learn what the STATIC macro is and why it exists. Reading the code is also less &#34;loud&#34; with a lowercase static. One other minor point in favour of removing it, is that it stops bugs with `STATIC inline`, which should always be `static inline`. Methodology for this commit was: 1) git ls-files | egrep &#39;\.[ch]$&#39; | \ xargs sed -Ei &#34;s/(^| )STATIC($| )/\1static\2/&#34; 2) Do some manual cleanup in the diff by searching for the word STATIC in comments and changing those back. 3) &#34;git-grep STATIC docs/&#34;, manually fixed those cases. 4) &#34;rg -t python STATIC&#34;, manually fixed codegen lines that used STATIC. This work was funded through GitHub Sponsors. Signed-off-by: Angus Gratton &lt;angus@redyak.com.au&gt;
8 months ago
static const mp_rom_map_elem_t mp_module_btree_globals_table[] = {
{ MP_ROM_QSTR(MP_QSTR___name__), MP_ROM_QSTR(MP_QSTR_btree) },
{ MP_ROM_QSTR(MP_QSTR_open), MP_ROM_PTR(&mod_btree_open_obj) },
{ MP_ROM_QSTR(MP_QSTR_INCL), MP_ROM_INT(FLAG_END_KEY_INCL) },
{ MP_ROM_QSTR(MP_QSTR_DESC), MP_ROM_INT(FLAG_DESC) },
};
all: Remove the &#34;STATIC&#34; macro and just use &#34;static&#34; instead. The STATIC macro was introduced a very long time ago in commit d5df6cd44a433d6253a61cb0f987835fbc06b2de. The original reason for this was to have the option to define it to nothing so that all static functions become global functions and therefore visible to certain debug tools, so one could do function size comparison and other things. This STATIC feature is rarely (if ever) used. And with the use of LTO and heavy inline optimisation, analysing the size of individual functions when they are not static is not a good representation of the size of code when fully optimised. So the macro does not have much use and it&#39;s simpler to just remove it. Then you know exactly what it&#39;s doing. For example, newcomers don&#39;t have to learn what the STATIC macro is and why it exists. Reading the code is also less &#34;loud&#34; with a lowercase static. One other minor point in favour of removing it, is that it stops bugs with `STATIC inline`, which should always be `static inline`. Methodology for this commit was: 1) git ls-files | egrep &#39;\.[ch]$&#39; | \ xargs sed -Ei &#34;s/(^| )STATIC($| )/\1static\2/&#34; 2) Do some manual cleanup in the diff by searching for the word STATIC in comments and changing those back. 3) &#34;git-grep STATIC docs/&#34;, manually fixed those cases. 4) &#34;rg -t python STATIC&#34;, manually fixed codegen lines that used STATIC. This work was funded through GitHub Sponsors. Signed-off-by: Angus Gratton &lt;angus@redyak.com.au&gt;
8 months ago
static MP_DEFINE_CONST_DICT(mp_module_btree_globals, mp_module_btree_globals_table);
const mp_obj_module_t mp_module_btree = {
.base = { &mp_type_module },
.globals = (mp_obj_dict_t *)&mp_module_btree_globals,
};
MP_REGISTER_MODULE(MP_QSTR_btree, mp_module_btree);
#endif
#endif // MICROPY_PY_BTREE