You can not select more than 25 topics Topics must start with a letter or number, can include dashes ('-') and can be up to 35 characters long.

85 lines
2.1 KiB

qemu-arm: fully integrated test suite. This is primarily intended to provide testing of Thumb-specific code within Travis CI as well as if anyone else want to run it locally. As discussed in purposes. This is currently agains an emulated Cortex-M3 core, however in the near future it can extended to support M0, M0+ as well M4 (work in progress exists in sushihangover/qemu). It's probably true that most of the code base can be covered running uPy natively on a POSIX system, however we do have the tiny bit of assembly code. There may exist bugs related to endianness and type aliases, let alone potential standard library or compiler bugs or even architecture-specific optimisations. This could also incorporate lwIP (or other TCP/IP stack) integration as well as SDIO+FATFS drivers. The solution to inline the test cases was chose due to simplicity. It could alternatively be implemented in a number of different way (see #515), but this looked the simplest. Inclusion of tinytest was just to avoid writing boilerplate code for counting failed tests and other utility functions. Currently only a few functions are used, however this could be extended. Checking in the code instead of using submodule was a personal preference, but if people do want the pain of submodules, this can provided. This particular framework is also pretty good if one desires to run unit test on target. The approach with scripts being inlined is probably not quite suited for the size of memory an MCU has, but the tinytest itself should be good, if lower-level C code is to be unit tested.
11 years ago
#include <stdint.h>
#include <stdio.h>
#include <string.h>
#include <malloc.h>
qemu-arm: fully integrated test suite. This is primarily intended to provide testing of Thumb-specific code within Travis CI as well as if anyone else want to run it locally. As discussed in purposes. This is currently agains an emulated Cortex-M3 core, however in the near future it can extended to support M0, M0+ as well M4 (work in progress exists in sushihangover/qemu). It&#39;s probably true that most of the code base can be covered running uPy natively on a POSIX system, however we do have the tiny bit of assembly code. There may exist bugs related to endianness and type aliases, let alone potential standard library or compiler bugs or even architecture-specific optimisations. This could also incorporate lwIP (or other TCP/IP stack) integration as well as SDIO+FATFS drivers. The solution to inline the test cases was chose due to simplicity. It could alternatively be implemented in a number of different way (see #515), but this looked the simplest. Inclusion of tinytest was just to avoid writing boilerplate code for counting failed tests and other utility functions. Currently only a few functions are used, however this could be extended. Checking in the code instead of using submodule was a personal preference, but if people do want the pain of submodules, this can provided. This particular framework is also pretty good if one desires to run unit test on target. The approach with scripts being inlined is probably not quite suited for the size of memory an MCU has, but the tinytest itself should be good, if lower-level C code is to be unit tested.
11 years ago
#include "py/nlr.h"
#include "py/obj.h"
#include "py/compile.h"
#include "py/runtime0.h"
#include "py/runtime.h"
#include "py/stackctrl.h"
#include "py/gc.h"
#include "py/repl.h"
#include "py/pfenv.h"
qemu-arm: fully integrated test suite. This is primarily intended to provide testing of Thumb-specific code within Travis CI as well as if anyone else want to run it locally. As discussed in purposes. This is currently agains an emulated Cortex-M3 core, however in the near future it can extended to support M0, M0+ as well M4 (work in progress exists in sushihangover/qemu). It&#39;s probably true that most of the code base can be covered running uPy natively on a POSIX system, however we do have the tiny bit of assembly code. There may exist bugs related to endianness and type aliases, let alone potential standard library or compiler bugs or even architecture-specific optimisations. This could also incorporate lwIP (or other TCP/IP stack) integration as well as SDIO+FATFS drivers. The solution to inline the test cases was chose due to simplicity. It could alternatively be implemented in a number of different way (see #515), but this looked the simplest. Inclusion of tinytest was just to avoid writing boilerplate code for counting failed tests and other utility functions. Currently only a few functions are used, however this could be extended. Checking in the code instead of using submodule was a personal preference, but if people do want the pain of submodules, this can provided. This particular framework is also pretty good if one desires to run unit test on target. The approach with scripts being inlined is probably not quite suited for the size of memory an MCU has, but the tinytest itself should be good, if lower-level C code is to be unit tested.
11 years ago
#include "tinytest.h"
#include "tinytest_macros.h"
void do_str(const char *src);
qemu-arm: fully integrated test suite. This is primarily intended to provide testing of Thumb-specific code within Travis CI as well as if anyone else want to run it locally. As discussed in purposes. This is currently agains an emulated Cortex-M3 core, however in the near future it can extended to support M0, M0+ as well M4 (work in progress exists in sushihangover/qemu). It&#39;s probably true that most of the code base can be covered running uPy natively on a POSIX system, however we do have the tiny bit of assembly code. There may exist bugs related to endianness and type aliases, let alone potential standard library or compiler bugs or even architecture-specific optimisations. This could also incorporate lwIP (or other TCP/IP stack) integration as well as SDIO+FATFS drivers. The solution to inline the test cases was chose due to simplicity. It could alternatively be implemented in a number of different way (see #515), but this looked the simplest. Inclusion of tinytest was just to avoid writing boilerplate code for counting failed tests and other utility functions. Currently only a few functions are used, however this could be extended. Checking in the code instead of using submodule was a personal preference, but if people do want the pain of submodules, this can provided. This particular framework is also pretty good if one desires to run unit test on target. The approach with scripts being inlined is probably not quite suited for the size of memory an MCU has, but the tinytest itself should be good, if lower-level C code is to be unit tested.
11 years ago
inline void do_str(const char *src) {
mp_lexer_t *lex = mp_lexer_new_from_str_len(MP_QSTR__lt_stdin_gt_, src, strlen(src), 0);
if (lex == NULL) {
tt_abort_msg("Lexer initialization error");
}
nlr_buf_t nlr;
if (nlr_push(&nlr) == 0) {
qstr source_name = lex->source_name;
mp_parse_node_t pn = mp_parse(lex, MP_PARSE_FILE_INPUT);
mp_obj_t module_fun = mp_compile(pn, source_name, MP_EMIT_OPT_NONE, true);
qemu-arm: fully integrated test suite. This is primarily intended to provide testing of Thumb-specific code within Travis CI as well as if anyone else want to run it locally. As discussed in purposes. This is currently agains an emulated Cortex-M3 core, however in the near future it can extended to support M0, M0+ as well M4 (work in progress exists in sushihangover/qemu). It&#39;s probably true that most of the code base can be covered running uPy natively on a POSIX system, however we do have the tiny bit of assembly code. There may exist bugs related to endianness and type aliases, let alone potential standard library or compiler bugs or even architecture-specific optimisations. This could also incorporate lwIP (or other TCP/IP stack) integration as well as SDIO+FATFS drivers. The solution to inline the test cases was chose due to simplicity. It could alternatively be implemented in a number of different way (see #515), but this looked the simplest. Inclusion of tinytest was just to avoid writing boilerplate code for counting failed tests and other utility functions. Currently only a few functions are used, however this could be extended. Checking in the code instead of using submodule was a personal preference, but if people do want the pain of submodules, this can provided. This particular framework is also pretty good if one desires to run unit test on target. The approach with scripts being inlined is probably not quite suited for the size of memory an MCU has, but the tinytest itself should be good, if lower-level C code is to be unit tested.
11 years ago
mp_call_function_0(module_fun);
nlr_pop();
} else {
mp_obj_print_exception(printf_wrapper, NULL, (mp_obj_t)nlr.ret_val);
qemu-arm: fully integrated test suite. This is primarily intended to provide testing of Thumb-specific code within Travis CI as well as if anyone else want to run it locally. As discussed in purposes. This is currently agains an emulated Cortex-M3 core, however in the near future it can extended to support M0, M0+ as well M4 (work in progress exists in sushihangover/qemu). It&#39;s probably true that most of the code base can be covered running uPy natively on a POSIX system, however we do have the tiny bit of assembly code. There may exist bugs related to endianness and type aliases, let alone potential standard library or compiler bugs or even architecture-specific optimisations. This could also incorporate lwIP (or other TCP/IP stack) integration as well as SDIO+FATFS drivers. The solution to inline the test cases was chose due to simplicity. It could alternatively be implemented in a number of different way (see #515), but this looked the simplest. Inclusion of tinytest was just to avoid writing boilerplate code for counting failed tests and other utility functions. Currently only a few functions are used, however this could be extended. Checking in the code instead of using submodule was a personal preference, but if people do want the pain of submodules, this can provided. This particular framework is also pretty good if one desires to run unit test on target. The approach with scripts being inlined is probably not quite suited for the size of memory an MCU has, but the tinytest itself should be good, if lower-level C code is to be unit tested.
11 years ago
tt_abort_msg("Uncaught exception");
}
end:
;
}
#include "genhdr/tests.h"
int main() {
const char a[] = {"sim"};
mp_stack_set_limit(10240);
void *heap = malloc(256 * 1024);
gc_init(heap, (char*)heap + 256 * 1024);
qemu-arm: fully integrated test suite. This is primarily intended to provide testing of Thumb-specific code within Travis CI as well as if anyone else want to run it locally. As discussed in purposes. This is currently agains an emulated Cortex-M3 core, however in the near future it can extended to support M0, M0+ as well M4 (work in progress exists in sushihangover/qemu). It&#39;s probably true that most of the code base can be covered running uPy natively on a POSIX system, however we do have the tiny bit of assembly code. There may exist bugs related to endianness and type aliases, let alone potential standard library or compiler bugs or even architecture-specific optimisations. This could also incorporate lwIP (or other TCP/IP stack) integration as well as SDIO+FATFS drivers. The solution to inline the test cases was chose due to simplicity. It could alternatively be implemented in a number of different way (see #515), but this looked the simplest. Inclusion of tinytest was just to avoid writing boilerplate code for counting failed tests and other utility functions. Currently only a few functions are used, however this could be extended. Checking in the code instead of using submodule was a personal preference, but if people do want the pain of submodules, this can provided. This particular framework is also pretty good if one desires to run unit test on target. The approach with scripts being inlined is probably not quite suited for the size of memory an MCU has, but the tinytest itself should be good, if lower-level C code is to be unit tested.
11 years ago
mp_init();
int r = tinytest_main(1, (const char **) a, groups);
mp_deinit();
printf( "status: %i\n", r);
return r;
}
void gc_collect(void) {
gc_collect_start();
// get the registers and the sp
jmp_buf env;
setjmp(env);
volatile mp_uint_t dummy;
void *sp = (void*)&dummy;
// trace the stack, including the registers (since they live on the stack in this function)
gc_collect_root((void**)sp, ((uint32_t)MP_STATE_VM(stack_top) - (uint32_t)sp) / sizeof(uint32_t));
gc_collect_end();
qemu-arm: fully integrated test suite. This is primarily intended to provide testing of Thumb-specific code within Travis CI as well as if anyone else want to run it locally. As discussed in purposes. This is currently agains an emulated Cortex-M3 core, however in the near future it can extended to support M0, M0+ as well M4 (work in progress exists in sushihangover/qemu). It&#39;s probably true that most of the code base can be covered running uPy natively on a POSIX system, however we do have the tiny bit of assembly code. There may exist bugs related to endianness and type aliases, let alone potential standard library or compiler bugs or even architecture-specific optimisations. This could also incorporate lwIP (or other TCP/IP stack) integration as well as SDIO+FATFS drivers. The solution to inline the test cases was chose due to simplicity. It could alternatively be implemented in a number of different way (see #515), but this looked the simplest. Inclusion of tinytest was just to avoid writing boilerplate code for counting failed tests and other utility functions. Currently only a few functions are used, however this could be extended. Checking in the code instead of using submodule was a personal preference, but if people do want the pain of submodules, this can provided. This particular framework is also pretty good if one desires to run unit test on target. The approach with scripts being inlined is probably not quite suited for the size of memory an MCU has, but the tinytest itself should be good, if lower-level C code is to be unit tested.
11 years ago
}
mp_lexer_t *mp_lexer_new_from_file(const char *filename) {
return NULL;
}
mp_import_stat_t mp_import_stat(const char *path) {
return MP_IMPORT_STAT_NO_EXIST;
}
mp_obj_t mp_builtin_open(uint n_args, const mp_obj_t *args, mp_map_t *kwargs) {
qemu-arm: fully integrated test suite. This is primarily intended to provide testing of Thumb-specific code within Travis CI as well as if anyone else want to run it locally. As discussed in purposes. This is currently agains an emulated Cortex-M3 core, however in the near future it can extended to support M0, M0+ as well M4 (work in progress exists in sushihangover/qemu). It&#39;s probably true that most of the code base can be covered running uPy natively on a POSIX system, however we do have the tiny bit of assembly code. There may exist bugs related to endianness and type aliases, let alone potential standard library or compiler bugs or even architecture-specific optimisations. This could also incorporate lwIP (or other TCP/IP stack) integration as well as SDIO+FATFS drivers. The solution to inline the test cases was chose due to simplicity. It could alternatively be implemented in a number of different way (see #515), but this looked the simplest. Inclusion of tinytest was just to avoid writing boilerplate code for counting failed tests and other utility functions. Currently only a few functions are used, however this could be extended. Checking in the code instead of using submodule was a personal preference, but if people do want the pain of submodules, this can provided. This particular framework is also pretty good if one desires to run unit test on target. The approach with scripts being inlined is probably not quite suited for the size of memory an MCU has, but the tinytest itself should be good, if lower-level C code is to be unit tested.
11 years ago
return mp_const_none;
}
MP_DEFINE_CONST_FUN_OBJ_KW(mp_builtin_open_obj, 1, mp_builtin_open);
qemu-arm: fully integrated test suite. This is primarily intended to provide testing of Thumb-specific code within Travis CI as well as if anyone else want to run it locally. As discussed in purposes. This is currently agains an emulated Cortex-M3 core, however in the near future it can extended to support M0, M0+ as well M4 (work in progress exists in sushihangover/qemu). It&#39;s probably true that most of the code base can be covered running uPy natively on a POSIX system, however we do have the tiny bit of assembly code. There may exist bugs related to endianness and type aliases, let alone potential standard library or compiler bugs or even architecture-specific optimisations. This could also incorporate lwIP (or other TCP/IP stack) integration as well as SDIO+FATFS drivers. The solution to inline the test cases was chose due to simplicity. It could alternatively be implemented in a number of different way (see #515), but this looked the simplest. Inclusion of tinytest was just to avoid writing boilerplate code for counting failed tests and other utility functions. Currently only a few functions are used, however this could be extended. Checking in the code instead of using submodule was a personal preference, but if people do want the pain of submodules, this can provided. This particular framework is also pretty good if one desires to run unit test on target. The approach with scripts being inlined is probably not quite suited for the size of memory an MCU has, but the tinytest itself should be good, if lower-level C code is to be unit tested.
11 years ago
void nlr_jump_fail(void *val) {
}