You can not select more than 25 topics Topics must start with a letter or number, can include dashes ('-') and can be up to 35 characters long.
 
 
 
 
 
Ayke van Laethem 385d1d0a5d
compiler,runtime: implement a portable conservative GC
6 years ago
..
README.md docs: change links in README and remove old ReadTheDocs pages to point to TinyGo.org site 6 years ago
errors.go all: rename go-llvm to new import path 6 years ago
frame.go compiler,runtime: implement a portable conservative GC 5 years ago
interp.go compiler: add debug info for function arguments 6 years ago
scan.go compiler,runtime: implement a portable conservative GC 5 years ago
utils.go interp: support some more expressions in const icmp 6 years ago
values.go interp: refactor to eliminate lots of code 6 years ago

README.md

Partial evaluation of initialization code in Go

For several reasons related to code size and memory consumption (see below), it is best to try to evaluate as much initialization code at compile time as possible and only run unknown expressions (e.g. external calls) at runtime. This is in practice a partial evaluator of the runtime.initAll function, which calls each package initializer.

It works by directly interpreting LLVM IR:

  • Almost all operations work directly on constants, and are implemented using the llvm.Const* set of functions that are evaluated directly.
  • External function calls and some other operations (inline assembly, volatile load, volatile store) are seen as having limited side effects. Limited in the sense that it is known at compile time which globals it affects, which then are marked 'dirty' (meaning, further operations on it must be done at runtime). These operations are emitted directly in the runtime.initAll function. Return values are also considered 'dirty'.
  • Such 'dirty' objects and local values must be executed at runtime instead of at compile time. This dirtyness propagates further through the IR, for example storing a dirty local value to a global also makes the global dirty, meaning that the global may not be read or written at compile time as it's contents at that point during interpretation is unknown.
  • There are some heuristics in place to avoid doing too much with dirty values. For example, a branch based on a dirty local marks the whole function itself as having side effect (as if it is an external function). However, all globals it touches are still taken into account and when a call is inserted in runtime.initAll, all globals it references are also marked dirty.
  • Heap allocation (runtime.alloc) is emulated by creating new objects. The value in the allocation is the initializer of the global, the zero value is the zero initializer.
  • Stack allocation (alloca) is often emulated using a fake alloca object, until the address of the alloca is taken in which case it is also created as a real alloca in runtime.initAll and marked dirty. This may be necessary when calling an external function with the given alloca as paramter.

Why is this necessary?

A partial evaluator is hard to get right, so why go through all the trouble of writing one?

The main reason is that the previous attempt wasn't complete and wasn't sound. It simply tried to evaluate Go SSA directly, which was good but more difficult than necessary. An IR based interpreter needs to understand fewer instructions as the LLVM IR simply has less (complex) instructions than Go SSA. Also, LLVM provides some useful tools like easily getting all uses of a function or global, which Go SSA does not provide.

But why is it necessary at all? The answer is that globals with initializers are much easier to optimize by LLVM than initialization code. Also, there are a few other benefits:

  • Dead globals are trivial to optimize away.
  • Constant globals are easier to detect. Remember that Go does not have global constants in the same sense as that C has them. Constants are useful because they can be propagated and provide some opportunities for other optimizations (like dead code elimination when branching on the contents of a global).
  • Constants are much more efficent on microcontrollers, as they can be allocated in flash instead of RAM.

For more details, see this section of the documentation.