The flag CIST_FIN does not mark a finalizer, but the function that was
running when the finalizer was called. (So, the function did not call
the finalizer, but it looks that way in the stack.)
Instead of assuming that shrinking a block may be an emergency
collection, use an explicit field ('gcstopem') to stop emergency
collections while GC is working.
When, inside a coroutine, a C function with to-be-closed slots return,
the corresponding metamethods can yield. ('__close' metamethods called
through 'lua_closeslot' still cannot yield, as there is no continuation
to go when resuming.)
To-be-closed variables are linked in their own list, embedded into the
stack elements. (Due to alignment, this information does not change
the size of the stack elements in most architectures.) This new list
does not produce garbage and avoids memory errors when creating tbc
variables.
Completes commit b07fc10e91. '__close' metamethods can yield even
when they are being called due to an error. '__close' metamethods from
C functions are still not allowed to yield.
The stack size is derived from 'stack_last', when needed. Moreover,
the handling of stack sizes is more consistent, always excluding the
extra space except when allocating/deallocating the array.
The previous stackless implementations marked all 'luaV_execute'
invocations as fresh. However, re-entering 'luaV_execute' when
resuming a coroutine should not be a fresh invocation. (It works
because 'unroll' called 'luaV_execute' for each call entry, but
it was slower than letting 'luaV_execute' finish all non-fresh
invocations.)
A "with stack" implementation gains too little in performance to be
worth all the noise from C-stack overflows.
This commit is almost a sketch, to test performance. There are several
pending stuff:
- review control of C-stack overflow and error messages;
- what to do with setcstacklimit;
- review comments;
- review unroll of Lua calls.
OLD1 objects can be potentially anywhere in the 'allgc' list (up
to 'reallyold'), but frequently they are all after 'old1' (natural
evolution of survivals) or do not exist at all (when all objects die
young). So, instead of 'markold' starts looking for them always
from the start of 'allgc', the collector keeps an extra pointer,
'firstold1', that points to the first OLD1 object in the 'allgc' list,
or is NULL if there are no OLD1 objects in that list.
The field 'L->oldpc' is not always updated when control returns to a
function; an invalid value can seg. fault when computing 'changedline'.
(One example is an error in a finalizer; control can return to
'luaV_execute' without executing 'luaD_poscall'.) Instead of trying to
fix all possible corner cases, it seems safer to be resilient to invalid
values for 'oldpc'. Valid but wrong values at most cause an extra call
to a line hook.
- new error message for "attempt to assign to const variable"
- note in the manual about compatibility options
- comments
- small changes in 'read_line' and 'pushstr'
- The warning functions get an extra parameter that tells whether
message is to be continued (instead of using end-of-lines as a signal).
- The user data for the warning function is a regular value, instead
of a writable slot inside the Lua state.
After a major bad collection (one that collects too few objects),
next collection will be major again. In that case, avoid switching
back to generational mode (as it will have to switch again to
incremental to do next major collection).
* unification of the 'nny' and 'nCcalls' counters;
* external C functions ('lua_CFunction') count more "slots" in
the C stack (to allow for their possible use of buffers)
* added a new test script specific for C-stack overflows. (Most
of those tests were already present, but concentrating them
in a single script easies the task of checking whether
'LUAI_MAXCCALLS' is adequate in a system.)
The mechanism of "caching the last closure created for a prototype to
try to reuse it the next time a closure for that prototype is created"
was removed. There are several reasons:
- It is hard to find a natural example where this cache has a measurable
impact on performance.
- Programmers already perceive closure creation as something slow,
so they tend to avoid it inside hot paths. (Any case where the cache
could reuse a closure can be rewritten predefining the closure in some
variable and using that variable.)
- The implementation was somewhat complex, due to a bad interaction
with the generational collector. (Typically, new closures are new,
while prototypes are old. So, the cache breaks the invariant that
old objects should not point to new ones.)
Start of the implementation of "scoped variables" or "to be closed"
variables, local variables whose '__close' (or themselves) are called
when they go out of scope. This commit implements the syntax, the
opcode, and the creation of the corresponding upvalue, but it still
does not call the finalizations when the variable goes out of scope
(the most important part).
Currently, the syntax is 'local scoped name = exp', but that will
probably change.
As hinted in the manual for Lua 5.3, the emulation of the metamethod
for '__le' using '__le' has been deprecated. It is slow, complicates
the logic, and it is easy to avoid this emulation by defining a proper
'__le' function.
Moreover, often this emulation was used wrongly, with a programmer
assuming that an order is total when it is not (e.g., NaN in
floating-point numbers).
The counter 'nCcalls' now includes the number of CallInfo structures
pre-allocated (so that these "potential" C calls can be made without
checking 'nCcalls'). So, when copying this value from a thread to
another, in 'lua_resume', it must be corrected to the number of
CallInfo structures in the thread being resumed.
Roberto Ierusalimschy